Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 283-144-9 | CAS number: 84540-50-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 05.01. - 26.01.2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The 50% formulation used for the first induction of the additional animals was prepared within 5 h prior to treatment. An effect on the stability of the substance was not to be expected. The protocol deviation did not adversely affect the study integrity.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reference substance 001
- Cas Number:
- 80419-48-3
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- beige powder
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Analogy
CAS 80419-48-3
2-Chlor-3-amino-6-methylphenol x HCl
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- 30 females, nulliparous and non-pregnant
Age: approx. 11 weeks
Body weight: variation was within +/- 20% of the sex mean
Conditions:
Animals were housed in a controlled environment, in which optimal conditions were considered to be approximately 15 air changes per hour, a temperature of 21.0 ± 3.0°C (actual range: 18.9 - 22.2°C), a relative humidity of 30-70% (actual range: 33 - 72%) and 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours darkness per day. Cleaning procedures in the room might have caused the temporary fluctuations above the optimal maximum level of 70% for relative humidity.
Based on laboratory historical data, these fluctuations were considered not to have affected the study integrity.
Accommodation:
Individual housing in labelled Macrolon cages (type I; height 12.5 cm) containing purified sawdust as bedding material (Woody-Clean type 3/4; Tecnilab-BMI BV, Someren, The Netherlands). Certificates of analysis were examined and then retained in the NOTOX archives. The acclimatisation period was at least 5 days before the start of treatment under laboratory conditions. Animals were group housed in polycarbonate cages (Macrolon II type; height 15 cm) during the acclimatisation period.
Diet:
Free access to standard pelleted laboratory animal diet (from Altrom in (code VRF 1 ), Lage, Germany).
Water:
Free access to tap-water.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Details on study design:
- Preliminary irritation study
A preliminary irritation study was conducted in order to select the highest test substance concentration to be used in the main study. In principle, this concentration should be well tolerated systemically by the animals and may give moderate irritation (grade 3) at the highest.
A series of four test substance concentrations were tested, the highest concentration being the maximum concentration that could technically be applied. The starting- and subsequent concentrations were taken from the series: 100% (undiluted), 50%, 25%, 10%, 5%, 2.5%, 1 % and if needed further lower concentrations using the same steps. The test system, procedures and techniques were identical to those used during days 1 to 3 of the main study unless otherwise specified.
Four young adult animals were selected (5-14 weeks old). Each animal was treated with one concentration on two consecutive days. Approximately 4 hours after the last exposure, the skin was cleaned of residual test substance with water and the irritation was assessed. No necropsy was performed and no bodyweights were determined after termination.
Main study
lnitially, four groups of five animals were treated with the vehicle and three test substance concentrations respectively. Based on the results, two additional groups were treated with the vehicle and the highest test substance concentration.
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- other: ethanol:water (7:3 v/v)
- Concentration:
- 5%, 25% and 50%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 5
- Details on study design:
- Test substance concentrations selected for the main study were based on the results of a preliminary study.
In the main study, three groups of five experimental animals were epidermally exposed to a 5%, 25% and 50% concentration respectively on three consecutive days. Five vehicle control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (Ethanol:water 7:3 v/v).
Three days after the last exposure, all animals were injected with 3H-methyl thymidine and after five hours the draining (auricular) lymph nodes were excised.
After precipitating the DNA of the lymph node cells, radioactivity measurements were done.
Results and discussion
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- experimental
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- 5% test substance
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- experimental
- Value:
- 0.9
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25% test substance
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- experimental
- Value:
- 4
- Test group / Remarks:
- 50% test substance
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- experimental
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- 50% test substance
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- vehicle control, ethanol:water (7:3 v/v)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not sensitising
- Conclusions:
- The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5 and 25% were 1.0 and 0.9 respectively.
The SI of 4.0, calculated for the initially treated group at 50%, was not confirmed in the additionally group treated at 50% that showed a SI of 1.0. Based on the individual SI's, an overall SI of 2.5 was calculated.
There was no clear evidence that the test substance could elicit a SI >= 3.
Based on these results and according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines (OECD No.429, EC B.42 and EPA OPPTS 870.2600), A 094 should not be regarded as a skin sensitiser.
Based on these results and according to the:
- OECD Harmonized lntegrated Hazard Classification System for Human Health and Environmental Effects of Chemical Substances (OECD, 1998), A 094 does not have to be classified for sensitisation by skin contact.
- EC criteria for classification and labelling requirements for dangerous substances and preparations (Council Directive 67/548/EEC), A 094 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for sensitisation by skin contact. - Executive summary:
Assessment for Contact Hypersensitivity to A 094 in the Mouse (Local Lymph Node Assay).
The study was carried out based on the guidelines described in: OECD, Section 4, Health Effects, No.429 (2002), Paris Cedex; EC, Council Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex IV C, B.42 (Draft) (2001 ); Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.2600. "Skin Sensitisation" 2003.
Test substance concentrations selected for the main study were based on the results of a preliminary study.
In the main study, three groups of five experimental animals were epidermally exposed to a 5%, 25% and 50% concentration respectivelyon three consecutive days. Five vehicle control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (Ethanol:water 7:3 v/v).
Three days after the last exposure, all animals were injected with 3H-methyl thymidine and after five hours the draining (auricular) lymph nodes were excised.
After precipitating the DNA of the lymph node cells, radioactivity measurements were done.
The majority of nodes were equal in size, except for the nodes of one animal treated at 50%. No other macroscopic abnormalities of the nodes were noted.
Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 5, 25 and 50% were 111, 107 and 452 respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 113.
In order to clarify the response at 50%, additional groups of animals were treated. A mean DPM/animal value for the experimental group treated with a test substance concentration of 50% was 372. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 381.
The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5 and 25% were 1.0 and 0.9 respectively.
The SI of 4.0, calculated for the initially treated group at 50%, was not confirmed in the additionally group treated at 50% that showed a SI of 1.0. Based on the individual Sl's, an overall SI of 2.5 was calculated.
There was no clear evidence that the test substance could elicit a SI >= 3.
Based on these results and according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines (OECD No.429, EC B.42 and EPA OPPTS 870.2600), A 094 should not be regarded as a skin sensitiser.
Based on these results and according to the:
- OECD Harmonized lntegrated Hazard Classification System for Human Health and Environmental Effects of Chemical Substances (OECD, 1998), A 094 does not have to be classified for sensitisation by skin contact.
- EC criteria for classification and labelling requirements for dangerous substances and preparations (Council Directive 67/548/EEC), A 094 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for sensitisation by skin contact.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.