Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-933-1 | CAS number: 12042-91-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Sediment toxicity
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- sediment toxicity: long-term
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- assessment report
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2 099.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 092 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: wet weight
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 2 099.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2 099.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: wet weight
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 2 099.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 860.7 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: wet weight
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL:733.1-1010.5 µg/L
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 1 148.5 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: wet weight
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 1026.7- 1284.7 µg/L
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2 036 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: wet weight
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 1944 - 12131.0 µg/l
- Details on results:
- /
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- /
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical analysis was performed using measured average total Al concentrations of newly prepared solutions. Differences in the number of individuals and the intrinsic growth rate and growth at test termination were evaluated using a statistical computer package (Comprehensive Environmental Toxicity Information System [CETIS], Tidepool Scientific Software, McKinleyville, CA, USA and Toxicity Relationship Analysis Program [TRAP], Duluth, MN, USA). If the data met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity, the NOEC and LOEC were estimated using an analysis of variance to compare (p = 0.05) organism performance in the experimental treatments with that observed in the control. The median-lethal concentration (LC50) was estimated using linear interpolation. The effective concentrations to reduce growth by 10%, 20%, or 50% relative to control performance (EC10/EC20/EC50) were estimated using threshold sigmoid regression analysis. Exposure concentrations were log-transformed before determination of the EC10, EC20, and EC50 values. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Total measured exposure concentrations ranged from 5 to 2099 μg Al/L and resulted in no effect on organism survival; however, a significant effect on snail growth was observed at the highest treatment. The study resulted in a no observable effect concentration [NOEC] of 1092 μg/L total Al and a lowest observable effect concentration [LOEC] of 2099 μg/L total Al for growth. The effective concentrations to reduce growth by 10% and 20% relative to control performance (EC10 and EC20 with 95% confidence intervals) was 860.7 (733.1 – 1010.5) and 1148.5 (1026.7 – 1284.7) μg/L total Al, respectively.
- Executive summary:
As part of an environmental program designed to provide data for the setting of water quality standards, data describing the chronic toxicity of aluminum to a variety of aquatic organisms are needed. Aluminum toxicity is a function of the chemical species of aluminum present in the water and this speciation is a function of the physico/chemical properties (e.g., pH) of the water. To this end, efforts are underway to develop data describing the chronic toxicity of aluminum to aquatic organisms at hydrogen ion concentrations (i.e., pH) typical of natural environmental conditions (i.e., pH of 6.0).
The study reported herein determines the chronic toxicity of aluminum, at a pH of 6.0, to the great pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Use of this test organism qualifies as a level of organization (Phylum) that is not currently represented as part of the minimum taxonomic requirements for calculation of a predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for the freshwater aquatic compartment, within the context of a species sensitivity distribution approach (European Commission 2003). In this study, L. stagnalis were exposed to a series of aluminum concentrations for thirty days, starting as newly hatched organisms (<24 hours old). To allow for possible changes in aluminum speciation, exposure solutions were aged for a 3-hour equilibrium period prior to organism exposure. Nominal test concentrations ranged from 0 to 2000 μg Al/L and total, dissolved, and monomeric aluminum were measured throughout the test. As the formation of insoluble chemical species was apparent through low dissolved and monomeric measurements (all concentrations measuring below 100 μg Al/L), total Al was used to interpret the biological data in this study. Total measured exposure concentrations ranged from 5 to 2099 μg Al/L and resulted in no effect on organism survival; however, a significant effect on snail growth was observed at the highest treatment. The study resulted in a no observable effect concentration [NOEC] of 1092 μg/L total Al and a lowest observable effect concentration [LOEC] of 2099 μg/L total Al for growth. The effective concentrations to reduce growth by 10% and 20% relative to control performance (EC10 and EC20 with 95% confidence intervals) was 860.7 (733.1 – 1010.5) and 1148.5 (1026.7 – 1284.7) μg/L total Al, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- sediment toxicity: long-term
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- assessment report
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 453.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 53.1 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- growth
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 232.6 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- growth
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 123.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- dry weight
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 232.6 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- dry weight
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 232.6 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 453.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 123.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- growth
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 453.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- growth
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 232.6 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- dry weight
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 453.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- dry weight
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 453.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 142.6 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- growth
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 66.8-304.2 µg/L
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 227.7 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- growth
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 59.2 - 875.9 µg/L
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 152.3 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- dry weight
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 128.3-375.1 µg/L
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 219.4 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- dry weight
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 128.3-375.1 µg/L
- Duration:
- 42 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 170.6 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL:126.8-229.6
- Details on results:
- /
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- /
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical analysis was performed using measured average total Al concentrations. Differences in survival (at Days 28, 35, and 42), growth (at Days 28 and 42), and reproduction (at Days 35 and 42) were evaluated using a statistical computer package (Comprehensive Environmental Toxicity Information System [CETIS], Tidepool Scientific Software, McKinleyville, CA, USA and Toxicity Relationship Analysis Program [TRAP], Duluth, MN, USA). If the data met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity, the NOEC and LOEC were estimated using an analysis of variance to compare (p = 0.05) organism performance in the experimental treatments with that observed in the control. The median-lethal concentration (LC50) was estimated using linear interpolation. The effective concentrations to reduce survival, growth, or reproduction by 10%, 20%, or 50% relative to control performance (EC10/EC20/EC50) were estimated using threshold sigmoid regression analysis. Exposure concentrations were log-transformed before determination of the EC10, EC20, and EC50 values.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- No effect on survival was observed at 28, 35, or 42-days. Growth (as mean dry biomass) at Day 28 was determined to be most sensitive endpoint. The study resulted in a no observable effect concentration [NOEC] of 53.1 μg/L total Al and a lowest observable effect concentration [LOEC] of 123.2 μg/L total Al for growth (as Day 28 mean dry biomass). The effective concentrations to reduce growth by 10% and 20% relative to control performance (EC10 and EC20 with 95% confidence intervals) were 142.6 (66.8 – 304.2) and 199.3 (116.7 – 340.2) μg/L total Al, respectively.
- Executive summary:
As part of an environmental program designed to provide data for the setting of water quality standards, data describing the chronic toxicity of aluminum to a variety of aquatic organisms is needed. Aluminum toxicity is a function of the chemical species of aluminum present in the water and this speciation is a function of the physico/chemical properties (e.g., pH) of the water. Efforts are underway to develop data describing the chronic toxicity of aluminum to aquatic organisms at hydrogen ion concentrations (i.e., pH) typical of natural environmental conditions (i.e., pH of 6). The study reported herein describes the chronic toxicity of aluminum, at a pH of 6.0, to the amphipod, Hyalella azteca. Use of this test organism qualifies as a level of organization (Phylum) to be used as part of the minimum taxonomic requirements for calculation of a predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for the freshwater aquatic compartment, within the context of a species sensitivity distribution approach (European Commission 2003). H. azteca were exposed to a series of aluminum concentrations for forty-two days, starting as 7-9 day old juveniles. To allow for potential changes in aluminum speciation, exposure solutions were aged for a 3-hour equilibrium period. As the formation of insoluble chemical species was apparent through low dissolved and monomeric measurements, total Al was used to interpret the biological data in this study. Measured pH values in the test averaged 5.7 – 6.3 in waters immediately prior to organism exposure and averaged 6.2 – 6.6 within the test chambers. Nominal test concentrations ranged from 0 to 450 μg Al/L and total, dissolved, and monomeric aluminum were measured throughout the test. The test had measured exposure concentrations ranging from 2.2 to 453.8 μg total Al/L and the endpoints analyzed were: 28-day survival and growth, 35- survival and reproduction, and 42-day survival, growth, and reproduction. Out of the full chronic life-cycle (42 day) endpoints of survival, growth, and reproduction, reproduction was the most sensitive endpoint for the entire life-cycle study, resulting in a no observable effect concentration [NOEC] of 232.6 μg/L total Al and a lowest observable effect concentration [LOEC] of 453.8 μg/L total Al. The effective concentrations to reduce reproduction by 10% and 20% relative to control performance (EC10 and EC20 with 95% confidence intervals) were 170.6 (126.8 –229.6) and 197.7 (154.9 – 252.3) μg/L total Al, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- sediment toxicity: long-term
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- assessment report
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration:
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4 281.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4 281.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 100.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- Ash free dry weight
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4 281.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 4 281.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 4 281.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2 132.7 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- Ash free dry weight
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 4 281.8 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 2 923 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 857-0.9997.0 µg/L
- Duration:
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 971.6 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- Ash free dry weight
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL:220.8-4276.0 µg/L
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 1 271.5 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 134.7 - 14715.5 µg/l
- Duration:
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 4 691 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL:547-10191.0 µg/L
- Duration:
- 10 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 1 933.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks:
- Ash free dry weight
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 3 387 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 1010.0 - 13438.0 µg/L
- Details on results:
- /
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- /
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical analysis was performed using measured average total Al concentrations. Differences in survival (at Day 10), growth (at Day 10), adult emergence, and reproduction (as number of eggs per egg case) were evaluated using a statistical computer package (Comprehensive Environmental Toxicity Information System [CETIS], Tidepool Scientific Software, McKinleyville, CA, USA and Toxicity Relationship Analysis Program [TRAP], Duluth, MN, USA). If the data met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity, the NOEC and LOEC were estimated using an analysis of variance to compare (p = 0.05) organism performance in the experimental treatments with that observed in the control. The effective concentrations to reduce survival, growth, or reproduction by 10% or 20% relative to control performance (EC10/EC20) were estimated using threshold sigmoid regression analysis. Exposure concentrations were log-transformed before determination of the EC10 and EC20 values. Initial parameters input into the TRAP database for logIC50, Y-intercept, and steepness were: 4.2, 335.0, and 0.50, respectively. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The endpoints analyzed were: 10- day survival and growth, adult emergence, and reproduction. No effect on survival was observed at Day 10 or Day 28. Growth at Day 10 (as ash-free dry weight) was determined to be the most sensitive growth endpoint. The study resulted in a no observable effect concentration [NOEC] of 1100.2 μg/L total Al and a lowest observable effect concentration [LOEC] of 2132.7 μg/L total Al for growth (for Day 10 growth). The effective concentrations to reduce growth by 10% and 20% relative to control performance (EC10 and EC20 with 95% confidence intervals) were 971.6 (220.8 – 4276.0) and 1933.2 (798.3 – 4681.4) μg/L total Al, respectively.
- Executive summary:
As part of an environmental program designed to provide data for the setting of water quality standards, data describing the chronic toxicity of aluminum to a variety of aquatic organisms is needed. Aluminum toxicity is a function of the chemical species of aluminum present in the water and this speciation is a function of the physico/chemical properties (e.g., pH) of the water. Efforts are underway to develop data describing the chronic toxicity of aluminum to aquatic organisms at hydrogen ion concentrations (i.e., pH) typical of natural environmental conditions (i.e., pH of 6). The study reported herein describes the chronic toxicity of aluminum, at a pH of 6.0, to the midge, Chironomus riparius. Use of this test organism qualifies as a level of organization (Phylum) to be used as part of the minimum taxonomic requirements for calculation of a predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for the freshwater aquatic compartment, within the context of a species sensitivity distribution approach (European Commission 2003). C. riparius were exposed to a series of aluminum concentrations for 28 days, starting as 1st instar larvae (3 days old). To allow for potential changes in aluminum speciation, exposure solutions were aged for a 3-hour equilibrium period. As the formation of insoluble chemical species was apparent through low dissolved and monomeric measurements, total Al was used to interpret the biological data in this study. Measured pH values in the test averaged 6.0 – 6.1 in waters immediately prior to organism exposure and averaged 6.5 – 6.7 within the test chambers. Nominal test concentrations ranged from 0 to 5,000 μg Al/L and total, dissolved, and monomeric aluminum were measured throughout the test. As the formation of insoluble chemical species was apparent through low dissolved measurements (all concentrations measuring below 66 μg Al/L), total Al was used to interpret the biological data in this study. The test had measured exposure concentrations ranging from 7.5 to 4281.8 μg total Al/L. A short-term endpoint of survival and growth was measured at day 10. The endpoints analyzed for the entire life-cycle test were adult emergence and reproduction. Additional short-term data of survival and growth was quantified at Day 10. There was no effect on organism short-term survival (at Day 10). The short-term growth endpoint at Day 10 (as ash-free dry weight) was affected at the two highest concentrations. Upon comparison of the full life-cycle chronic endpoints of adult emergence and reproduction (hypothesis testing), there was no statistically significant effect in any of the concentrations, resulting in a no-observable effect concentration (NOEC) and a lowest observable effect concentration (LOEC) of 4281.8 μg/L total Al and > 4281.8 μg/L total Al, respectively. Based upon point estimate analysis of the life-cycle endpoints, reproduction was the most sensitive endpoint, resulting in effective concentrations to reduce reproduction by 10% and 20% relative to control performance (EC10 and EC20 with 95% confidence intervals) of 1271.5 (109.4 – 14776.4) and 3387.0 (858.0 – 13373.0) μg/L total Al, respectively.
- Endpoint:
- sediment toxicity: long-term
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- assessment report
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Duration:
- 17 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 962.5 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: population size
- Duration:
- 17 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2 156.9 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: population size
- Duration:
- 17 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 987.9 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: population size
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 336.6 - 2899.4 µg/L
- Duration:
- 17 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 1 235.1 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 649.7 - 2347.9 µg/L
- Duration:
- 17 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1 923.9 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- element
- Remarks:
- total Al
- Basis for effect:
- other: population size
- Remarks on result:
- other: CL: 1368.1 - 2705.3 µg/l
- Details on results:
- /
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- /
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical analysis was performed using measured average total Al concentrations of newly prepared solutions. Differences in the population sizes at test termination were evaluated using statistical computer packages (Comprehensive Environmental Toxicity Information System [CETIS], Tidepool Scientific Software, McKinleyville, CA, USA and Toxicity Relationship Analysis Program [TRAP], Duluth, MN, USA). If the data met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity, the no-observable effect concentration (NOEC) and lowest- observable effect concentration (LOEC) were estimated using an analysis of variance to compare (p = 0.05) organism performance in the experimental treatments with that observed in the control. The effective concentrations to reduce population size by 10%, 20%, or 50% relative to control performance (EC10/EC20/EC50) were estimated using threshold sigmoid regression analysis. Exposure concentrations were log-transformed before determination of the EC10, EC20, and EC50 values. - Conclusions:
- Total measured exposure concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 4461 μg Al/L and resulted in a significant effect on organism population growth at the highest two treatments. The study resulted in a no observable effect concentration [NOEC] of 963 μg/L total Al and a lowest observable effect concentration [LOEC] of 2157 μg/L total Al for growth. The effective concentrations to reduce growth by 10% and 20% relative to control performance (EC10 and EC20 with 95% confidence intervals) was 988 (337 – 2899) and 1235 (650 – 2348) μg/L total Al, respectively.
- Executive summary:
As part of an environmental program designed to provide data for the setting of water quality standards, data describing the chronic toxicity of aluminum to a variety of aquatic organisms are needed. Aluminum toxicity is a function of the chemical species of aluminum present in the water and this speciation is a function of the physico/chemical properties (e.g., pH, temperature, hardness) of the water. Much of the existing aluminum toxicity data was conducted under “acid” water conditions (pH 4.5-5.5); therefore, efforts are underway to develop data describing the chronic toxicity of aluminum to aquatic organisms at hydrogen ion concentrations (i.e., pH) typical of natural environmental conditions. The study reported herein determines the chronic toxicity of aluminum, at a pH of 6.0, to an aquatic oligochaete, Aeolosoma sp. Aeolosoma sp. is a representative of family Oligochaeta. Use of this test organism qualifies as a level of organization (Phylum) not currently represented in the species sensitivity distribution used in the derivation of a predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for the freshwater aquatic compartment, within the context of a species sensitivity distribution approach (European Commission 2003). In this study, Aeolosoma sp. were exposed to a series of aluminum concentrations for seventeen days, starting as < 24 hour old organisms. To allow for possible changes in aluminum speciation, exposure solutions were aged for a 3-hour equilibrium period prior to organism exposure. Nominal test concentrations ranged from 0 to 4000 μg Al/L and total, dissolved, and monomeric aluminum were measured at test initiation. As the formation of insoluble chemical species was apparent through low dissolved and monomeric measurements (all concentrations measuring below 10 μg Al/L), total Al was used to interpret the biological data in this study. Total measured exposure concentrations ranged from 1 to 4461 μg Al/L and resulted in a significant effect on organism population growth at the highest two treatments. The study resulted in a no observable effect concentration [NOEC] of 963 μg/L total Al and a lowest observable effect concentration [LOEC] of 2157 μg/L total Al for growth. The effective concentrations to reduce growth by 10% and 20% relative to control performance (EC10 and EC20 with 95% confidence intervals) was 988 (337 – 2899) and 1235 (650 – 2348) μg/L total Al, respectively.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table: Summary of biological results
Average total aluminum (μg/l) | Proportion survived - Average ± Std Dev | Wet weight - Average ± Std. Dev |
5 | 1.00 ± 0 | 32.39 ±9.22 |
175.2 | 0.90 ± 0.32 | 31.34 ± 14.67 |
309.6 | 1.00 ± 0 | 31.68 ± 16.62 |
569.6 | 0.90 ± 0.32 | 31.96 ± 10.52 |
1092.0 | 0.67 ± 0.50 | 26.17 ± 8.94 |
2099.2 | 1.00 ± 0 | 15.45 ± 5.78 |
Table 1: Summary of statistics (continued)
Endpoint | Growth-Biomass | Growth - Dry weight | Reproduction | ||
28 -day | 42 -day | 28 -day | 42-day | 42 -day | |
EC20 (95% CI) | 199.3 (116.7 - 340.2) | 291.2 (119.9 - 706.8) | 207.0 (179.9 -238.2) | 277.7 (191.3 -403.0) | 197.7 (154.9 -252.3) |
EC50 (95% CI) | 387.2 (293.0 -511.7) | 474.0 (350.2 -641.5) | 380.6 (339.0 -427.3) | 443.3 (367.9 -534.1) | 264.8 (225.6 -310.8) |
Table 2: Summary of Total Metal Analyses (μg/L Al)
Nominal conc. | Total Al (µg/L) | |
Total average | Total Std Dev | |
0 | 2.2* | - |
28.1 | 30.9 | 6.8 |
56.3 | 53.1 | 11.8 |
112.5 | 123.2 | 23.9 |
225 | 232.6 | 28.0 |
450 | 453.8 | 66.0 |
* For calculation of average concentrations, the control water has been given a value of 2.2 μg/L Al (half the detection limit).
Table 3: Summary of Dissolved Metal Analyses (μg/L Al)
Nominal conc. | Dissolved aluminum (µg/L) | |
Dissolved average | Dissolved Std Dev. | |
0 | 2.2* | - |
28.1 | 3.7 | 2.1 |
56.3 | 6.5 | 3.4 |
112.5 | 11.0 | 3.0 |
225 | 15.6 | 5.4 |
450 | 36.0 | 19.3 |
* For calculation of average concentrations, samples below the detection limit are given a value of 2.2 μg/L Al (half the detection limit).
Table 4: Survival
Average measured Al conc. (µg/L) | Proportion survived (±SD) | ||
Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 | |
2.2 | 0.92 ± 0.10 | 0.84 ± 0.11 | 0.79 ± 0.15 |
30.9 | 0.83 ± 0.07 | 0.71 ± 0.15 | 0.69 ± 0.16 |
53.1 | 0.88 ± 0.07 | 0.86 ± 0.07 | 0.85 ± 0.08 |
123.2 | 0.79 ± 0.22 | 0.78 ± 0.27 | 0.75 ± 0.28 |
232.6 | 0.92 ± 0.07 | 0.80 ± 0.09 | 0.79 ± 0.11 |
453.8 | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 0.90 ± 0.11 | 0.88 ± 0.14 |
Table 5: Organism growth data (Biomass)
Average measured total Al conc (µg/L) | Average dry weight per original organism in mg ( ±SD)1 | |
Day 28 | Day 42 | |
2.2 | 0.419 ± 0.05 | 0.446 ± 0.09 |
30.9 | 0.379 ± 0.03 | 0.409 ± 0.07 |
53.1 | 0.367 ± 0.04 | 0.507 ± 0.05 |
123.2 | 0.321 ± 0.04* | 0.486 ± 0.14 |
232.6 | 0.295 ± 0.03* | 0.415 ± 0.09 |
453.8 | 0.155 ± 0.02* | 0.248 ± 0.04 |
1 Biomass (average dry weight per original organism) is reported as an average of all replicates within a treatment.
* Significantly less than control (p <= 0.05). SD = Standard Deviation
Table 6: Organism growth data
Average measured total Al conc. (µg/L) | Dry weight in mg ( ±SD)1 | |
Day 28 | Day 42 | |
2.2 | 0.474 ± 0.09 | 0.569 ± 0.07 |
30.9 | 0.446 ± 0.03 | 0.606 ± 0.07 |
53.1 | 0.435 ± 0.06 | 0.598 ± 0.06 |
123.2 | 0.442 ± 0.04 | 0.692 ± 0.15 |
232.6 | 0.338 ± 0.01* | 0.525 ± 0.07 |
453.8 | 0.183 ± 0.03* | 0.288 ± 0.06 |
1 Dry Weight is reported as the average weight per organism (combination of all replicates within a treatment).
* Significantly less than control (p <= 0.05)
Table 7: Organism reproduction data
Average measured total Al conc. (µg/L) | Average reproduction (± SD) (young/female)1 |
2.2 | 9.30 ± 3.69 |
30.9 | 9.36 ± 4.69 |
53.1 | 9.16 ± 4.02 |
123.2 | 7.89 ± 3.95 |
232.6 | 5.85 ± 3.02 |
453.8 | 0.46 ± 0.37* |
1 Reproduction is reported as the average number of young per female (sum of Day 35 and 42 divided by # of females; combination of all replicates within a treatment).
* Significantly less than control (p <= 0.05)
Table 1: Summary of total metal analyses (µg/L Al)
Nominal conc. | Total Aluminum | |||
Total average | Total Std Dev | Total average | Total Std Dev | |
with day 0 | without day 0 | |||
0 | 7.5* | - | 7.5* | - |
312.5 | 233.0 | 136.3 | 254.2 | 136.1 |
625 | 490.4 | 144.5 | 527.0 | 122.4 |
1250 | 1100.2 | 295.9 | 1184.0 | 230.3 |
2500 | 2132.7 | 436.4 | 2282.3 | 255.7 |
5000 | 4281.8 | 752.5 | 4568.2 | 294.5 |
* For calculation of average concentrations, the control water has been given a value of 7.5 μg/L Al (half the detection limit).
Table 2: Summary of dissolved metal analysis (µg/L Al)
Nominal conc. | Dissolved Al (µg/L) | |
Dissolved average* | Dissolved Std Dev | |
0 | <15 | - |
312.5 | <15 | - |
625 | <15 | - |
1250 | 28 | 26 |
2500 | 21 | 15 |
5000 | 17 | 21 |
* For average and standard deviation determinations, samples with values below the detection limit (< 15) are given a value of 7.5 ug/L Al (half the detection limit).
Table 3: Summary of monomeric metal analyses (µg/L Al)
Nominal conc. | Monomeric aluminum (µg/L) | |
Monomeric average* | Monomeric Std Dev | |
0 | < 10.8 | - |
312.5 | < 10.8 | 3.1 |
625 | < 10.8 | 3.8 |
1250 | < 10.8 | 4.1 |
2500 | 14.8 | 6.4 |
5000 | 38.2 | 17.5 |
* For average and standard deviation determinations, samples with values below the detection limit (< 10.8) are given a value of 5.4 ug/L Al (half the detection limit).
Table 4: Survival
Average measured total Al conc. (µg/L) | Proportion survided (±SD) 1 | |
Day 10 | Day 28 (as adult emergence) | |
7.5 | 0.8500 ± 0.06383 | 0.6833 ± 0.1168 |
233.0 | 0.9333 ± 0.07698 | 0.7667 ± 0.1182 |
490.4 | 0.8333 ± 0.1388 | 0.6833 ± 0.1944 |
1100.2 | 0.8667 ± 0.1089 | 0.8583 ± 0.09718 |
2132.7 | 0.8333 ± 0.08607 | 0.7167 ± 0.1054 |
4281.8 | 0.7167 ± 0.2396 | 0.6167 ± 0.1543 |
1 Survival is reported as the average survival within a treatment (combination of all replicates within a treatment).
SD = Standard Deviation
Table 5: Organism growth data - Ash free dry weight1
Average measured total Al concentration (µg/L) | Ash free dry weight (average weight per surviving organism) (in mg ± SD)) |
7.5 | 1.149 ± 0.1199 |
233 | 1.118 ± 0.1064 |
490.4 | 1.279 ± 0.2599 |
1100.2 | 0.9965 ± 0.1593 |
2132.7 | 0.8677 ± 0.1205 |
4281.8 | 0.7413 ± 0.0943 |
1Ash-Free Dry Weight is reported as the average weight per organism (combination of all replicates within a treatment).
* Significantly less than control (p <= 0.05)
SD =standard deviation
Table 6: Organism reproduction data
Average measured total Al conc. (µg/L) | Average reproduction (± SD) (number of eggs/case) |
7.5 | 337.8 ± 125.8 |
233.0 | 340.8 ± 137.0 |
490.4 | 349.3 ± 83.77 |
1100.2 | 288.7 ± 108.7 |
2132.7 | 298.2 ± 53.62 |
4281.8 | 269.6 ± 42.48 |
Table: Population size data
Average Total Aluminum (μg/l) | Average population (± Std Dev) |
0.5 | 65.3 ± 5.3 |
84.5 | 66.0 ± 13.8 |
480.6 | 78.3 ± 9.2 |
962.5 | 65.0 ± 15.9 |
2156.9 | 27.5 ± 6.8 |
4460.6 | 3.3 ± 2.6 |
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Several sediment studies are available on a variety of sediment dwelling species, some of which were directly referenced in the REACH guidance, others which were not but were based on published methodologies and performed in order to collect a large set of chronic data using an array of organisms with different habitats and feeding strategies in order to prepare a Species Sensitivity Distribution for aluminium. Recommended species tested were as follows: Chirmonus riparius, Hyalella azteca, Other species: The snail, Lymnaea stagnalis, the aquatic oligochaete, Aeolosoma sp. The robust summaries for these species have been compiled together with the results from aquatic toxicity studies, in the section "sediment toxicity" The robust summaries were compiled by the EAA consortium in the Aquatic Toxicity section. As the aluminium salts consortium acquired these robust summaries directly they have been included directly in the IUCLID in the sediment toxicity section. They are nonetheless complete.
Aluminium, aluminium powders and aluminium oxide are non hazardous (not classified for the environment). Other aluminium salts transform to practically insoluble forms within days and are no longer bioavailable. Aluminum (Al) is the most commonly occurring metallic element, comprising eight percent of the earth's crust (Press and Siever, 1974) and is therefore found in great abundance in both the terrestrial and sediment environments. Concentrations of 3-8% (30,000-80,000 ppm) are not uncommon. The relative contributions of anthropogenic aluminium to the existing natural pools of aluminium in soils and sediments is very small and therefore not relevant either in terms of added amounts or in terms of toxicity. Based on these exposure considerations additional sediment and/or soil testing is not warranted. More information about exposure based waiving for aluminium in soil and sediments can be found in attached document (White paper on exposure based waiving for Fe and Al in soils and sediments final 15-03-2010. pdf).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.