Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
study conducted between 26th February 2014 and 12th March 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
Identification: FAT 20341/A TE
Physical State/Appearance: black powder, solid at 20 °C
Batch: BOP 02-12 (Navy PLK 241, BS)
Purity: 80.1%
Expiry date: 21 November 2017
Storage Conditions: room temperature in the dark

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Five male and five female Wistar (RccHan:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non pregnant. After an acclimatization period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals weighed at least 200 g, and were eight to twelve weeks of age. The weight variation did not exceed ±20% of the mean weight for each sex.

The animals were housed in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. The animals were housed individually during the 24 Hour exposure period and in groups of five, by sex, for the remainder of the study. Free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analyzed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25 C and 30 to 70% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.

The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Justification for choice of species:
Rats are the preferred species of choice as historically used for safety evaluation studies and are specified in the appropriate test guidelines.

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: moistened with distilled water
Details on dermal exposure:
Procedure:
On the day before treatment the back and flanks of each animal were clipped free of hair.

Using available information on the toxicity of the test item, a group of five male and five female rats was treated with the test item at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg.

The appropriate amount of test item, moistened with distilled water, was applied as evenly as possible to an area of shorn skin (approximately 10% of the total body surface area). A piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and semi occluded with a piece of self adhesive bandage. The animals were caged individually for the 24 Hour exposure period. Shortly after dosing the dressings were examined to ensure that they were securely in place.

After the 24 Hour contact period the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened with a suitable solvent to remove any residual test item. The animals were returned to group housing for the remainder of the study period.

Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
2000 mg /kg body weight
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 males and 5 females were dosed at 2000 mg/kg bw
Control animals:
not required
Details on study design:
After the 24 Hour contact period the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened with a suitable solvent to remove any residual test item. The animals were returned to group housing for the remainder of the study period.

The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days.

After removal of the dressings and subsequently once daily for fourteen days, the test sites were examined for evidence of primary irritation and
scored according to the following scale from Draize J H (1977) "Dermal and Eye Toxicity Tests" In: Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the
Toxicity of Household Substances, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC p.31:

EVALUATION OF SKIN REACTIONS

Erythema and Eschar Formation Value

No erythema 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) 1
Well-defined erythema 2
Moderate to severe erythema 3
Severe erythema (beef redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth) 4

Oedema Formation

No oedema 0
Very slight oedema (barely perceptible) 1
Slight oedema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising) 2
Moderate oedema (raised approximately 1 millimetre) 3
Severe oedema (raised more than 1 millimetre and extending beyond the area of exposure) 4

Any other skin reactions, if present were also recorded.

Individual body weights were recorded prior to application of the test item on Day 0 and on Days 7 and 14.

At the end of the study the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.


Statistics:
No statistical analysis was performed.

Results and discussion

Preliminary study:
Not applicable
Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits not reported.
Mortality:
No deaths occurred during the study.


Clinical signs:
other: There were no signs of systemic toxicity.
Gross pathology:
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy. Necropsy readings can be found in table 1 for more males and in table 2 for females. Please note the tables can be found in the any other information on results section.
Other findings:
Dermal Irritation. A hardened light brown colored scab was noted at the test site of one female. There were no signs of dermal irritation noted at the test sites of the remaining animals.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1     Individual Dermal Reactions - Males

Dose Level mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Observation

Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Days)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

2000

1-0

Male

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

1-1

Male

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1-2

Male

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1-3

Male

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1-4

Male

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


0=         No reactions

STA=      Blue colored staining

Table 2     Individual Dermal Reactions - Females

Dose Level mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Observation

Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Days)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

2000

2-0

Female

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-1

Female

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-2

Female

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-3

Female

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STASp

STASp

STASp

STASp

STASp

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

2-4

Female

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Other

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

STA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


0=         No reactions

STA=      Blue colored staining

Sp=        Hardened light brown coloured scab

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight.

The test item does not meet the criteria for classification according to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.


Executive summary:

Introduction:

The study was performed to assess the acute dermal toxicity of the test item in the Wistar strain rat.

 

Methods:

A group of ten animals (five males and five females) was given a single, 24 hour, semi‑occluded dermal application of the test item to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight. Clinical signs and body weight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.

  

Results:

Mortality. There were no deaths.

Clinical Observations. There were no signs of systemic toxicity.

Dermal Irritation. A hardened light brown colored scab was noted at the test site of one female. There were no signs of dermal irritation noted at the test sites of the remaining animals.

Body Weight. Animals showed expected gains in body weight, except for two males which showed expected gain in body weight during the first week but body weight loss during the second week.

Necropsy. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

 

Conclusion:

The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight.

 

The test item does not meet the criteria for classification according to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.