Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 907-489-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 18 July to 3 November 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dimethyl adipate
- EC Number:
- 211-020-6
- EC Name:
- Dimethyl adipate
- Cas Number:
- 627-93-0
- Molecular formula:
- C8H14O4
- IUPAC Name:
- Dimethyl adipate
- Reference substance name:
- Dimethyl glutarate
- EC Number:
- 214-277-2
- EC Name:
- Dimethyl glutarate
- Cas Number:
- 1119-40-0
- Molecular formula:
- C7H12O4
- IUPAC Name:
- dimethyl glutarate
- Reference substance name:
- Dimethyl succinate
- EC Number:
- 203-419-9
- EC Name:
- Dimethyl succinate
- Cas Number:
- 106-65-0
- Molecular formula:
- C6H10O4
- IUPAC Name:
- dimethyl succinate
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Remarks:
- Colourless to brown liquid
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- batch No.of test material:CY71353002
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 01 June 2019
- Purity test date: 01 June 2017
- Analytical purity: 98.2%
- Commercial name of the registered substnace: Innroad Protect
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Refrigerated (2-8 °C)
- Stability under test conditions: Not assessed
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: DMSO was used as solvent to prepare the stock solution of the test material. Test solutions were freshly prepared at the beginning of the experiments in the testing laboratory by diluting the stock solution using the selected solvent and were used within 4 hours after preparation.
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: Not checked
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: Test solutions were freshly prepared at the beginning of the experiments in the testing laboratory by diluting the stock solution using DMSO
Method
- Target gene:
- The Salmonella typhimurium histidine (his) reversion system measures his- → his+ reversions. The Salmonella typhimurium strains are constructed to differentiate between base-pair (TA1535, TA100) and frameshift (TA1537, TA98) mutations. The Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA tryptophan (trp) reversion system measures trp- → trp+ reversions. The Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA detects mutagens that cause base-pair substitutions (AT to GC).
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 fraction) from rat liver homogenate
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Concentrations were selected on the basis of the Preliminary Solubility Test and Preliminary Range Finding Test. The maximum test concentration was 5000 μg test item/plate.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO and Distilled water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: In the study two vehicle (solvent) control groups were used depending on the solubility of the test item and the solubility of strain specific positive control chemicals.Test item was insoluble at 100 mg/mL concentration using Distilled water. The test item was soluble at this concentration using DMSO and DMF. Due to the better biocompatibility, DMSO was selected as vehicle (solvent) for the study.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO and distilled water
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- i.e. untreated controls
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine; 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: In the Preliminary Concentration Range Finding Test as well as in the Initial Mutation Test, the plate incorporation method was used. In the Confirmatory Mutation Test, the pre-incubation method was used.
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): not specified
DURATION
- Preincubation period: yes: 20 min at 37ºC in the Confirmatory Mutation Test (pre-incubation method)
- Exposure duration:48±1 hours at 37°C in the Initial Mutation Test (standard plate incorporation procedure) and the Confirmatory Mutation Test (pre-incubation method).
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): N/A
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): N/A
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): N/A - Evaluation criteria:
- Criteria for Validity:
The study was considered valid if:
- the number of revertant colonies of the negative (vehicle/solvent) and positive controls are in the relevant historical control range, generated at the test facility, in all tester strains of the main tests (with or without S9-mix);
- at least five analysable concentrations are presented in all strains of the main tests;
Criteria for a Positive Response:
A test item was considered mutagenic if:
- a concentration-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or;
- a reproducible biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one strain with or without metabolic activation.
An increase was considered biologically relevant if:
- the number of reversions is more than two times higher than the reversion rate of the negative (solvent) control in Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA bacterial strains;
- the number of reversions is more than three times higher than the reversion rate of the negative (solvent) control in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535 and TA1537 bacterial strains.
Criteria for a Negative Response:
A test article was considered non-mutagenic if:
- the total number of revertants in tester strain Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100 or Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA is not greater than two times the concurrent vehicle control, and the total number of revertants in tester strain Salmonella typhimurium TA1535 or TA1537 is not greater than three times the concurrent vehicle control;
- the negative response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment. - Statistics:
- Not perfomed
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was reported only in the confirmatory mutation test at the concentration of 5000 µg/plate.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was reported only in the confirmatory mutation test at the concentration of 5000 µg/plate.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was reported only in the confirmatory mutation test at the concentration of 5000 µg/plate.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was reported only in the confirmatory mutation test at the concentration of 5000 µg/plate.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Cytotoxicity was reported only in the confirmatory mutation test at the concentration of 5000 µg/plate.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
INITIAL AND CONFIRMATORY MUTATION TESTS:
In the Initial Mutation Test, the plate incorporation method was used. In the Confirmatory Mutation Test, the pre-incubation method was used. The Initial Mutation
Test and Confirmatory Mutation Test were carried out using four Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537) and the Escherichia coli
WP2 uvrA strain. The Initial Mutation Test and Confirmatory Mutation Test were performed in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. Each test was performed with appropriate untreated, negative (solvent) and positive controls. In the main tests each sample (including the controls) was tested in triplicate.
Based on the results of the preliminary experiment, the examined test concentrations in the Initial Mutation Test were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50 and 15.81 μg/plate. In the Confirmatory Mutation Test, the test concentrations were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81 and 5 μg/plate.
No precipitate was observed in the main tests in all examined strains with and without metabolic activation.
In the Confirmatory Mutation Test, reduced/slightly reduced background lawn was observed in all examined strains on the plates at 5000 μg/plate concentration with and without metabolic activation.
In the Initial Mutation Test and Confirmatory Mutation Test, the number of revertant colonies did not show any biologically relevant increase compared to the solvent
controls. There were no reproducible dose-related trends and there was no indication of any treatment-related effect.
In the Initial Mutation Test (plate incorporation method), the highest revertant rate was observed in Salmonella typhimurium TA1537 strain at 15.81 μg/plate
concentration without metabolic activation (the observed mutation factor value was: MF: 1.48). However, there was no dose-response relationship, the observed mutation factor values were below the biologically relevant threshold limit and the number of revertant colonies was within the historical control range.
In the Confirmatory Mutation Test (pre-incubation method), the highest revertant rate was observed in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 bacterial strain at 50 μg/plate
concentration with metabolic activation (the observed mutation factor value was: MF: 1.33). However, there was no dose-response relationship, the number of revertant colonies did not show any biologically relevant increase compared to the solvent controls and the number of revertant colonies was within the historical control range.
Higher numbers of revertant colonies compared to the vehicle (solvent) control were detected in the main tests in some other sporadic cases. However, no dose-dependence was observed in those cases and they were below the biologically relevant threshold value. The numbers of revertant colonies were within the historical control range in each case, so they were considered as reflecting the biological variability of the test.
Sporadically, lower revertant counts compared to the vehicle (solvent) control were observed in the main tests at some non-cytotoxic concentrations. However, no
background inhibition was recorded and the mean numbers of revertant colonies were in the historical control range in all cases, thus they were considered as biological variability of the test system.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions applied the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used (Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA).
In conclusion, the registered substance reaction mass of diethyl adipate and diethyl glutarate and diethyl succinate has no mutagenic activity on the growth of the bacterial strains under the test conditions used in this study. - Executive summary:
The test item, Innroad Protect (commercial name of the registered substance), was tested for potential mutagenic activity using the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay according to the OECD No. 471 guideline.
The experiments were carried out using histidine-requiring auxotroph strains of Salmonella typhimurium (Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535 and
TA1537) and the tryptophan-requiring auxotroph strain of Escherichia coli (Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA) in the presence and absence of a post mitochondrial supernatant (S9 fraction) prepared from the livers of phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavoneinduced rats.
The study included a Preliminary Compatibility Test, a Preliminary Range Finding Test (Informatory Toxicity Test), an Initial Mutation Test (Plate Incorporation Method) and a Confirmatory Mutation Test (Pre-Incubation Method).
Based on the results of the Compatibility Test, the test item was dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. Concentrations of
5000; 2500; 1000; 316; 100; 31.6 and 10 μg/plate were examined in the Range Finding Test in tester strains Salmonella typhimurium TA100 and TA98 in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. Based on the results of the Range Finding Test, the test item concentrations in the Initial Mutation Test were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50 and 15.81 μg/plate. In the Confirmatory Mutation Test, the test item concentrations were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81 and 5 μg/plate.
No precipitate was observed in the main tests in all examined strains with and without metabolic activation.
Inhibitory, cytotoxic effect of the test item (reduced / slightly reduced background lawn development) was observed in the Confirmatory Mutation Test in all examined strains with and without metabolic activation at 5000 μg/plate concentration. In the Initial Mutation Test and Confirmatory Mutation Test, the number of revertant
colonies did not show any biologically relevant increase compared to the solvent controls. There were no consistent dose-related trends and no indication of any
treatment-related effect.
The mean values of revertant colonies of the negative (vehicle/solvent) control plates were within the historical control range and the reference mutagens showed the
expected increase in the number of revertant colonies. The viability of the bacterial cells was checked by a plating experiment in each test. At least five analyzable
concentrations were presented in all strains of the main tests, the examined concentration range was considered to be adequate. The study was considered to be
valid.
The reported data of this mutagenicity assay show that under the experimental conditions applied the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes
or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
In conclusion, the registered substance Reation mass of diethyl adipate and diethyl glutarate and diethyl succinate has no mutagenic activity on the growth of the bacterial strains under the test conditions used in this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.