Butylhydroxyoxostannane

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference

Reference 1

Endpoint:

toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

25 September 2002 to 08 November 2002

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

other: read-across target

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)

Deviations:

yes

Remarks:

Please see "Principles on method if other than guideline" for further information

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)

Deviations:

yes

Remarks:

Please see "Principles on method if other than guideline" for further information

Principles of method if other than guideline:

The medium contained 150 mg/L NaHCO3 (not 50 mg/L as specified in the OECD Guideline, this in order to improve the buffer capacity of the medium). Furthermore, the medium contained Fe-citrate because the growth of the algae can become erratic in the absence of complexed iron.
Furthermore, the duplicate samples for analysis were not stored in a refrigerator, but in a freezer. The stored samples were not analysed.

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Analytical monitoring:

yes

Details on sampling:

At the start of the growth inhibition test, duplicate samples were taken from all media containing all nominal test material concentrations tested together with a control. At the end of the test, duplicate samples were taken from the media containing the same test material concentrations with algae. The sample volume was 100 mL except for the highest test material concentration where the sample volume was 10 mL. One of the duplicate sample series at the start and at the end of the test was analysed.

Vehicle:

no

Details on test solutions:

40.8 mg test material was dissolved in 250 mL algal medium. Dilutions were then prepared in medium so as to yield the final test material concentration series.

Test organisms (species):

Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)

Details on test organisms:

The fresh-water green alga Scenedesmus subspicatus (SAG 86.81) was used as the test organism. The culture was supplied by the Collection of Algal Cultures, Institute for Plant Physiology, University of Gottingen, Nikolausberger Weg 18, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany.

A pre-culture of algae in the exponential growth phase was prepared as detailed in OECD 201. The initial inoculum cell density was 0.3 x 10E4 cells/mL to obtain the appropriate biomass level in the test medium.

Test type:

static

Water media type:

freshwater

Limit test:

no

Total exposure duration:

72 h

Post exposure observation period:

Not applicable.

Hardness:

Hardness, mg equivalent CaCO3/L = 24.2

Test temperature:

23.7 - 23.9°C

pH:

At the beginning of the test: 7.9 - 8.0
At the end of the test: 8.0 - 8.1

Nominal and measured concentrations:

At the beginning of the test - 0, 0.004, 0.020, 0.053, 0.170, 0.50, 2.1 mg/L (measured)

0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.10, 0.32, 1.0, 3.2 mg/L (nominal)

Details on test conditions:

The medium was prepared from concentrated stock solutions in ultra pure water. It was sterilised by micropore filtration and contained 150 mg/L NaHCO3 (not 50 mg/L as specified in the OECD Guideline, this in order to improve the buffer capacity of the medium). Furthermore, the medium contained Fe-citrate because the growth of the algae can become erratic in the absence of complexed iron. The following solutions of test material were made:

- For the range-finding test, an amount of 100.6 mg test material was dissolved in 1000 mL algal medium. Dilutions were then prepared in medium so as to yield the final test material concentration series. Nominal inoculcum cell density was 0.8 x 10E4 cells/mL.
* The test was carried out in duplicate with four controls containing algae only, and a single background series containing test material without algae

- For the growth inhibition test, an amount of 40.8 mg test material was dissolved in 250 mL algal medium. Dilutions were then prepared in medium so as to yield the final test material concentration series. Nominal inoculum cell density of 0.3 x 10E4 cells/mL.
* The test was carried out in triplicate with six controls containing algae only and a single background concentration series containing test material without algae

Light intensity = 63-72 umol/s/m^-2

Reference substance (positive control):

no

Key result

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

NOEC

Effect conc.:

0.012 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Key result

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

EC50

Effect conc.:

0.31 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Remarks on result:

other: 0.25-0.40 (95% confidence limits)

Key result

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

EC50

Effect conc.:

0.107 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Basis for effect:

biomass

Remarks on result:

other: 0.04-0.13 (95% confidence limits)

Details on results:

The range-finding test revealed that inhibiting effects could be expected at test material concentrations of > 0.01 mg/L.

Reported statistics and error estimates:

EC values with respect to growth rate during and exponential growth were calculated by means of a parametric model developed by Kooijman et al, assuming a constant error per measurement. EC values with respct to the area under the growth curve were calculated by the method given in the OECD guideline. The values were calculated by linear interpolation of a plot of the percentage reduction in growth against the log concentration of the test material.

The NOEC was determined as the highest concentration at which no statistically significant inhibition was observed. Model calculations carried out using the DEBtox software package according to Dynamic Energy Budgets Theory developed by Kooijman and Bedaux. Model parameters for population growth and their asymptotic standard deviation and correlation coefficients were estimated. The NOEC was calculated from the Profile Ln Likelihood Function.

Table 1. Results of the analysis of the concentration of test material in the algal test media at the start and end of the test

Nominal Concentration (mg/L)	Measured concentration of the Test Material
	0 h (mg/L)	% of nominal	68 h (mg/L)	% of nominal	Geometric mean (mg/L)	Geometric mean (% of nominal)
0.00	<0.002	-	<0.002	-	-	-
0.01	0.004	40.0	0.003	30.0	0.004	41
0.03	0.020	62.5	0.014	43.8	0.012	41
0.10	0.053	53.0	0.041	41.0	0.040	42
0.32	0.170	53.1	0.088	27.5	0.130	42
1.0	0.500	50.0	0.200	20.0	0.430	43
3.2	2.100	65.6	1.360	42.5	1.380	43

Table 2. Mean particle size (µm, corrected for background) in the growth inhibition test

Time (h)	Nominal concentration of the Test Material (mg/L)
	0	0	0.01	0.03	0.10	0.32	1.00	3.20
0	112	112	112	112	112	112	112	112
23	120	122	118	123	107	88	92	89
44	105	106	113	124	125	110	80	77
68	78	82	99	132	148	117	57	69

Validity criteria fulfilled:

yes

Conclusions:

Under the conditions of the study, the 72-hour ErC50 was determined to be ErC50 = 0.31 (0.25 -0.40) mg/L and the 72-hour NOEC, in terms of growth rate, was determined to be NOEC = 0.012 mg/L.

Executive summary:

The toxicity of the test material to the fresh water green alga Scenedesmus subspicatus was determined in a 72 -h growth inhibition test according to the srtandardised guidelines OCED 201 and EU Method C.3, under GLP conditions. The test fulfilled the validity criteria listed in the guideline. Growth was sufficient and there was a minimal increase of the test media pH values.

The nominal concentrations of the test material were 0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.10, 0.32, 1.0 and 3.2 mg/L and were added to the algal growth medium. The measured concentrations of the test material at the start of the test were 0, 0.004, 0.020, 0.053, 0.170, 0.05 and 2.1 mg/L and these values were 40, 62.5, 53, 53.1, 50 and 65.6 % respectively of the nominal concentrations. The measured concentrations of the test material at the end of the test were 30, 43.8, 41, 27.5, 20 and 42.5 % respectively of the nominal concentrations. The geometric means of the measured concentrations of the test material at the start and end of the test were used for the calculation of the effect values.

Under the conditions of the study, the 72-hour ErC50 was determined to be ErC50 = 0.31 (0.25 -0.40) mg/L and the 72-hour NOEC, in terms of growth rate, was determined to be NOEC = 0.012 mg/L.

The statistical assessment of these data support the conclusion that there was a significant effect only on the growth rate of S. subspicatus in a 72-h growth inhibition test and it is concluded that the ErC50 value of 0.31 mg/L based on measured concentration of the test material represents the best estimate of the mean effect concentration of the test material on algal growth.

Reference 2

Endpoint:

toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Type of information:

read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

supporting study

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: Study conducted on read-across material

Justification for type of information:

Read across to structurally similar substance monobutyltin trichloride (MBTC, CAS No.: 1118-46-3), see attached justification.

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Key result

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

NOEC

Effect conc.:

0.012 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Key result

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

EC50

Effect conc.:

0.31 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Remarks on result:

other: 0.25-0.40 (95% confidence limits)

Key result

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

EC50

Effect conc.:

0.107 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Basis for effect:

biomass

Remarks on result:

other: 0.04-0.13 (95% confidence limits)

Description of key information

Read across to structurally similar substance monobutyltin trichloride (MBTC, CAS No.: 1118-46-3).

Oldersma (2003)

Under the conditions of the study, the 72-hour ErC50 was determined to be ErC50 = 0.31 (0.25 -0.40) mg/L and the 72-hour NOEC, in terms of growth rate, was determined to be NOEC = 0.012 mg/L.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater algae:

0.31 mg/L

EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:

0.012 mg/L

Additional information

Read across to structurally similar substance monobutyltin trichloride (MBTC, CAS No.: 1118-46-3).

The toxicity of the test material to the fresh water green alga Scenedesmus subspicatuswas determined in a 72 -h growth inhibition test according to the srtandardised guidelines OCED 201 and EU Method C.3, under GLP conditions. The study was awarded a reliability score of 2 in accordance with the criteria set forth by Klimisch et al. (1997).

The nominal concentrations of the test material were 0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.10, 0.32, 1.0 and 3.2 mg/L and were added to the algal growth medium. The measured concentrations of the test material at the start of the test were 0, 0.004, 0.020, 0.053, 0.170, 0.05 and 2.1 mg/L and these values were 40, 62.5, 53, 53.1, 50 and 65.6 % respectively of the nominal concentrations. The measured concentrations of the test material at the end of the test were 30, 43.8, 41, 27.5, 20 and 42.5 % respectively of the nominal concentrations. The geometric means of the measured concentrations of the test material at the start and end of the test were used for the calculation of the effect values.

Under the conditions of the study, the 72-hour ErC50 was determined to be ErC50 = 0.31 (0.25 -0.40) mg/L and the 72-hour NOEC, in terms of growth rate, was determined to be NOEC = 0.012 mg/L.

The statistical assessment of these data support the conclusion that there was a significant effect only on the growth rate of S. subspicatus in a 72-h growth inhibition test and it is concluded that the ErC50 value of 0.31 mg/L based on measured concentration of the test material represents the best estimate of the mean effect concentration of the test material on algal growth.

The test fulfilled the validity criteria listed in the guideline. Growth was sufficient and there was a minimal increase of the test media pH values.