Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Slightly irritant

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Remarks:
Test performed in 2010 for purpose of medical device
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
from 27/07/2010 to 03/08/2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ISO 10993-10:2002
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Allevamento Bettinardi - Mamo (NO) - ltaly
- Weight at study initiation: 3210-3610 g at the beginning ofthe test
- Housing: Each rabbit was caged in stainless steel cages of cm 48.2x63x37 h equipped with automatic washing cycle. The housing room was lighted with fiuorescent lamps 12 hours for day. Room temperature and humidity were regulated by a conditioning pian! and were monitored daily. Recordings of the housing conditions are being retained in Eurofins Biolab S.r.l. files.
- Diet: The animals were fed with standard pellet complete diet supplied by the authorised breeder Harlan.
- Water: Filtered tap water from locai network was supplied ad libitum

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature and humidity: Room temperature and humidity
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): The housing room was lighted with fiuorescent lamps 12 hours for day.
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
0,5 ml of the test product were applied with a gauze (25 mmx 25 mm) directly to the skin on cranial site of each rabbit and covered with non-occlusive dressing
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The patches were removed 4 hours alter the application
Observation period:
60min, 24h, 48h, 72h
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6,25cm2
- Type of wrap if used: no irritant gauze

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Time after start of exposure: 4h

OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
- 60min, 24h, 48h, 72h

SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: ISO 10993-10:2002
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal: Cranial (left area) and Caudal (right area): Animal number 317 - Animal number 320 - Animal number 354
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal: Craudal (right area): Animal number 317 - Animal number 320 - Animal number 354
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal: Cranial (left area): Animal number 317 - Animal number 320 - Animal number 354
Time point:
72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal: Caudal (right area): Animal number 317 - Animal number 320 - Animal number 354
Time point:
48 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal: Cranial (left area): Animal number 317 - Animal number 320 - Animal number 354
Time point:
48 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: On the basis of the results, interpreted according to GHS regulation, the test substance is considered SLIGHTLY IRRITANT for skin but, according to CLP regulation 1272/08, the subtance is not classified as skin irritant (score for CLP category 2 is from 2
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal: Caudal (right area): Animal number 320 - Animal number 354
Time point:
24 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal: Caudal (right area): Animal number 317
Time point:
24 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: On the basis of the results, interpreted according to GHS regulation, the test substance is considered SLIGHTLY IRRITANT for skin but, according to CLP regulation 1272/08, the subtance is not classified as skin irritant (score for CLP category 2 is from 2
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal: Cranial (left area): Animal number 317 - Animal number 320 - Animal number 354
Time point:
24 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: On the basis of the results, interpreted according to GHS regulation, the test substance is considered SLIGHTLY IRRITANT for skin but, according to CLP regulation 1272/08, the subtance is not classified as skin irritant (score for CLP category 2 is from 2
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.21
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: On the basis of the results, interpreted according to ISO 10993-10:2002, the test product must be considered SLIGHTLY IRRITANT for the skin, but not irritant according to CLP 1272/08.
Interpretation of results:
Category 3 (mild irritant) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
On the basis of the results, interpreted according to GHS regulation, the test substance is considered SLIGHTLY IRRITANT for skin but, according to CLP regulation 1272/08, the subtance is not classified as skin irritant (score for CLP category 2 is from 2,3 to 4.0)
Executive summary:

On the test substance a toxicological study was carried out to evaluate the possible locai toxic effects, throughout the following test:

 - skin irritation test according to ISO 10993-10:2002

The skinirritation test was carriedout through a semi-occlusive application; the test product was applied on the intact skin of 3 rabbits, in the dorsal region both on the left and on the right side.

Each animal had the right caudal region and left cranial region treated with the test product.

The right cranial region and the left caudal region were treated with a non irritant humidified gauze (25mmx25mm), used as control.

Reactions were evaluated 1 hours following the remaval of the patches and were evaluated againat 24, 48 and 72h after exposure.

-After 60 minutes all treated sites shown a very slight erythema.

-After 24 hours two animals shown a well defined erythema in treated cranial site and a very slight erythema in the caudal sites, one animai shown a well defined erythema in both treated sites.

Symptoms disappear completely in all animals in the caudal sites after 72 hours, in the cranial sites after 7 days.

In control regions no oedema or erythema were observed.

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Study Plan date:01. Feb. 2019
Experimental Starting Date: 11. Feb. 2019
Experimental Completion Date: 08. May 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
human
Strain:
other: EpiOcular(TM) (OCL-200, OCL-212 EIT), Keratinocyte Strain 4F1188
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Specification
Commercially available EpiOcularTM kit.
The EpiOcularTM tissue consists of normal, human-derived keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a stratified squamous epithelium similar to that found in the human cor-nea. It consists of highly organized basal cells. These cells are not transformed or trans-fected with genes to induce an extended life span. The EpiOcularTM tissues are cultured in specially prepared cell culture inserts with a porous membrane through which nutrients can pass to the cells. The tissue surface is 0.6 cm2.

Origin
EpiOcularTM tissues were procured from MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories, Mlynské Nivy 73, 82105 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Main Test:
Designation of the kit: OCL-212-EIT
Day of delivery: 17. Feb. 2019
Batch no.: 27091

Additional Test with freeze killed tissues:
Designation of the kit: OCL-200-EIT
Day of delivery: 23. Jan. 2018
Batch no.: 27020
The tissues were placed in the freezer on the day of delivery and stored in the freezer until use.

Demonstration of Proficiency
The validity of the EpiOcularTM test at LAUS GmbH was demonstrated in a proficiency study. For this purpose 15 proficiency chemicals (indicated by the OECD 492 guideline) were tested. All of the 15 proficiency chemicals were correctly categorized. Therefore, the proficiency of the EpiOcularTM test was demonstrated.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
50 µL of the controls and the test item were applied
Duration of treatment / exposure:
28 minutes
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
12 minutes serum-free DMEM at room temperature (post-soak).
120 minutes at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity (post-treatment)
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2 replicates
Details on study design:
Preparations:
On the day of the start of the experiment, the MTT concentrate was thawed. The MTT concentrate was diluted with assay medium directly before use.
The assay medium was warmed in the water bath to 37 ± 1°C.
6-well-plates were labelled with test item, negative control and positive control and filled with 1 mL assay medium in the appropriate wells.
All inserts were inspected for viability and the presence of air bubbles between agarose gel and insert. Viable tissues were transferred in the prepared 6-well-plate and incubated at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity for 1 hour.
After the pre-incubation, the medium was replaced and the wells were filled with 1 mL fresh assay medium. All 6-well-plates were incubated at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity for 16 hours and 59 minutes.

Exposure and Post-Treatment:
After overnight incubation, the tissues were pre-wetted with 20 µL DPBS buffer and then incubated at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity for 29 minutes. After that, 50 µL of the controls and the test item were applied in duplicate in one- minute- in-tervals. This was done in such a fashion that the upper surface of the tissue was covered. At the beginning of each experiment (application of negative controls), a stop watch was started. After dosing the last tissue, all plates were transferred into the incubator for 28 minutes at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity.
At the end of the exposure time, the inserts were removed from the plates in one- minute-intervals using sterile forceps and rinsed immediately. The inserts were thoroughly rinsed with DPBS. Then, the tissues were immediately transferred to and immersed in 5 mL of pre-warmed assay medium in a pre-labelled 12-well plate for 12 minutes post soak at room temperature.
After that, each insert was removed from the medium, the medium was decanted off the tissue and the insert was blotted on absorbent material and transferred into the respective well of a pre-labelled 6-well plate containing 1 mL assay medium. For post-treatment incu-bation, the tissues were incubated for 120 minutes at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% relative humidity.
After the post-treatment incubation, the MTT assay was performed.

MTT Assay and Extraction:
A 24-well-plate was prepared with 300 µL freshly prepared MTT solution in each well. The tissue inserts were blotted on absorbent material and then transferred into the MTT solu-tion. The plate was incubated for 180 minutes at 37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1 % CO2 and ≥ 95% rela-tive humidity.
At last, each insert was thoroughly dried and set into a pre-labelled 6-well-plate, containing 2 mL isopropanol, taking care that no isopropanol was flowing into the tissue insert. The plate was firmly sealed to avoid evaporation of the solvent and stored in the refrigerator overnight. On the next day the plate was shaken for 2 hours at room temperature, pro-tected from light.


Measurement:
The inserts were removed from the 6-well plate and discarded. The content of each well was thoroughly mixed in order to achieve homogenisation.
From each well, two replicates with 200 µL solution (each) were pipetted into a 96-well-plate. Eight wells with 200 µL isopropanol were pipetted also. The plate was read in a plate spectrophotometer at 570 nm.
Irritation parameter:
other:
Remarks:
Mean viability (%)
Run / experiment:
exposure time: 28 minutes
Value:
66.7
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
Under the conditions of the test, Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX) is considered non-eye irritant in the EpiOcularTM Eye Irritation Test.
After treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 66.8 %. This value is above the threshold for eye irritation potential (≤ 60%).
All validity criteria were met. The criterion for optical density of the negative control was fulfilled: The OD value was 2.1 (> 0.8 and < 2.5).
The positive control induced a decrease in tissue viability as compared to the negative control to 37.1%. Variation within the replicates of the controls and the test item was ac-ceptable (< 20%).
For these reasons, the result of the test is considered valid.

1        Findings and Results


1.1       Measured Values Main Test


As blank, the optical density of isopropanol was measured in eight wells of the 96-well-plate. The measured values and their mean are given in the following table:


Table 9.1‑a      Absorbance Values Blank Isopropanol (OD at 570 nm)






























Replicate



1



2



3



4



5



6



7



8



Mean



Absorbance



0.033



0.033



0.033



0.034



0.033



0.034



0.033



0.034



0.033



The absorbance values of negative control, test item and positive control are given in the following table:


Table 9.1‑b      Absorbance Values Negative Control, Positive Control and Test Item (OD at 570 nm)







































Designation



Measurement



Negative Control



Positive Control



Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX)



Tissue 1 



1



2.095



0.804



1.623



2



2.067



0.787



1.607



Tissue 2 



1



2.090



0.787



1.339



2



2.087



0.796



1.338



From the measured absorbances, the mean of each tissue was calculated, subtracting the mean absorbance of isopropanol as given in table 9.1-a (= corrected values).


Table 9.1‑c      Mean Absorbance Negative Control, Positive Control and Test Item
























Designation



Negative Control



Positive Control



Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX)



Mean – blank (Tissue 1)



2.048



0.763



1.582



Mean – blank (Tissue 2)



2.056



0.859



1.306



1.2       Comparison of Tissue Viability


For the test item and the positive control, the following percentage values of tissue viability were calculated in comparison to the negative control:


Table 9.2‑a      % Viability Positive Control and Test Item


























Designation



Positive Control



Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX)



% Viability (Tissue 1)



37.2%



77.1%



% Viability (Tissue 2)



37.0%



63.6%



% Viability Mean



37.1%



70.4%



1.3       Measured Values of the Additional Test for Direct MTT Reduction


The absorbance values of negative control and test item with freeze-killed tissues are given in the following table:


Table 9.3‑a      Absorbance Values Blank Isopropanol (OD at 570 nm)






























Replicate



1



2



3



4



5



6



7



8



Mean



Absorbance



0.033



0.033



0.033



0.033



0.034



0.033



0.033



0.033



0.033



The absorbance values (freeze-killed tissues) of negative control and test item are given in the following table:


Table 9.3‑b      Absorbance Values (freeze-killed tissues) of Negative Control and Test Item


(OD at 570 nm)


































Designation



Measurement



Negative


Control



Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX)



Tissue 1 



1



0.076



0.152



2



0.074



0.151



Tissue 2 



1



-



0.148



2



-



0.146



From the measured absorbances, the mean of each tissue was calculated, subtracting the mean absorbance of isopropanol as given in table 9.3-a (= corrected values):


Table 9.3‑c      Mean Absorbance (freeze-killed tissues) of Negative Control and Test Item





















Designation



Negative Control



Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX)



Mean – blank
(Tissue 1)



0.042



0.119



Mean – blank
(Tissue 2)



-



0.114



The corrected mean of the negative control (freeze-killed tissue) was subtracted from the corrected mean values of the OD of the test item (freeze-killed tissues):


Table 9.3‑c      Corrected Mean Absorbance of Test Item (freeze-killed tissues)


















Designation



Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX)



Mean – corrected mean of the negative control


(freeze-killed) (Tissue 1)



0.077



Mean – corrected mean of the negative control


(freeze-killed) (Tissue 2)



0.072



 1.4       Comparison of Tissue Viability


For the test item (freeze-killed tissues) the following percentage values of tissue viability were calculated in comparison to the negative control of the main test:


Table 9.4‑a      % Viability of Test Item (freeze-killed tissues)






















Designation



Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX)



% Viability (freeze-killed tissue 1)



3.7%



% Viability (freeze-killed tissue 2)



3.5%



% Mean viability (freeze-killed tissues)



3.6%



1.5       Corrected Tissue Viability of Test Item


The mean value of “% Viability (freeze-killed)” (table 9.4-a) was subtracted from “% Viability” of the main test (table 9.2-a).


Table 9.5‑a      % Corrected Viability of Test Item






















Designation



Reaction Products of olive oil and ozone (NOVOX)



% Mean viability (main test)



70.4%



% Mean viability (freeze-killed tissues)



3.6%



% Corrected mean viability



66.8%



Note: All excel calculations were performed with unrounded values. Therefore, re-calculation with rounded values may lead to slightly different results


1.6       Assessment


Eye hazard potential is assessed using the criteria given in the following table:


Table 9.6‑a      Assessment of Eye Hazard Potential





















% Viability



Assessment



UN GHS classification



> 60 %



Non eye irritant



No Category



60 %



At least eye irritant



No prediction can be made (category 1 or 2)



1.7       Validity


Validity criteria and results are stated in the following table:


Table 9.7‑a      Validity


























Criterion



Demanded



Found (Main Test)



Mean OD of negative control



> 0.8 and < 2.5



2.1



% mean relative viability of


positive control



< 50% of negative control



37.1%



Variation within replicates



< 20%



0.4% (negative control)
0.2% (positive control)
13.5% (test item)



Values for negative control and for positive control were within the range of historical data of the test facility (see page 22).


Therefore, the experiment is considered valid.

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP criteria for eye irritation not meet. No classification is required according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008
Conclusions:
CLP: non eye irritant. Not classified.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

See attached information

Justification for classification or non-classification

On the basis of the results, according to CLP regulation 1272/08, the subtance is not classified as eye or skin irritant.