Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 224-736-9 | CAS number: 4468-02-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Two main studies on skin sensitisation are identified in a read-across approach. The LLNA study (ikarashi et al.) is the main study used for assessing the potential for skin sensitisation.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1999
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The read-across hypothesis is instantaneous dissociation of zinc gluconate into zinc cations (Zn2+) and gluconate anions in aqueous media (environmental compartments and body fluids). Thus, for endpoints where no zinc gluconate data exist, the assessment of the (eco-) toxicological effects can be based on available data of dissociable zinc compounds and gluconate derivatives.
The assessment of human and environmental toxicology is mainly based on the zinc ion, which is considered to be toxicologically more relevant than the gluconate ion (see complete justification report attached).
All of the zinc based read-across partners have in common that they dissociate into zinc and the respective counter ion in aqueous media as described above. The same is true for all of the gluconate based read-across partners, as they dissociate into the gluconate anion and the respective counter ion in aqueous media.
The gluconate derivatives are tentatively ignored for the purpose of this read-across due to the role of gluconates as common additives or nutritional supplements in food and due to the fact that gluconate/gluconic acid is a ubiquitous metabolic product/substrate in mammals with proven low toxicity. As a normal metabolic product of glucose metabolism, 25–30 g are being produced daily in humans. It can safely be concluded that systemic toxicity need not be expected to arise from gluconates/gluconic acid when assessing the potential effects of zinc gluconate. Nevertheless, the lack of toxicological relevance of gluconates is addressed in sufficient detail in the final read-across report targeted at supporting this dossier.
When resorting to dissociable zinc read-across partners, there is a risk of confounding effects that might actually be attributable to the counter ion. The dissociation products of the aforementioned zinc compounds are glycerol, sulphate and chloride ions. The counter ions of the gluconates are sodium, calcium and manganese. All these ions play an important role in the physiology of man and other species. Considering this information, the respective counter ions (calcium, sodium, manganese) are unlikely to contribute to any confounding effects hence do need to be further addressed in this report.
Taking into account the global approach and the detailed explanation (including data matrix and analysis for each endpoint) provided in the report attached, the present read-across is considered relevant. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 50%
- Adequacy of challenge:
- not specified
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 5
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- skin reactions of grade 1
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 4
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- skin reactions of grade 1
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Clinical observations:
- skin reactions of grade 1
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Clinical observations:
- skin reactions of grade 1
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Zinc sulphate do not induce hypersensitivity in experimental animals. This conclusion can be used in a read-across approach (on analogue).
- Executive summary:
The skin sensitising potential of zinc sulphate (ZnSO4.7H2O) was investigated in guinea pigs. A well-performed maximisation test, conducted according to Directive 96/54/EC B.6 and OECD guideline 406, was carried out in female Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs.
Based on the results of a preliminary study, in the main study 10 experimental animals were intradermally injected with a 0.1% concentration and epidermally exposed to a 50% concentration. Five control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle (water) alone. Approximately 24 h before the epidermal induction exposure all animals were treated with 10% SDS. Two weeks after the epidermal application all animals were challenged with a 50% test substance concentration and the vehicle. A second challenge followed one week after the first.
In response to the 50% test substance concentration, in some experimental animals and controls skin reactions of grade 1 were observed 48 hours after the first (5/10 and 2/5, respectively) and the second challenge (4/10 and 2/5, respectively).
As the skin reactions were comparable among the experimental and control animals, and as there was poor consistency of the skin reactions among individual experimental animals after the first and second challenge, the observed skin reactions can be considered to be non-specific signs of irritation.
Hence, it can be concluded that zinc sulphate did not induce hypersensitivity in experimental animals.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1992
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The read-across hypothesis is instantaneous dissociation of zinc gluconate into zinc cations (Zn2+) and gluconate anions in aqueous media (environmental compartments and body fluids). Thus, for endpoints where no zinc gluconate data exist, the assessment of the (eco-) toxicological effects can be based on available data of dissociable zinc compounds and gluconate derivatives.
The assessment of human and environmental toxicology is mainly based on the zinc ion, which is considered to be toxicologically more relevant than the gluconate ion (see complete justification report attached).
All of the zinc based read-across partners have in common that they dissociate into zinc and the respective counter ion in aqueous media as described above. The same is true for all of the gluconate based read-across partners, as they dissociate into the gluconate anion and the respective counter ion in aqueous media.
The gluconate derivatives are tentatively ignored for the purpose of this read-across due to the role of gluconates as common additives or nutritional supplements in food and due to the fact that gluconate/gluconic acid is a ubiquitous metabolic product/substrate in mammals with proven low toxicity. As a normal metabolic product of glucose metabolism, 25–30 g are being produced daily in humans. It can safely be concluded that systemic toxicity need not be expected to arise from gluconates/gluconic acid when assessing the potential effects of zinc gluconate. Nevertheless, the lack of toxicological relevance of gluconates is addressed in sufficient detail in the final read-across report targeted at supporting this dossier.
When resorting to dissociable zinc read-across partners, there is a risk of confounding effects that might actually be attributable to the counter ion. The dissociation products of the aforementioned zinc compounds are glycerol, sulphate and chloride ions. The counter ions of the gluconates are sodium, calcium and manganese. All these ions play an important role in the physiology of man and other species. Considering this information, the respective counter ions (calcium, sodium, manganese) are unlikely to contribute to any confounding effects hence do need to be further addressed in this report.
Taking into account the global approach and the detailed explanation (including data matrix and analysis for each endpoint) provided in the report attached, the present read-across is considered relevant. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Positive control results:
- Not reported
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.41
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10 % zinc sulfate
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test, the test material was determined to be non-sensitising to mice.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to evaluate the skin sensitisation potential of the test material in mouse using a modified Local Lymph Node Assay. No guideline or GLP compliance was documented in the study report.
Groups of BALB/c mice (n=3) were treated with 10% concentration of test material or vehicle (20% ethanol solution) by applying 25 µL to the dorsum of both abraded ears for three consecutive days. Four days following the initial application, draining lymph nodes were excised. A single cell suspension of LNC was prepared and the incorporation of [3H]TdR was measured using a liquid scintillation counter.
[3H]TdR incorporation (expressed as mean counts per min (cpm) ± standard deviation per node x 10-3) was 2.14 ± 0.77 and the ratio of the proliferation in treated group to that in vehicle control (stimulation index) was 1.41.
Hence, under the conditions of the test, the test material was determined to be non-sensitising to mice.
Referenceopen allclose all
As the skin reactions were comparable among the experimental and control animals, and as there was poor consistency of the skin reactions among individual experimental animals after the first and second challenge, the observed skin reactions can be considered to be non-specific signs of irritation.
Disintegrations per minute (DPM): Mean value cpm ± SD ( x 10-3) = 2.14 ± 0.77
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Justification for classification or non-classification
No potential for skin sensitisation is identified in the existing studies. Thus, no classification is needed according to GHS criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)