Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 230-392-0 | CAS number: 7087-68-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
There is a GLP study performed according to OECD 406 which demonstrate that EDIPA is not a skin sensitizer.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- end: 2003-12-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, OECD N°406 Guideline (1992 July 17th)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See other informations
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- the GPMT study was performed before implematation of the LLNA test
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hartley Crl: (HA) BR, caesarian obtanied, Barrier sustained - Virus Antibody Free (COBS - VAF) Charles River Laboratories France, L'arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: 1-2 month old
- Weight at study initiation: 370+/-16g (males) 360+/-17g (females)
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum 106 pelleted diet (SAFE, Villemoisson, Epinay-sur-Orge, France)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum water filtered by a FG Millipore 0.22µ
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before the beginning of the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2°C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: - Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- other: intradermal induction: corn oil. Cutaneous induction: 80/20 ethanol and purifies water. Cutaneous challenge: acetone
- Concentration / amount:
- 1st induction (intradermal): 1%
2nd induction (cutaneous): 100%
Challenge(cutaneous): 5% - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: intradermal induction: corn oil. Cutaneous induction: 80/20 ethanol and purifies water. Cutaneous challenge: acetone
- Concentration / amount:
- 1st induction (intradermal): 1%
2nd induction (cutaneous): 100%
Challenge(cutaneous): 5% - No. of animals per dose:
- control group: 5 males and 5 females
treated group: 10 males and 10 females. - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Intradermal route: Concentrations of 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 5%, 10%, and 25% were tested
Cutaneous route: concentrations of 10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% were tested
Challenge phase: Concentrations of 1%, 5%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 100% were tested
MAIN STUDY
INDUCTION PHASE
On day 1, three pairs of intradermal injections were performed in the interscapular region of all animals:
* Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) diluted to 50% (v/v) with 0.9% NaCl (both groups),
* test item at the concentration of 1% (w/w) in corn oil (treated group) or vehicle alone (control group),
* test item at the concentration of 1% (w/w) in a mixture FCA/0.9% NaCl (50/50, w/w) (treated group) or vehicle at the concentration of 50% (v/w) in a mixture FCA/0.9% NaCl (50/50, v/v) (control group).
CHALLENGE PHASE
On day 7, a topical application of sodium lauryl sulfate at 10% (w/w) in vaseline was performed to the same area of the animals of both groups, in order to induce a local irritation.
On day 8, the animals of the treated group received a topical application of the undiluted test item to the same test site, which was then covered by an occlusive dressing for 48 hours. The animals of the control group received an application of ethanol/water (80/20, w/w) under the same experimental conditions.
On day 22, all animals of both groups were challenged by a cutaneous application of the test item at the concentration of 5% (w/w) in acetone to the right flank. The test item was maintained under an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. The vehicle was applied to the left flank under the same experimental conditions.
Mercaptobenzothiazole. 5control and 10 treated guinea pig. Intradermal induction (D1): 1%. Cutaneous induction (D8): 20%. Cutaneous challenge (D22): 20% - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Positive control results:
- Mercaptobenzothiazole at the concentration of 20% induced positive sensitisation reactions in 8/10 guinea pigs.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- According to the maximization method of Magnusson and Kligman, Ethyldiisopropylamine does not induce delayed contact hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.
- Executive summary:
The delayed contact hypersensivity of Ethyldiisopropylamine (EDIPA) was evaluated in Guinea pigs according to OECD N°406 guideline (Magnusson and Kligman test).
The induction phase has been realized both by intradermal route on day 1 (EDIPA 1% in vehicle) and by cutaneous route on day 8 (EDIPA 100%) in 2 groups of guinea pigs: 5 males and 5 females for control group and 10 males and 10 females for treated group. The challenge phase was realized on day 22 by cutaneous application of EDIPA 5%; the cutaneous reactions were scored 24 and 48 hours after the challenge phase.
A discrete erythema (grade 1) was observed in 1/10 animals of the control group at the 24-hour reading. In the treated group, a discrete erythema (grade 1) was noted in 2/19 animals, at the 24-hour reading only.
In conclusion, in these experimental conditions, Ethyldiisopropylamine was not sensitizing in guinea pigs.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
The delayed contact hypersensivity of Ethyldiisopropylamine (EDIPA) was evaluated in Guinea pigs according to OECD N°406 guideline (Magnusson and Kligman test) (KIlein, 2004). The induction phase has been realized both by intradermal route on day 1 (EDIPA 1% in vehicle) and by cutaneous route on day 8 (EDIPA 100%) in 2 groups of guinea pigs: 5 males and 5 females for control group and 10 males and 10 females for treated group. The challenge phase was realized on day 22 by cutaneous application of EDIPA 5%; the cutaneous reactions were scored 24 and 48 hours after the challenge phase.
A discrete erythema (grade 1) was observed in 1/10 animals of the control group at the 24-hour reading. In the treated group, a discrete erythema (grade 1) was noted in 2/19 animals, at the 24-hour reading only.
In conclusion, in these experimental conditions, Ethyldiisopropylamine was not sensitizing in guinea pigs.
Migrated from Short description of key information:
Ethyldiisopropylamine was not sensitizing in guinea pigs.
Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
Key study
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
In a test performed following the GPMT, EDIPA was not a skin sensitizer. On the basis of this study and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.