Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 856-079-4 | CAS number: 55860-35-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental start: 5 December 2017, experimental completion: 22 December 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-acetyl-2-methylbenzoic acid
- EC Number:
- 856-079-4
- Cas Number:
- 55860-35-0
- Molecular formula:
- C10H10O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-acetyl-2-methylbenzoic acid
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine locus (Salmonella typhimurium), genes for tryptophan biosynthesis (Escherichia coli)
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- A mammalian metabolic system was used (S9-mix). Phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 was used as the metabolic activation system. The S9 was prepared from male Wistar rats (RjHan:WI; weight approx. 220 – 320 g, Janvier Labs, 53941 Saint-Berthevin Cedex, France) induced by peroral administration of 80 mg/kg b.w. phenobarbital (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, 82024 Taufkirchen, Germany) and by peroral administrations of ß-naphthoflavone (Acros Organics, 2440 Geel, Belgium) each, on three consecutive days. The livers were prepared 24 hours after the last treatment. The S9 fractions were produced by dilution of the liver homogenate with a KCl solution (1+3 parts) followed by centrifugation at 9000 g. Aliquots of the supernatant were frozen and stored in ampoules at –80 °C. Small numbers of the ampoules can be kept at –20 °C for up to one week. Each batch of S9 mix was routinely tested with 2-aminoanthracene as well as benzo[a]pyrene.
The protein concentration in the S9 preparation was 32.6 mg/mL (lot no. 010617E) in the pre-experiment / Experiment I and 30.4 mg/mL (lot no. 261017K) in Experiment II. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-Experiment/Experiment I: 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II: 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Since no relevant cytotoxic effects were observed 5000 µg/plate was chosen as the maximal concentration in experiment II. - Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), Fisher Leics LE11 5RG, batch 1684307, purity 99.98%
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other:
- Remarks:
- NaN3: TA1535, TA100 (without S9-mix), 4-NOPD: TA1537, TA98 (without S9-mix), MMS: WP2 uvrA (pKM101), WP2 (pKM101) (without S9-mix), 2-AA: all strains (with S9-mix)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- For each strain and dose level including the controls, three plates were used.
The following materials were mixed in a test tube and poured onto the selective agar plates:
- 100 µL test solution at each dose level, solvent (negative control) or reference mutagen solution (positive control),
- 500 µL S9 mix (for test with metabolic activation) or S9 mix substitution buffer (for test without metabolic activation, 7 parts of the 100 mM sodium-ortho-phosphate-buffer pH 7.4 with 3 parts of KCl solution 0.15 M),
- 100 µL bacteria suspension (cf. test system, pre-culture of the strains),
- 2000 µL overlay agar
In the pre-incubation assay 100 µL test solution, 500 µL S9 mix / S9 mix substitution buffer and 100 µL bacterial suspensions were mixed in a test tube and shaken at 37° C for 60 minutes. After pre-incubation 2.0 mL overlay agar (45° C) was added to each tube. The mixture was poured on selective agar plates. After solidification the plates were incubated upside down for at least 48 hours at 37° C in the dark .
The test substance was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations in the plate incorporation test (Experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (Experiment II) using S. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, and TA100, and the E. coli strains WP2 uvrA pKM101 and WP2 pKM101.
In the pre-experiment the concentration range tested was 3 - 5000 µg/plate. The pre-experiment is reported as Experiment I since the acceptability criteria of the assay were met. Since no relevant cytotoxic effects were observed 5000 µg/plate was chosen as the maximal concentration in experiment II.
The assay was performed with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The concentration range included two logarithmic decades. - Rationale for test conditions:
- The test conditions were selected in accordance with the test guideline.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice the colony count of the corresponding solvent control is observed. A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration. An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment. A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative and solvent controls such an increase is not considered biologically relevant.
- Statistics:
- Not applicable
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No precipitation of the test item occurred up to the highest investigated dose. The plates incubated with the test item showed reduced background growth at 5000 µg/plate in experiment I. No cytotoxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation. No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the six tester strains was observed following treatment with the substance at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
In Experiment I, the data in the negative and solvent control of strain TA 100 without metabolic activation were slightly above the current historical control range however were considered acceptable for inclusion to the historical control data. Two out of three values each were weakly increased in these control groups. Besides, no relevant effect on the numbers of revertant colonies was observed in this experiment. Thus, this observation has no detrimental impact on the outcome and validity of this study.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of results of experiment I
|
|
| Revertant colony counts (mean ± SD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S9-mix | Test group | Concentration (μg/plate) | TA1535 | ± | TA1537 | ± | TA98 | ± | TA100 | ± | WP2 pKM101 | ± | WP2 uvrA pKM101 | ± |
- | DMSO |
| 13 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 31 | 5 | 214 | 23 | 197 | 11 | 334 | 21 |
- | Untreated |
| 9 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 37 | 9 | 235 | 37 | 240 | 19 | 376 | 21 |
- | Substance | 3 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 34 | 12 | 197 | 13 | 225 | 25 | 364 | 6 |
- |
| 10 | 13 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 36 | 10 | 199 | 6 | 211 | 19 | 351 | 22 |
- |
| 33 | 12 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 23 | 4 | 202 | 29 | 201 | 21 | 304 | 5 |
- |
| 100 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 26 | 5 | 201 | 26 | 215 | 24 | 316 | 18 |
- |
| 333 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 27 | 5 | 173 | 23 | 193 | 18 | 349 | 10 |
- |
| 1000 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 28 | 3 | 184 | 28 | 193 | 27 | 309 | 11 |
- |
| 2500 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 29 | 4 | 176 | 12 | 161 | 2 | 276 | 12 |
- |
| 5000 | 11 | 3 | 6 R | 1 | 39 R | 3 | 165 | 37 | 110 R | 20 | 250 R | 24 |
- | NaN3 | 10 | 1251 | 32 |
|
|
|
| 1944 | 199 |
|
|
|
|
- | 4-NOPD | 10 |
|
|
|
| 329 | 36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- | 4-NOPD | 50 |
|
| 141 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- | MMS | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3474 | 223 | 3610 | 285 |
+ | DMSO |
| 13 | 4 | 15 | 1 | 44 | 4 | 168 | 2 | 221 | 9 | 369 | 32 |
+ | Untreated |
| 9 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 43 | 5 | 196 | 3 | 259 | 8 | 404 | 36 |
+ | Substance | 3 | 13 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 47 | 1 | 154 | 11 | 237 | 23 | 421 | 18 |
+ |
| 10 | 10 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 38 | 2 | 183 | 6 | 221 | 17 | 409 | 3 |
+ |
| 33 | 14 | 4 | 15 | 1 | 33 | 10 | 168 | 18 | 208 | 23 | 364 | 24 |
+ |
| 100 | 12 | 5 | 13 | 3 | 35 | 2 | 179 | 5 | 172 | 34 | 344 | 35 |
+ |
| 333 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 4 | 39 | 9 | 163 | 8 | 214 | 8 | 411 | 23 |
+ |
| 1000 | 14 | 6 | 15 | 3 | 37 | 11 | 179 | 22 | 200 | 39 | 414 | 30 |
+ |
| 2500 | 9 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 39 | 2 | 159 | 30 | 189 | 33 | 342 | 32 |
+ |
| 5000 | 11 R | 1 | 12 R | 3 | 32 R | 4 | 168 R | 10 | 121 R | 15 | 251 R | 22 |
+ | 2-AA | 2.5 | 498 | 18 | 113 | 7 | 3406 | 251 | 3834 | 106 |
|
|
|
|
+ | 2-AA | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1218 | 75 | 2282 | 344 |
NaN3 = sodium azide, 2-AA = 2-aminoanthracene, 4-NOPD = 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine, MMS = methylmethanesulfonate, R = reduced background growth
Table 2: Summary of results of experiment II
|
|
| Revertant colony counts (mean ± SD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S9-mix | Test group | Concentration (μg/plate) | TA1535 | ± | TA1537 | ± | TA98 | ± | TA100 | ± | WP2 pKM101 | ± | WP2 uvrA pKM101 | ± |
- | DMSO |
| 9 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 23 | 4 | 142 | 7 | 172 | 9 | 312 | 34 |
- | Untreated |
| 12 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 192 | 9 | 235 | 13 | 342 | 19 |
- | Substance | 33 | 9 | 33 | 11 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 141 | 9 | 197 | 15 | 313 | 18 |
- |
| 100 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 149 | 16 | 183 | 7 | 298 | 20 |
- |
| 333 | 11 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 25 | 5 | 146 | 11 | 163 | 20 | 279 | 8 |
- |
| 1000 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 22 | 1 | 137 | 5 | 175 | 19 | 314 | 43 |
- |
| 2500 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 19 | 4 | 150 | 26 | 147 | 6 | 294 | 10 |
- |
| 5000 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 20 | 5 | 157 | 14 | 127 | 26 | 248 | 15 |
- | NaN3 | 10 | 1156 | 51 |
|
|
|
| 2031 | 205 |
|
|
|
|
- | 4-NOPD | 10 |
|
|
|
| 370 | 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- | 4-NOPD | 50 |
|
| 148 | 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- | MMS | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3272 | 471 | 2767 | 689 |
+ | DMSO |
| 8 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 29 | 4 | 118 | 11 | 211 | 15 | 357 | 20 |
+ | Untreated |
| 12 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 31 | 5 | 198 | 8 | 252 | 38 | 380 | 13 |
+ | Substance | 33 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 33 | 4 | 128 | 8 | 213 | 13 | 388 | 32 |
+ |
| 100 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 29 | 3 | 126 | 12 | 225 | 23 | 331 | 10 |
+ |
| 333 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 26 | 3 | 134 | 3 | 178 | 38 | 340 | 13 |
+ |
| 1000 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 29 | 3 | 138 | 21 | 229 | 19 | 362 | 25 |
+ |
| 2500 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 31 | 1 | 125 | 19 | 185 | 8 | 311 | 43 |
+ |
| 5000 | 7 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 27 | 8 | 151 | 10 | 123 | 31 | 278 | 53 |
+ | 2-AA | 2.5 | 374 | 44 | 117 | 7 | 2770 | 79 | 4570 | 732 |
|
|
|
|
+ | 2-AA | 10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1182 | 27 | 1809 | 135 |
NaN3 = sodium azide, 2-AA = 2-aminoanthracene, 4-NOPD = 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine, MMS = methylmethanesulfonate
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The substance was considered to be non-mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay with S. typhimurium and E. coli.
- Executive summary:
A study on the mutagenicity of the substance to bacteria was performed under GLP to OECD TG 471. The substance was tested in the plate incorporation test (Experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (Experiment II) using the Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, and TA100, and the Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains WP2 uvrA pKM101 and WP2 pKM101. In Experiment I the plates incubated with the substance showed reduced background growth in all strains at the highest concentration analysed (5000 μg/plate) in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix) with the exception of TA 1535 and TA 100 in the absence of metabolic activation. In Experiment II normal background growth was observed in all strains with and without metabolic activation. No cytotoxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in all strains with and without metabolic activation. No relevant increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the six tester strains was observed following treatment with the substance at any concentration level, neither in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. There was also no observed tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls, which showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. The substance was considered to be non-mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)