Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1998

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole
EC Number:
227-114-5
EC Name:
Octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole
Cas Number:
5661-03-0
Molecular formula:
C7H13N
IUPAC Name:
octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
10, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate.
Vehicle / solvent:
distilled water
Controls
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
dimethylsulfoxide
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
mitomycin C
other: 2-anthramine
Remarks:
Tested with S9 mix : only 2-anthramine.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
The five strains were supplied by BNAmes' Laboratory, stored in a cryoprotective medium in a liquid nitrogen container.
The day before treatment, cultures were inoculated from frozen permanents : a scrape was taken under sterile conditions and put into approximately 6ml of nutrient broth. The nutrient broth was the placed under agitation in an incubator at 37°C for about 14 hours, to produce bacterial suspensions. Each strain derived from Salmonella Typhimurium LT2 contains one mutation in the histidine operon, resulting in a requirement for histidine.

In addition, to increase their sensitivity to mutagenic substances, further mutations have been added (see table below)

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test substance does not show mutagenic activity in the bacterial reverse mutation test on Salmonella Typhimurium.
Executive summary:

The test substance was freely soluble in the vehicle, at 50 mg/ml.

Consequently, with a maximum dose volume of 100 µl/plate, the dose-levels for the preliminary toxicity test were : 10, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate.

The evaluation of toxicity was performed on the basis of the observation of the decrease in the number of revertant colonies and/or a thinning of the bacterial lawn.

Since the test substance was sometimes toxic, the choice of the highest dose-level was based on the level of toxicity, according to the criteria specified in the international guidelines.

In the absence of S9 mix, no increase in the number of revertant colonies, in comparison to the vehicle control values, was noted in both mutagenicity experiments.

Since equivocal results were observed in the two first experiments with S9mix (for 1535 strain, at high dose levels- 2500 and 5000), a third experiment was performed with modified conditions (i.e preincubation method) => no increase in the number of colonies was noted in the TA 1535 strain. Therefore, it was concluded that the observed increased in the first experiment was not biologically relevant.

The number of revertants in the vehicle and positive controls was as specified in the acceptance criteria => the study was therefore considered valid.