Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-126-4 | CAS number: 10544-72-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
For a monomer of dinitrogen tetraoxide, nitrogen dioxide, a number of studies reported positive in vitro results in the mutagenicity studies in bacteria and clastogenicity in mammalian cells. Based on this dinitrogen tetraoxide is considered to be genotoxic in vitro.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
A monomer of dinitrogen tetraoxide, nitrogen dioxide, was shown to induce both mutagenic and clastogenic effects in several organs following in vivo exposure. Based on this dinitrogen tetraoxide is considered to be genotoxic in vivo.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Mode of Action Analysis / Human Relevance Framework
Dinitrogen tetraoxide exists in equilibrium with its monomer nitrogen dioxide (NO2), with ca. 25% present in the form of NO2 at 25 °C. At greater dilution, e.g. with air, the amount of NO2 is larger. Nitrogen dioxide is an uncharged stable radical and an oxidizing agent. As a free radical, nitrogen dioxide is capable of reacting with biomolecules via different pathways, e.g. abstraction of hydrogen with the formation of nitrous acid and a molecule radical, addition of organic molecules to double bonds, or electron transfer of organic molecules to NO2 with the formation of a nitrite ion, the biomolecule radical and a proton (MAK, 2005). As a result, NO2 can produce reactive oxygen species and cause peroxidation of lipid membranes and cell damage. It is most likely that these types of reaction enable its ability to interact with DNA and cause genetic damage in vitro and in vivo. Since this type of reactions is in general non-specific, the observed effects in experimental animals have to be regarded as possibly relevant for humans.
Additional information
Dinitrogen tetraoxide exists in equilibrium with nitrogen dioxide, with ca. 25% present in the form of NO2 at 25 °C. At greater dilution, e. g. with air, the amount of NO2 is greater. Therefore it would seem inevitable that any toxicity studies conducted with either NO2 or N2O4 will share common mechanism. Therefore read-across from NO2 to N2O4 is considered to be justified.
For NO2 a number of studies reported positive in vitro results in the mutagenicity studies in bacteria and clastogenicity in mammalian cells.Gene mutations were reported in different strains of E. coli and S. typhimurium (Victorin et al., 1998; Kosaka et. al, 1986; Arroyo et al., 1992; MAK (2005) and references quoted therein). Furthermore, increased sister chromatid exchange at a concentration of 5 ppm and chromosomal aberrations at a concentration of 10 ppm in V79 cells after 10 minutes exposure have been reported (Thuda et al, 1981). The induction of DNA strand breaks was also detected in V79 cells after exposure to NO2concentrations of ≥ 10 ppm for 20 minutes (Görsdorf et al., 1990).
In vivo, no induction of chromosome aberrations was observed in leukocytes and spermatocytes of mice exposed to NO2 for 6 hours at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 5 and 10 ppm (Gooch et al., 1977). No increase in the number of micronuclei was seen in the bone marrow of mice exposed to NO2 concentrations of 20 ppm for 23 hours (Victorin et al., 1990). NO2 also did not induce DNA strand breaks in alveolar macrophages of rats exposed to 1.2 mL/m3 for 3 days (Bermudez et al., 1999).
Dose-dependent increases in mutations and in chromosome aberrations were reported in lung cells from rats exposed to NO2 for 3 hours at 8, 15, 21 and 28 ppm (15, 29, 40 and 53 mg/m3) (Isomura et al, 1984). However, this study has several deficiencies, e.g. the survival of the lung cells was very low (10-15%), the conditions of the test were not validated, and the frequency of chromosomal aberrations was determined at a late time point. The animals were not killed until 18 hours after the exposure and the primary lung cells were cultivated for 5 days before they were seeded for the chromosomal aberration test. The preparation and evaluation of the metaphases was carried out three days later. However, this study gives an indication of a possible local genotoxicity of nitrogen dioxide at the port of entry.
Han and co-workers (2013) performed a Comet assay, a micronucleus assay and a DNA-protein complex assay in male rats (6/group) exposed to NO2 for 6 hours/day for 7 days at analytical concentrations levels of 0, 5, 10 and 20 mg/m3. The testing protocol for the Comet assay had some deviations from the OECD guideline 489. In particular, olive tail moment was used to evaluate DNA damage while % tail DNA is the parameter recommended in the OECD guideline 489. In the Comet assay, single cells suspensions were prepared from brain, lungs, liver, kidneys and spleen following the sacrifice, and 300 cells per group (50/animal, vs. 150/animal recommended by OECD guideline 489) were examined. No information on positive control was provided in the publication. Dose-dependent increases in Olive tail moments (OTM) were observed in cells from all examined organs, except kidneys, where no clear dose-response trend was observed. The observed increases reached statistical significance at all tested dose levels in the lung, liver and kidneys while for brain and spleen cells, statistical significance was reached at two top tested concentrations. In the micronucleus assay, 2000 polychromated erythrocytes from bone marrow were examined from each rat. The frequencies of micronucleated polychromated erythrocytes increased significanty withincreasing concentration of NO2(1.74, 2.13 and 2.71-fold of control, P < 0.001). The results indicate that NO2induced the micronuclei formation in a dose dependent manner. Finally, in the DNA-protein complex assay, the DPC coefficients were statistically significantly increased in single cell suspensions from all examined organs (brain, lungs, liver, heart, kidneys, spleen), with statistical significance reached at all dose levels in the liver, at two top dose levels in brain, spleen and heart and at the highest dose level in lungs and kidneys. Based on this results, NO2 is concluded to induce the formation of DNA-protein complexes under the conditions of the study.
The study of Han et al. (2013) is published in a peer-reviewed journal, sufficient experimental details are provided, and basic scientific principles are met. Because the study shows a clear dose-related increase in the DNA damage in all five tissues analysed, the above mentioned deviations do not affect the scientific acceptability and the study results are considered valid.
Genetic toxicity of the monomer of dinitrogen tetraoxide (N2O4), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), has also been discussed in detail in the reports of MAK (2005) and the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL, 2014). The MAK (2005) concluded that in vitro nitrogen dioxide produced clear mutagenic and clastogenic effects, while the study of Isomura et al., 1984, which was considered to be of limited validity, provided some evidence of local genotoxic effects. The SCOEL (2014) evaluation concluded that available studies did not provide evidence of systemic genotoxic effects of nitrogen dioxide, but that further studies may be required to evaluate a possible local genotixicity on epithelia of the airways. It should be noted, however, that neither of these evaluations has taken the study of Han et al. (2013) into consideration.
Based on the results of the study of Han and co-workers (2013), the monomer of dinitrogen tetraoxide, nitrogen dioxide, is capable of inducing both mutagenic and clastogenic effectsin vivoin muptiple organs and tissues. As dinitrogen tetraoxide exists in equilibrium with nitrogen dioxide, it is feasible to assume that also dinitrogen tetraoxide is capable of inducing genetic damagein vivo. As dinitrogen tetraoxide is a gas, it is expected to be easily distributed through the body and is therefore capable of reaching gonads. Therefore its ability to cause heritable genotoxic effects cannot be excluded based on the available data.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Regulation 1272/2008/EC, the classification of individual substances shall be based on the total weight of evidence available, using expert judgement. The monomer of dinitrogen tetraoxide, nitrogen dioxide, was found to cause both mutagenic and clastogenic effects in vivo in different organs and tissues, including brain, heart, lungs, liver and kidneys. As dinitrogen tetraoxide exists in equilibrium with nitrogen dioxide, it is feasible to assume that also dinitrogen tetraoxide is capable of inducing genetic damage in vivo. As dinitrogen tetraoxide is a gas, it is expected to be easily distributed through the body and is therefore capable of reaching gonads. Thus the substance needs to be considered as having a potential of inducing mutations in germ cells in vivo. Based on this, classification of dinitrogen tetraoxide as Mutagenic Cat. 1B, H340 (May cause genetic defects by inhalation) is proposed in accordance with Regulation 1272/2008/EC.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.