Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 625-732-3 | CAS number: 13029-09-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
OECD 439: not irritating to skin
OECD 437: not irritating to eye
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Oct 09, 2014 - Jan 29, 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- July 26, 2013
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Council Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006. B.40.bis. In vitro skin corrosion: human skin model test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- foreskin from a single donor
- Justification for test system used:
- standard model
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Remarks:
- No vehicle used in this study; The test item was applied neat to the tissues.
- Details on test system:
- CELL CULTURE
- Supplier: EpiSkin/SkinEthic Laboratories, Lyon, France)
- Source: human keratinocytes cultured on a polycarbonate filter in conditions which permit their terminal differentiation
- Format: 24 well plate
- Batch: 14-RHE-024
- Expires: Oct 27, 2014
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37°C
REMOVAL OF THE TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROL
At the end of the exposure periods, the test item, positive and negative control was removed immediately by gently rinsing with a minimum volume of 20 mL DPBS using a pipette. Excess DPBS was removed by gently shaking the tissue inserts and blotting the bottom of the tissue inserts with blotting paper. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 16 mg
- Concentration (if solution): n/a
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): n/a
- Concentration (if solution): n/a
- Lot/batch no. (if required): n/a
- Purity: n/a
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 16 µL
- Concentration (if solution): n/a
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 16 µL
- Concentration (if solution): 5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 42 min
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 42 hours
- Number of replicates:
- 3
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Mean relative viability in %
- Value:
- 106.04
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- The test item was applied neat to the tissues
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: none
- Direct-MTT reduction: none
- Colour interference with MTT: none
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
-Acceptability of the Quality Control Data of the Skin Model with Reference to Historical Batch Data:
The negative control OD values were 2.090, 2.057 and 2.044 and, thus, in the range of ≥0.8 and ≤3.0
-Acceptability of the Positive and Negative Control:
After treatment with the negative control (DPBS-buffer) the mean OD was 2.063 (standard deviation: 1.14%) and, thus, higher than the historically established boundary of 1.387.
After treatment with the positive control (5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate) the mean viability value was 1.20% (standard deviation: 7.43%) and, thus, lower than the historically established boundary of 3.58%.
The standard deviation of the negative control and the positive control was ≤18%, respectively.
-Test Substance Data Acceptance Criteria:
The standard deviation of the three tissues treated with the test item was 4.56% and, thus, ≤18%.
Therefore, the study fulfilled the validity criteria. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Non-corrosive
- Conclusions:
- This study was performed according to GLP and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 439. Under the conditions of the present study, the test item is not considered to be irritant to skin.
- Executive summary:
The objective of the present study was to investigate the potential of the test item to induce skin corrosion in anin vitrohuman skin model.
This in vitro study was performed to assess the irritation potential of the test material by means of the Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test. The test consisted of a topical exposure of the test item to a human reconstructed skin model followed by a cell viability test. Cell viability was quantitatively measured by dehydrogenase conversion of MTT into a blue formazan salt after extraction from tissues. The percent reduction of cell viability in comparison to untreated negative controls was used to predict the skin irritation potential.
The tissue viability after treatment with the test item was 83.09% and, thus, higher than 50%, i.e. according to UN GHS classification the test item is considered as non-irritant to skin.
Under the conditions of the present study, the test item is not considered to possess a corrosive potential to skin.
Reference
Group | Time / [min] | Mean OD | Mean Relative viability / [%] |
Negative Control | 42 | 2.515 | 100.00 |
Positive Control |
42 |
0.021 |
0.83 |
Test Material | 42 | 2.089 | 83.09 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Jul 28 - Oct 01, 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- 2013
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Version / remarks:
- Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1152/2010 amending, for the purpose of its adaption to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and the council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- PREPARATION OF THE TEST MATERIAL
The test item was prepared as a 20% (w/v) suspension in a 0.9% sodium chloride solution. The stability in the vehicle was not investigated. The test item preparation was administered within <1 hour after preparation. - Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL: 750 µL (i.e. 150mg/750µL)
NEGATIVE / VEHICLE CONTROL: 750 µL
Designation: 0.9% sodium chloride solution
Supplier: B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany
Batch: 13445011
Released until: September 2016
POSITIVE CONTROL: 750 µL
Designation: Art. 814223
Synonym: Imidazole
Supplier: Merck KGaA, Germany
Batch: S6746923
Released until: August 31, 2018
Imidazole was dissolved with 0.9% sodium chloride solution to a concentration of 20% (w/v). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- in vitro: triplicate design
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Run 1 / Experiment 1
- Value:
- -0.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: No observations (e.g. tissue peeling, residual test chemical, non-uniform opacity patterns) were seen in a visually inspection of the corneas after treatment.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control:
After treatment with the negative control (0.9% sodium chloride solution) the calculated IVIS was 0.6 and, thus, within two standard deviations of the current historical mean of the negative control (IVIS: -1.3 – 3.3).
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control:
After treatment with the positive control (20% Imidazole) the calculated IVIS was 105.4 and, thus, also within two standard deviations of the current historical mean of the positive control (IVIS 74.2 – 138.9).
Therefore, the study fulfilled the acceptance criteria. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the present study, the test item did not show an eye hazard potential. The test item is not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage (UN GHS: No Category).
- Executive summary:
The objective of the present study was to examine the potential of the test item to induce serious eye damage in the BCOP assay. The BCOP assay with isolated fresh bovine corneas is an acceptedin vitromodel for ocular hazard assessment.
After a first opacity measurement of the untreated bovine corneas, 750 µL of the suspended test item, positive or negative control were applied on the corneas and incubated for 240 minutes. After the incubation phase the test item, the positive, and the negative control were rinsed from the corneas and the opacity was measured again.
After the opacity measurements, the permeability of the corneas was determined by application of a fluorescein solution for 90 minutes. The amount of fluorescein solution that crossed the cornea was measured spectrophotometrically.
The opacity and permeability assessments were combined to determine anIn VitroIrritancy Score (IVIS).
The IVIS obtained after treatment was -0.2 and, thus lower than 3,i.e.according to OECD 437 the test item is not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage (UN GHS: No Category).
Reference
|
Opacity |
Permeability |
IVIS |
|||
per cornea |
per group (mean value) |
Standard deviation |
||||
Negative |
0.9% sodium chloride solution |
0.566 |
0.007 |
0.656 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
0.632 |
-0.001 |
0.617 |
||||
0.322 |
0.010 |
0.467 |
||||
Positive |
Imidazole |
79.434 |
1.370 |
99.977 |
105.4 |
6.0 |
70.979 |
2.722 |
111.802 |
||||
63.046 |
2.759 |
104.435 |
||||
Test item |
Test material preparation |
-0.880 |
0.016 |
-0.637 |
-0.2 |
0.4 |
-0.503 |
0.038 |
0.065 |
||||
-0.128 |
0.017 |
0.120 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In vitro skin irritation (OECD 439)
The tissue viability after treatment with the test item was 83.09% and, thus, higher than 50%, i.e. according to UN GHS classification the test item is considered as non-irritant to skin.
In vitro eye irritation (OECD 437)
The IVIS obtained after treatment was -0.2 and, thus lower than 3,i.e.according to OECD 437 the test item is not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage (UN GHS: No Category).
Justification for classification or non-classification
The information provided shows that the test material does not need to classified for skin or eye irritation according to the EU Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification,Labelling andPackaging of Substances and Mixtures.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.