Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
The study was performed between 05 April 2005 and 25 April 2005. The final report was issed 10 June 2005.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2005
Report date:
2005

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Female Sprague-Dawley CD (Crl: CD® (SD) IGS BR) strain rats were supplied by Charles River (UK) Ltd, Margate, Kent, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The animals were nulliparous and non-pregnant. After an acclimatisation period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink-marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals were eight to twelve weeks of age. The bodyweights fell within an interval of ± 20% of the mean initial bodyweight of the first treated group.The animals were housed in groups of three in suspended solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately three to four hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (Certified Rat and Mouse Diet (Code 5LF2) supplied by BCM IPS Limited, London, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that would reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25°C and 30 to 70% respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Details on oral exposure:
A group of three fasted females was treated with the test material at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. This was followed by a further group of three fasted females at the same dose level.The test material was administered orally as a suspens.ion in arachis oil BP. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were dosed once only by gavage, using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe. The volume administered to each animal was calculated according to the fasted bodyweight at the time of dosing. Treatment of animals was sequential. Sufficient time was allowed between each group to confirm the survival of the previously dosed animals.All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
Doses:
single dose
No. of animals per sex per dose:
2 groups of 3 animals were dosed with 2000mg/kg
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days.Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to dosing and seven and fourteen days after treatment.At the end of the observation period the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross pathological examination. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities for examination of major organs. The appearance of any macroscopic abnonnalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.
Statistics:
None used

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
ca. 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No deaths were noted during the study.
Clinical signs:
other: There were no signs of systemic toxicity. Blue stained faeces was noted in all animals one and two days after dosing and persisted in three animals after dosing.
Gross pathology:
No abmormalities were noted

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The acute oral median lethal dose (LDso) of the test material in the female Sprague-Dawley CD strain rat was estimated as being greater than 2500 mg/kg bodyweight.
Executive summary:

Introduction

This study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test material following a single oral administration in the Sprague-Dawley strain rat. The method was designed to meet the requirements of OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals No. 423 Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method (adopted 17 December 2001)

Method

Two groups of three fasted females were treated with the test substance at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. The test item was administered orally as a solution in arachis oil BP. Clinical signs and bodyweight were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.

Results

Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. There were no deaths or systemic toxicity observed and all animals showed expected gains in bodyweight. No Abmormalities were noted at necropsy.

Conclusion

The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Sprague-Dawley CD strain rat was estimated from the flow chart in Appendix 1 as being greater than 2500 mg/kg bodyweight.