Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In vivo skin and eye irritation tests are performed with the test substance. Under the conditions of these studies, the test item exhibited neither an eye- nor a skin irritation potential.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
02.1988
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
(adopted 1981)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Occlusive treatment.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
(adopted 2002)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Occlusive treatment. Treatment of 4 animals. No data on purity of test substance.
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Chemical name: Epoxystearinsaeure-2-ethylhexylester
- Physical state: colorless liquid
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Kleinrusse Chbb:HM
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Fa. Thomae, Biberach, Germany
- Age at study initiation: adult
- Sex: male
- Weight at study initiation: 2.31 kg (mean)
- Housing: single housing
- Diet: Diet 20 ZH 5, Fa. Nohrlin GmbH, Bad Salzuflen
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 1 week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-21
- Humidity (%): 45-50
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL
- Concentration: undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
3 days
Number of animals:
4
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used: gauze patch with test substance, covered with a plastic film and fixed with adhesive plaster

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no data

SCORING SYSTEM:
Draize scheme
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.5
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Remarks on result:
other: Calculated from the raw data.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: Calculated from the raw data.

In the original assessment of the study a primary irritation index of 0.5 based on readings after 24, 48, and 72 hours was reported. (PII = Sum of all reactions/(Number of animals*Number of reading time points)

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In conclusion, the test substance showed no skin irritating potential
Executive summary:

In a study according to OECD TG 404 (adopted 1981, GLP), the skin irritating potential of the test substance was observed in 4 male Kleinrusse rabbits. The rabbits were treated with 0.5 mL of the undiluted test substance for 4 hours under occlusive conditions. Readings were performed 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application. An erythema mean score of 0.5 was calculated from the results after 24, 48, and 72 hours. The findings were fully reversible within 72 h. The corresponding edema score was 0. In conclusion, the test substance showed no skin irritating potential

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
4 Mar 1988 - 11 Mar 1988
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
(adopted 1987)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
(adopted 2002)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Use of 4 animals and no data on purity of test substance.
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Chemical name: Epoxystearinsaeure-2-ethylhexylester
- Physical state: colorless liquid
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Kleinrusse Chbb:HM
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Fa. Thomae, Biberach, Germany
- Sex: male
- Age at study initiation: adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2.42 kg (mean)
- Housing: single housing
- Diet: Altromin diet 2023, Altromin GmbH, Lage, Germany, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 1 week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-21
- Humidity (%): 45-55
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.1 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single application without washing
Observation period (in vivo):
72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
4
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM:
Draize scheme

READINGS:
1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE:
fluorescein
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.08
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Conjunctivae findings were observed at 1, 6, and 24 h after treatment. 3/4 animals had a score of 1, 1/4 animals had a score of 2 after 1 hour. After 6 h 2/4 animals had a score of 1, whereas no findings were observed in the other 2 animals. After 24 h a score of 1 was observed in 1/4 animals. No findings were observed in the other 3 animals. No conjunctivae findings were observed at later time points. No iris or corneal findings and chemosis were observed in any animal at any time point. Discharge (score 2) was observed in 4/4 animals 1 hour after treatment but was fully reversible within 6 hours.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test substance showed no eye irritating potential
Executive summary:

In a study according to OECD TG 405 (adopted 1987, GLP), the eye irritating potential of the test substance was observed in 4 male Kleinrusse rabbits. 0.1 mL of the undiluted test substance was instilled into the rabbits eye and no washing was performed. Readings were performed 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application. Conjunctivae findings were observed at 1, 6, and 24 h after treatment, where 3/4 animals had a score of 1 and 1/4 animals had a score of 2 after 1 hour. After 6 h, 2/4 animals had a score of 1, whereas no findings were observed in the other 2 animals. After 24 h a score of 1 was observed in 1/4 animals. No findings were observed in the other 3 animals. No conjunctivae findings were observed at later time points. No iris or corneal findings and chemosis were observed in any animal at any time point. Discharge (score 2) was observed in 4/4 animals 1 hour after treatment but was fully reversible within 6 hours.

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

For the test substance in vivo data on skin and eye irritating properties are available. The concerning studies are summarized below.

Skin irritation in vivo

In a study according to OECD TG 404 (adopted 1981, GLP), the skin irritating potential of the test substance was observed in 4 male Kleinrusse rabbits. The rabbits were treated with 0.5 mL of the undiluted test substance for 4 hours under occlusive conditions. Readings were performed 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application. An erythema mean score of 0.5 was calculated from the results after 24, 48, and 72 hours. The findings were fully reversible within 72 h. The corresponding edema score was 0. In conclusion, the test substance showed no skin irritating potential (Henkel 1988).

Eye irritation in vivo

In a study according to OECD TG 405 (adopted 1987, GLP), the eye irritating potential of the test substance was observed in 4 male Kleinrusse rabbits. 0.1 mL of the undiluted test substance was instilled into the rabbits eye and no washing was performed. Readings were performed 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after application. Conjunctivae findings were observed at 1, 6, and 24 h after treatment, where 3/4 animals had a score of 1 and 1/4 animals had a score of 2 after 1 hour. After 6 h, 2/4 animals had a score of 1, whereas no findings were observed in the other 2 animals. After 24 h a score of 1 was observed in 1/4 animals. No findings were observed in the other 3 animals. No conjunctivae findings were observed at later time points. No iris or corneal findings and chemosis were observed in any animal at any time point. Discharge (score 2) was observed in 4/4 animals 1 hour after treatment but was fully reversible within 6 hours. In conclusion, the test substance showed no eye irritating potential (Henkel 1988).

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. A GLP-compliant OECD 404 study is available for skin irritation. A GLP-compliant OECD 405 study is available for eye irritation. In both studies, the scores for the test item treated tissues were below the thresholds for classification as an irritant. As a result, the substance is not considered to be classified for skin or eye irritation under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008,as amended for the fourteenth time in Regulation (EC) No. 2020/217.