Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
Data waiving:
study technically not feasible
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
According to hydrolysis test results, the hydrolysis rate is estimated to be within several minutes. The hydrolysis products have been identified to be 1-butanol and zirconium dioxide. The reproduction toxicity of the hydrolysis products were used for read-across.
Endpoint:
fertility, other
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: other
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Male SD rats (18/group) were exposed to concentration of 0, 3000, 6000 ppm 1-butanol for 6 weeks. The males were then mated to non-exposed females.
Separate groups of 15 pregnant females were exposed to the same concentrations from day 1 to 20 of gestation, and were allowed to deliver.
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Route of administration:
inhalation
Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
not specified
Vehicle:
air
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Duration of treatment / exposure:
male: 6 weeks before mating
female: day 1 - 20 of gestation
Frequency of treatment:
7 h/day
Dose / conc.:
0 ppm
Dose / conc.:
3 000 ppm
Dose / conc.:
6 000 ppm
No. of animals per sex per dose:
female 15; male 18
Control animals:
yes
Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
no effects observed
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Effect level:
ca. 6 000 ppm
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: pregnancy rate
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
Generation:
F1
Effect level:
ca. 6 000 ppm
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
developmental neurotoxicity
Key result
Reproductive effects observed:
no
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
6 000 ppm
Treatment related:
no
Conclusions:
The NOAEL for maternal and paternal animals, and their offspring was 6000 ppm (18189 mg/m3)
Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
18 189 mg/m³
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

No studies were conducted on the target substance, zirconium tetrabutanolate. As the target substance hydrolyses rapidly (half-life < 5 minutes) the intrinsic properties are related to hydrolysis products of the target substance, 1 -butanol.

No detectable effect on pregnancy rate was found for Sprague-Dawley rats for females (15/group) exposed throughout gestation or males (18) exposed for six weeks prior to mating unexposed females for inhalation exposure levels of 3,000 or 6,000 ppm 1-butanol (Nelson et al., 1989).

Effects on developmental toxicity

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the studies, there's no adverse effect on reproduction observed. Therefore, there is no need for classification as reproductive toxicity according to CLP Regulation.

Additional information