Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 245-048-5 | CAS number: 22509-74-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20 May 2016 - 19 September 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2004
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.2 (Acute Toxicity for Daphnia)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Guidance document on aquatic toxicity testing of difficult items and mixtures, OECD series on testing and assessment number 23.
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ethyl 1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-isoindole-2-carboxylate
- EC Number:
- 245-048-5
- EC Name:
- Ethyl 1,3-dihydro-1,3-dioxo-2H-isoindole-2-carboxylate
- Cas Number:
- 22509-74-6
- Molecular formula:
- C11H9NO4
- IUPAC Name:
- ethyl 1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindole-2-carboxylate
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- - Appearance: white solid
- Storage conditions of test material: in refrigerator (2-8°C)
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Solubility in water: 0.432 g/L at 20°C by the flask method, determined at stirring times of 1 and 2 hours due to degradation of test item in water (determined at previous study)
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Samples were taken from all test concentrations and the control according to the schedule below.
Frequency: 1st test: at t=0 and t=48
2nd test: at the start and end of both 24h renewal intervals.
Volume: 2.4 mL from the approximate centre of the test vessels
Storage: samples were stored in a freezer until analysis.
At the end of the exposure period (1st test) or at the end of the renewal periods (2nd test), the replicates were pooled at each concentration before sampling.
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION:
- Method: Two combined limit/range-finding tests were performed. Preparation of test solutions for both tests started with a loading rate of 100 mg/L. In the 1st test, a one-day period of magnetic stirring was applied to ensure maximum dissolution of the test item in test medium. Stirring time in the 2nd test was reduced to 2 hours to assess whether there was a difference in effects as information became available after the 1st test that the test item degrades very quickly in water. The resulting dispersions were consequently filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter (Whatman; RC55) to remove any non-dissolved material. The obtained Saturated Solutions (SS) were used as the highest test concentrations. Lower test concentrations were prepared by subsequent dilutions of the SS in test medium. All final test solutions were clear and colourless.
- Controls: test medium without test item or other additives (blank-control)
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
- Strain: Straus, 1820
- Source: in-house laboratory culture with a known history. At least third generation, obtained by acyclical parthenogenesis under specified breeding conditions. Daphnids originated from a healthy stock, 2nd to 5th brood, showing no signs of stress such as mortality >20%, presence of males, ephippia or discoloured animals and there was no delay in the production of the first brood.
- Age at study initiation: < 24 hours, from parental daphnids of more than two weeks old.
- Feeding during test: no
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: no
BREEDING:
- Method: each batch was started with newborn daphnids, i.e. less than 3 days old, by placing about 250 of them into 5 litres of medium in an all-glass culture vessel. After 7 days of cultivation half of the medium was renewed twice a week.
- Medium other than test medium: yes, M7
- Feeding: daily, a suspension of fresh water algae.
Study design
- Test type:
- other: 1st test: static, 2nd test: semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
Test conditions
- Test temperature:
- 1st test: 20°C
2nd test: 19 - 21°C - pH:
- 1st test: 6.7 - 8.1 throughout the test
2nd test: 6.6 - 8.1 throughout the test - Dissolved oxygen:
- 1st test: 8.7 - 9.4 mg O2/L throughout the test
2nd test: 8.8 - 9.2 mg O2/L throughout the test - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Two combined limit/range-finding tests were performed.
Nominal test concentrations: 1.0, 10 and 100 % of a SS prepared at 100 mg/L
Measured concentrations first test: at a loading rate of 100 mg/L at t=0: 0.028 mg/L (calculated by extrapolation of calibration curve). Other concentrations were below detection limit of 0.019 mg/L. The average exposure concentration was calculated to be 0.016 mg/L.
Measured concentrations second test: at a loading rate of 100 mg/L at t=0: 2.37 mg/L and at t=24 (fresh solution): 2.59 mg/L. Other concentrations were below detection limit of 0.023 mg/L. The average exposure concentration was calculated to be 0.17 mg/L. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 100 ml, all-glass, open, fill volume: 80 mL
- Aeration: no
- Renewal rate of test solution in the second test: 24 hours
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Standard medium used: yes, adjusted ISO medium
- Source/preparation of dilution water: RO-water
- Culture medium different from test medium: yes, M7
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16 hours, daily
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: mobility at 24 and 48 hours.
- Additional measurements: pH and dissolved oxygen in the 1st test at the beginning and at the end of the test, for the highest concentration and the control. In the 2nd test all fesh and old solutions from at least the control and the highest concentration. Temperature of the medium: continuously in a temperature control vessel beginning at the start of the test. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate (July 2016)
Results and discussion
Effect concentrations
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 0.17 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (dissolved fraction)
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on the average measured exposure concentration of the 2nd test.
- Details on results:
- - Effect parameters were based on the average measured exposure concentration of the 2nd test and the loading rate initially introduced. This was calculated as the average of the geometric mean of the concentrations of test substance measured in the samples taken at t=0, at t=24 in the old and in the fresh medium and at t=48. In case concentrations measured were below the limit of detection, the final exposure concentrations were taken as a factor of 2 below the applicable limit.
- No biological, behavioural or other abnormalities were observed.
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: yes
Individual pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen values remained within acceptable limits throughout the duration of the study. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- 24h-EC50: 0.55 mg/L, 95%CI: 0.50-0.62 mg/L
- 48h-EC50: 0.39 mg/L, 95%CI: 0.33-0.44 mg/L
- Other: results fell within the historical range.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Concentrations of the test item in test medium – combined limit/range-finding test 1
Time of sampling1 [hours] |
Percentage of SS2 [%] |
Analysed concentration [mg/L] |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
n.d. |
|
100 |
0.0283 |
|
|
|
48 |
0 |
n.d. |
|
100 |
n.d. |
|
|
|
1Samples were stored in the freezer (= -15°C) until the day of analysis.
2Saturated solution prepared at a loading rate of 100 mg/L.
3Estimated value, calculated by extrapolation of the calibration curve.
n.d.Not detected. The limit of detection of the method was determined to be 0.019 mg/L taking a dilution factor of 1.67 into account.
n.a.Not applicable.
Table 2 Concentrations of the test item in test medium – combined limit/range-finding test 2
Time of sampling1 [hours] |
Percentage of SS2 [%] |
Analysed concentration [mg/L] |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
n.d. |
(fresh) |
100 |
2.37 |
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
n.d. |
(old) |
100 |
n.d. |
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
n.d. |
(fresh) |
100 |
2.59 |
|
|
|
2 |
0 |
n.d. |
(old) |
100 |
n.d. |
|
|
|
1Samples were stored in the freezer (= -15°C) until the day of analysis.
2Saturated solution prepared at a loading rate of 100 mg/L.
n.d.Not detected. The limit of detection of the method was determined to be 0.023 mg/L taking a dilution factor of 1.67 into account.
n.a.Not applicable.
Table 3 Number of introduced daphnids and incidence of immobility(1sttest)
Time (h) |
Replicate |
Carbaethoxyphthalimid % SS prep. at 100 mg/L |
|||
Control |
1.0 |
10 |
100 (0.016 mg/L) |
||
0 |
A |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
B |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
C |
5 |
5 |
|||
D |
5 |
5 |
|||
Total introduced |
20 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
|
24 |
A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
C |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
D |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
Total immobilised |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Effect % |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
48 |
A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
C |
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
D |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
Total immobilised |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
Effect % |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
Table3
Number of introduced daphnids and incidence of immobility (2ndtest)
Time (h) |
Replicate |
Carbaethoxyphthalimid % SS prep. at 100 mg/L |
|||
Control |
1.0 |
10 |
100 (0.17 mg/L) |
||
0 |
A |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
B |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
C |
5 |
5 |
|||
D |
5 |
5 |
|||
Total introduced |
20 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
|
24 |
A |
0 |
0 |
0 (2) |
0 |
B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
C |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
D |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
Total immobilised |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Effect % |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
48 |
A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
C |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
D |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
Total immobilised |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Effect % |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1). In the controls, no daphnids became immobilised or showed other signs of disease or stress. 2). The oxygen concentration at the end of both tests was = 3 mg/L in control and test vessels.
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the present study, the 48h-EC50 was beyond the range tested, i.e. exceeded an average measured concentration of 0.17 mg/L. This concentrationwas the maximum soluble concentration in a filtrate prepared at a loading rate of 100 mg/L over the test period. Due to the very low solubility of test substance in test medium, concentration levels inducing 50% or more effect on mobility of Daphnia magna could not be reached. It was concluded that the test substance did not affect mobility of Daphnia magna up to the maximum soluble concentration in test medium.
- Executive summary:
This study was performed to assess the effect of the test substance on the mobility of Daphnia magna after 48 hours. The study was conducted in accordance with OECD Guidline for Testing of Chemicals No. 202 and performed under GLP.
Two combined limit/range-finding tests were performed. In the first test, the test solution was stirred for one day to ensure maximum dissolution of the test item in test medium. After the first test, information became available that the test item degrades very quickly in water. Therefore, the test solution was stirred for 2 hours in a second test to assess whether there was a difference in effects.
Loading rates of 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L were used for both tests. Twenty daphnids per group (5 per replicate, quadruplicate) were exposed to an untreated control andthe limit concentration, i.e. the undiluted SS in both tests. In addition, ten daphnids per group (5 per replicate, duplicate) were exposed to1.0 and 10% SS in the combined range-finding test. The total exposure period was 48 hours. The 1st test was performed without renewal of test solutions (static), while test solutions were renewed after 24 hours in the 2nd test (semi-static). Samples for analytical confirmation of exposure concentrations were taken at the start and at the end of the 1st test. In the 2nd test, samples were taken from the freshly prepared and from the 24-hour old solutions. The incidence of immobilisation was recorded for each test at 24 hours and at 48 hours. Analysis of the sample taken from the SS at the start of the 1st test showed a measured concentration of 0.028 mg/L. During the exposure period the measured concentration decreased below the Limit Of Detection (LOD), i.e. below 0.019 mg/L. The average exposure concentration was calculated to be 0.016 mg/L.
Analysis of the samples taken from the freshly prepared SS at the start and after 24 hours during the 2nd test showed measured concentrations of 2.37 and 2.59 mg/L, respectively. These concentrations were 100 times higher than those measured in the 1st test and expected to represent the maximum soluble concentration in test medium after 2 hours of stirring. The measured concentrations decreased below the LOD, i.e. below 0.023 mg/L, during both 24-hour renewal periods. The average exposure concentration was calculated to be 0.17 mg/L.
The final results were based on the average exposure concentration determined in the 2nd test. EC50 for mobility of Daphnia magna after 48 hours of exposure to the test substance exceeded the average measured concentration of 0.17 mg/L, being the maximum soluble concentration in a filtrate prepared at a loading rate of 100 mg/L over the test period.
Due to the very low solubility of Carbaethoxyphthalimid in test medium, concentration levels inducing 50% or more effect on mobility of Daphnia magna could not be reached. It was concluded that Carbaethoxyphthalimid did not affect mobility of Daphnia magna up to the maximum soluble concentration in test medium.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.