Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Justification for type of information:
Data is from peer reviewed journal

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Quaternary Silsesquioxane: A Developmental Toxicity Study in Rats
Author:
Waheed H. Siddiqui And Raymond G. York
Year:
1993
Bibliographic source:
Fundamental And Applied Toxicology 21, 66 - 70 (1993)

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: as mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The developmental toxicity of an antimicrobial organosilicon quaternary ammonium chloride (Quaternary Silsesquioxane) was evaluated in rats.
Study was conducted according to The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dimethyloctadecyl[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ammonium chloride
EC Number:
248-595-8
EC Name:
Dimethyloctadecyl[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ammonium chloride
Cas Number:
27668-52-6
Molecular formula:
C26H58NO3Si.Cl
IUPAC Name:
dimethyl(octadecyl)[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]azanium chloride
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Quaternary Silsesquioxane
IUPAC Name:
Quaternary Silsesquioxane
Test material form:
other: Liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report):Quaternary Silsesquioxane
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance):C26H58CL1N1O3Si1
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance):496.30g/mol
- Substance type:Organic
- Physical state:Liquid

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
-Sex: Female
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. (Portage, MI).
- Age at study initiation: 13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 206 to 275 g at gestation day 0
- Fasting period before study: No data available
- Housing: Animal were housed individually, except during mating, in suspended stainless steel wire mesh cages from receipt until sacrifice.
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): No data available
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): basal laboratory diet of Certified Rodent Chow 5002 (Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 12 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 -20°C
- Humidity (%):Relative humidity: 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): No data available
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: No data available

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
not specified
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on exposure:
Details on oral exposure
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Quat-Silsesquioxane was suspended fresh daily in corn oil

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): No data available
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): No data available
- Storage temperature of food: No data available

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): corn oil.
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 ml/kg.
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Proof of pregnancy: Copulatory plug was designated Day 0 of gestation
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 days
Frequency of treatment:
Single daily dose
Duration of test:
20 days of gestation
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day
Basis:
no data
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Total: 100
0 mg/kg/day: 25 female
100 mg/kg/day: 25 female
300 mg/kg/day: 25 female
10000 mg/kg/day: 25 female
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Dosage levels were selected from the results obtained in a range-finding developmental toxicity study. In that study neither maternalnor developmental toxicity was seen at dosage levels of up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Mated females were assigned consecutively, in the order the mating was detected
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: No data available
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups:No data available
- Section schedule rationale (if not random):No data available

Examinations

Maternal examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included. For changes in appearance, behavior and mortality.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily on Gestation Days 0,6,9, 12, 16, and 20.

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available

WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data available
- Time schedule for examinations: No data available

other:
organ weight: liver and gravid uterine weight was recorded
Ovaries and uterine content:
Nongravid Uteri were examined for Corpora lutea, Total implantation and Postimplantation loss.
Fetal examinations:
viable fetuses, crown-rump length, fetal body weight and sex ratio, gross pathology and histopathology were examined.
Statistics:
Mean maternal body weights and liver weights, maternal feed consumption, numbers of corpora lutea, total implantations,live fetuses, gravid uterine weight, and mean fetal body weights were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance, and the appropriate t test for equal and unequal variance (Steel and Torrie, 1960) using Dunnett's multiple comparison(Dunnett, 1964). The proportions of resorbed and dead fetuses and postimplantation losses were compared by the Mann-Whitney t/test (Siegel,1956). Male to female fetal sex ratios and the proportions of litters with malformations and developmental variations were compared using the x1 test criterion with Yate's correction for 2 X 2 contingency tables and/or
Fisher's exact probability test (Siegel, 1956; Weil, 1970). All statistical analyses compared the mean values of the treated groups with those of the
control, with the levels of significance at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01.
Indices:
Viability, Fertility and gestation were examined
Historical control data:
No data available

Results and discussion

Results: maternal animals

General toxicity (maternal animals)

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not specified
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Immunological findings:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Gross pathological findings:
not specified
Neuropathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
not specified
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Details on results:
Mortality – No effect on survival of treated female rats were observed as compared to control.

Clinical signs- No clinical signs or behavioral changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.

Body weights – No body weight changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.

Feed consumption - No feed consumption changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.

Organ weight - Slight but significant increase in relative liver weight of treated female rats was observed as compared to control.

Maternal developmental toxicity

Number of abortions:
not specified
Pre- and post-implantation loss:
no effects observed
Total litter losses by resorption:
no effects observed
Early or late resorptions:
no effects observed
Dead fetuses:
not specified
Changes in pregnancy duration:
not specified
Description (incidence and severity):
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): not specified
Changes in number of pregnant:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Reproductive function: estrous cycle:
No adverse effects on mean number of corpora lutea, number of live fetuses per litter, litter size, mean fetal body weight, or mean crown-rump length.

Reproductive performance:
Ratio of male and female pups at the 1000 mg/ kg/day dose level was significantly different from the control group but was not considered treatment related.


Effect levels (maternal animals)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
300 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: maternal toxicity

Maternal abnormalities

Abnormalities:
not specified
Localisation:
not specified

Results (fetuses)

Fetal body weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): no effects observed
Reduction in number of live offspring:
no effects observed
Changes in sex ratio:
no effects observed
Changes in litter size and weights:
not specified
Changes in postnatal survival:
not specified
External malformations:
no effects observed
Skeletal malformations:
no effects observed
Visceral malformations:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
No developmental parameter such as viability, fetal body weight and external malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. One fetus with bent limb bones, two fetuses from different mothers with microphthalmia and two other fetuses with omphalocele were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day and single fetus with multiple malformations were observed at 300 mg/kg/day in treated fetuses as compared to control. The incidence of developmental variations in the treated litters was not significantly increased over the control incidence.

Effect levels (fetuses)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
changes in sex ratio
fetal/pup body weight changes
external malformations

Fetal abnormalities

open allclose all
Abnormalities:
not specified
Abnormalities:
not specified
Localisation:
other: not specified

Overall developmental toxicity

Developmental effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

TABLE 1

Summary of Maternal Body Weight Gain, Food Consumption, and Liver Weights

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

Gestation day

0

100

300

1000

 

Mean body weight change (g)

0-6

26 ± 7a

25 ±7

27 ±7

29 ±8

6-9

3 ± 8

3 ± 8

7±7

6 ± 8

9-12

16 ± 10

19 ±6

15 ± 4

15 ± 9

12-16

27 + 7

26 ± 12

22 ± 8

22 ± 11

16-20

59 ± 11

61 ± 17

62 ± 13

60 ± 15

0-20

131 ± 19

133 ±25

132 ± 19

132 ±25

0-20 adjustedb

61 + 13

62 ± 14

62+13

66 ± 13

Mean food consumption (g/dam/day)

0-6

21.5 + 2

21.5 ±2

22.3 ±2

22.0 ± 4

6-9

17.8 ± 4

15.2 ±3*

17.9 ± 3

19.9 ± 8

9-12

17.9 ± 2

17.9 ± 2

19.9 ±3*

21.2 ±8

12-16

19.8 ± 2

21.1 ±5

20.4 ± 3

20.2 ±4

16-20

27.3 ± 2

27.4 ±3

26.2 ±6

28.0 ±2

0-20

21.3+1

21.2 ± 2

21.7 ± 2

22.5 ± 3

Mean maternal liver weight(20 days of gestation)

Absolute (g)

15.4 + 2.9

15.3 ±2.9

16.1 ±2.6

16.5 ±2.5

Relative (%)

4.4 ± 0.4

4.4 ± 0.3

4.5 ±0.3

4.6 ± 0.2*

aMean ± SD.

bDam body weight minus the uterus and its contents.

* Significantly different from controls; ANOVA, Welch Test, P < 0.05            

          

TABLE 2

Summary of Observations at Time of Cesarean Sections

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

0

100

300

1000

Animals examined at cesarean sections

25

25

25

25

Nongravid

7

7

5

4

Gravid

18

18

20

21

Dams with resorptions only

0

0

0

0

Dams with viable fetuses

18

18

20

21

Viable fetuses/dama

13.3 ±2.7

13.3 ± 3.3

13.2 ± 4.2

12.4 ± 4.0

Postimplantation loss/dama

1.1 ±0.8

0.6 ± 0.61

1 5 ± 2.31

0.8 + 0.8

Total implantation/dama

14.4 ±2.5

13.9 ± 3.5

14.7 ± 3.4

13.2 ± 4.4

Corpora lutea/dama

17.8 ±3.3

15.8 ± 2.6

17.7 ± 2.9

16.2 ± 3.2

Mean crown-rump length (cm)

3.5 ±0.1

3.5 ± 0.2

3.5 ± 0 1

3.5 ± 0 1

Group mean uterine weights (g)

70.1 ±14.1

71.3 ±17.7

70.3 ±21.2

66.5 ± 18.2

Group mean preimplantation loss (%)

18.8

12.0

17.2

18.2

Group mean postimplantation loss (%)

7.7

4.4

9.9

6.1

Mean fetal body weight (g)

3.4 ±0.2

3.5 ± 0.5

3.4 ± 0.2

3.4 + 0.3

Fetal sex ratio—m:f (%)

44:56

49:51

50:50

55:45*

aMean ± SD.

* Significantly different; x2. P * 0.05.

TABLE 3

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Malformations*

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

No. examined

Litters

18

18

20

21

Fetuses externally

240

238

263

260

Fetuses viscerally

119

118

132

129

Fetuses skeletally

121

121

132

132

 

No.of fetuses (No. Of litters) affected

Malformations observed

 

 

 

 

Anophthalmia

1 (1)

 

 

 

Microphthalmia

 

 

 

2(2)

Gastroschisis

 

 

1(1)

 

Omphalocele

 

 

 

2(2)

Tail agenesis

 

 

1(1)

 

Tarsal flexure

 

 

1(1)

 

Edema

 

 

1(1)

 

Malformed skull bones

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent clavicle

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent scapula

 

 

1(1)

 

Amelia

 

 

1(1)

 

Micromelia

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent limb bones

1(1)

 

 

1(1)

Vertebral agenesis

 

 

1(1)

 

Pelvic malformation

 

 

1(1)

 

Total fetuses (litters) with malformations

2(2)

0(0)

1(1)

5(4)

* No statistical significance was observed.

TABLE 4

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Variations*

 

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Variations*

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

0

100

300

1000

 

No. examined

Litters

18

18

20

21

Fetuses externally

240

238

263

260

Fetuses viscerally

119

118

132

129

Fetuses skeletally

121

121

132

132

 

No.of fetuses (No. Of litters) affected

Developmental variations observed

 

 

 

 

Renal papillae not developed

 

1(1)

1(1)

 

Distended ureter

 

1(1)

1(1)

 

Skull reduced in ossification

2(1)

3(2)

2(2)

 

Hyoid unossified

1(1)

 

1(1)

1(1)

25 presacral vertebrae

 

 

1(1)

2(2)

Greater than 13 pairs of full ribs

 

 

2(2)

 

14th rudimentary rib(s)

6(3)

7(4)

12(5)

6(5)

Bent ribs

 

1(1)

 

2(1)

7th cervical rib

3(3)

 

2(2)

 

Vertebrae reduced in ossification

1(1)

 

1(1)

 

Misaligned sternebra(e)

8(6)

6(5)

8(6)

4(3)

Sternebra 5 and/or 6 unossified

3(5)

7(6)

4(4)

8(6)

Other sternebra(e) unossified

1(1)

 

1(1)

1(1)

Ischia reduced in ossification

1(1)

 

 

2(1)

Total fetuses (litters) with developmental variations

22(12)

24(11)

30(14)

22(12)

* No statistical significance was observed.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawleyd female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.
Executive summary:

In a developmental toxicity reproductive toxicity was evaluated in Sprague-Dawley female rats by using Quat-Silsesquioxane in the concentration of 0, 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day orally by gavage in corn oil.No maternal mortality and clinical signs or behavioral changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. No effect on body weight and feed consumption changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. Similarly, no effect number of corpora lutea, number of live fetuses per litter, litter size, mean fetal body weight, or mean crown-rump length was observed in treated rats. Ratio of male and female pups at the 1000 mg/ kg/day dose level was significantly different from the control group but was not considered treatment related. Slight but significant increase in relative liver weight of treated female rats was observed as compared to control. In addition, No developmental parameter such as viability, fetal body weight and external malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. One fetus with bent limb bones, two fetuses from different mothers with microphthalmia and two other fetuses with omphalocele were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day and single fetus with multiple malformations were observed at 300 mg/kg/day in treated fetuses as compared to control. The incidence of developmental variations in the treated litters was not significantly increased over the control incidence. They occurred in low frequency and were distributed randomly across the Quat-Silsesquioxane treated and control groups. Therefore,NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.