Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-539-3 | CAS number: 62-53-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Sediment toxicity
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Lumbriculus variegatus: EC10 = 15.3 mg/kg d.w. (survival, measured concentration)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Two prolonged sediment toxicity test using spiked sediment have been carried out with the midge Chironomus riparius (Egeler et al., 2002) and the worm Lumbriculus riparius (Egeler and Nesa 2002). The test protocol was based on the OECD draft test Guideline 218 with some deviations. The sediment used in the test was an artificial sediment consisting of 5% peat, 20% kaolinite clay and 75% quartz sand. The sediment had a mean organic matter content of 2 ± 0.5%. As food source for the test organisms urtica powder in a concentration of 0.5% of sediment dry weight was added. The test substance was added to the sediment as an aqueous solution. The test system was allowed to equilibrate for 48 hours before the animals larvae were introduced.
Mean recovery rates of test substance concentrations were 30 and 37.2 % for the Chironomus test and Lumbriculus test, respectively. Nominal concentrations were corrected accordingly.
The following endpoints were determined:
Chironomus riparius: NOEC = 37.5 mg/kg d.w. (emergence, measured concentration)
Chironomus riparius: NOEC = 75 mg/kg d.w. (development rate, measured concentration)
Lumbriculus variegatus: NOEC < 11.6 mg/kg d.w. (reproduction and growth, measured concentration)*
Lumbriculus variegatus: EC10 = 15.3 mg/kg d.w. (survival, measured concentration)*
*The results of the study with Lumbriculus variegatus show a clear dose-response relationship for the endpoint survival. However, for the endpoints biomass and reproduction there were clear effects from the lowest concentration level on. Therefore, no dose-response relationship could be calculated for these endpoints.
Derivation of PNECsediment
From both tests it can be concluded that Lumbriculus is more sensitive to aniline in sediment than Chironomus. Although no NOEC could be determined for the sublethal endpoints, the EC10 determined for the endpoint survival (15.3 mg/kg dw) is about a factor of 2 lower than the EC10 from the Chironomus study for the endpoint emergence.
Therefore the EC10 for survival of Lumbriculus was used as basic value for the derivation of PNECsediment. In consideration, that the sublethal endpoints reproduction and growth are more sensitive, an assessment factor of 100 could be applied to the EC10 of 15.3 mg/kg dw resulting in a PNECsediment of 153 μg/kg dw.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.