Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 222-793-4 | CAS number: 3615-41-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin:
QSAR. Unlikely to be irritating to skin. Reliability = 2
OECD 402, rat. No irritation. Reliability = 1
Human Repeat Insult Patch Test. Irritation in 1 of 106 subjects. Reliability = 2.
Eye: QSAR. Unlikely to be irritating to the eye. Reliability = 2
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Times v.2.27.17.6 in QSAR Toolbox
Toolbox prediction report is attached in IUCLID - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: CC{P+}(O)C{P+}(O)C{P-}(O)C{P-}(O)C=O
- Irritation parameter:
- other: QSAR skin irritation/corrosion
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Model indicates that the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the skin
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Model indicates that the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the skin
- Executive summary:
The Times model for skin irritation/corrosion was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The model indicates that the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the skin. Additional supporting documentation is provided in the prediction report attached in IUCLID.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA OPPTS 870.1200 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: MAFF Japan Test Guidelines for Agricultural Chemicals 12-Nousan-8147 (2000)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD(SD)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A.
- Age at study initiation: approximately 9 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 299.0-327.9 g (males); 213.2-226-8 g (females)
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Individually in solid-bottom caging with bedding and appropriate species-specific enrichment.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C) :20-26ºC (68-79ºF)
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): Not reported
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): approximate 12-hour light/dark cycle - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 5000 mg/kg body weight
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 14 days
- Number of animals:
- 5
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: approximately 37 square centimeters
- % coverage: approximately 10 percent of the total body surface area of rats in the 200 - 300 g body weig
ht range
- Type of wrap if used: 2-ply gauze patch. The rats were then wrapped with stretch gauze bandage and
self-adhesive bandage.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Washed with paper towels soaked in warm water
- Time after start of exposure: Approximately 24 hours
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 5000 mg/kg of body weight
- For solids, paste formed: yes
Details on study design
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: The rats were weighed on test days 1, 8, and 15, and were
observed daily for clinical signs of toxicity and dermal irritation (weekends and holidays excluded for
dermal irritation). The rats were reshaved as needed during the study.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- other: all animals
- Time point:
- other: 24-hours to 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- other: all animals
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours to 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: no oedema observed
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- There were no instances of edema or erythema observed.
- Other effects:
- Refer to acute dermal toxicity study DI.K1.Derm.R.D-21372-673.KD in IULICD section 7.2.3 (Acute toxicity: dermal) for additonal information.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- No instances of erythema or oedema were observed.
- Executive summary:
A single dose of the test substance was applied to the shaved, intact skin of 5 male and 5 female rats at a dose level of 5000 mg/kg of body weight. The application site was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing for 24 hours, after which the test substance was removed. The rats were observed for 14 days following application. The rats were necropsied to detect grossly observable evidence of organ or tissue damage at the end of the 15-day test period. There were no incidents of mortality and no overall (test day 1-15) body weight losses among any animals. One male exhibited scabbing on the back (inside of the test site) between test days 6-15 and discoloured skin on the back between test days 6-7. Between test days 12-15, a wound on the right shoulder was observed in one male. Epidermal scaling (inside the test site) was noted in one female between test days 6-8. No other clinical abnormalities were observed. There were no instances of oedema or erythema observed. Gross findings were present in 2/5 male animals, which correspond to the clinical observations noted above. One male had a skin ulcer/erosion present on the back at the outer edge of the treated skin area. The other male had a single skin ulcer/erosion present on the right shoulder. No other gross findings were observed. Under the conditions of this study, the dermal LD50 for the test substance was greater than 5000 mg/kg of body weight when applied to the skin of male and female rats for 24 hours.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Times v.2.27.17.6 in QSAR Toolbox
Toolbox prediction report is attached in IUCLID - GLP compliance:
- no
- Irritation parameter:
- other: QSAR eye irritation model
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Model indicates that the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the eye
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Model indicates that the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the eye.
- Executive summary:
The Times model for in vivo eye irritation was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The model indicates that the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the eye. Additional supporting documentation is provided in the prediction report attached in IUCLID.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The Times model for skin irritation/corrosion was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The model indicates that the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the skin. In an in vivo, dermal toxicity study, a single dose of the test substance was applied to the shaved, intact skin of 5 male and 5 female rats at a dose level of 5000 mg/kg of body weight. The application site was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing for 24 hours, after which the test substance was removed. The rats were observed for 14 days following application. There were no instances of oedema or erythema observed during the study. Additionally, a leave-on facial product containing 10% of the test substance was examined in a Human Repeated Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) with 48-72 h occlusive patches. Irritation reaction consisting of severe to mild erythema, bulla, colouration, fissuring, and scabbing was observed in only 1 of 106 subjects. Therefore, based on the data available, the test substance is not expected to be irritating to the skin.
The Times model for in vivo eye irritation was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The model indicates that the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the eye.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on QSAR and in vivo tests in rats and humans, the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the skin. Based on QSAR model, the test substance is unlikely to be irritating to the eye. Therefore, the substance does not need to be classified for skin or eye irritation according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.