Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
20 Feb 2017 - 01 jun 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell transformation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Decanoic acid, ester with 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol 2-ethylhexanoate octanoate
EC Number:
268-582-0
EC Name:
Decanoic acid, ester with 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol 2-ethylhexanoate octanoate
Cas Number:
68130-25-6
Molecular formula:
C10 H20 O2 . x C8 H16 O2 . x C8 H16 O2 . x C5 H12 O4
IUPAC Name:
Decanoic acid, ester with 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol 2-ethylhexanoate octanoate
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Identification: H-32
CAS No.: 68130-25-6
Batch: 64296
Purity: > 99%
Appearance: Pale yellow liquid
Expiry Date: 30 September 2018
Storage Conditions: At room temperature
Stability in Solvent: Not relevant
Purpose of Use: Industrial chemical
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: H-32
- CAS Number: 68130-25-6
- Sponsors Description: Pale yellow liquid
- Batch: 64296
- Purity: > 99%
- Molecular Weight: Theoretical value 704.6
Measured value 706.0
- Expiry Date: 30 September 2018
- Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes:
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
CELLS USED
- Source of cells:human lymphocytes
- Sex, age and number of blood donors if applicable:
Preliminary Toxicity Test: female, aged 33 years
Main Experiment: male, aged 29 years



MEDIA USED
- CO2 concentration if applicable: 5%
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (S9)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
i) 4-hour exposure without S9-mix - the dose range of test item used was 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128μg/mL.
ii) 4-hour exposure with S9-mix (2%) - the dose range of test item used was 0, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 and 256 μg/mL.
iii) 24-hour continuous exposure to the test item without S9-mix - the dose range of test item used was 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 and 128 μg/mL.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
mitomycin C
Remarks:
Mitomycin C used in abcence of S9-mix. Cyclophosphamide (CP) used in the presance of S9-mix
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 and 24 hours at approx 37 ºC, 5% CO2 in humidified air
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: dry slides were stained in 5% Giemsa for 5 minutes, rinsed, dried and a cover slip applied using mounting medium
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000
Evaluation criteria:
Providing that all of the acceptability criteria are fulfilled, a test item can be considered to be clearly negative if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
1) The number of cells with structural aberrations in all evaluated dose groups should be within the range of the laboratory historical control data.
2) No toxicologically or statistically significant increase of the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations is observed following statistical analysis.
3) There is no concentration-related increase at any dose level
A test item can be classified as genotoxic if:
1) The number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations is outside the range of the laboratory historical control data.
2) At least one concentration exhibits a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations compared to the concurrent negative control.
3) The observed increase in the frequency of cells with structural aberrations is considered to be dose-related
When all of the above criteria are met, the test item can be considered able to induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes.
Although the inclusion of the structural chromosome aberrations is the purpose of this study, it is important to include numerical aberrations in the form of polyploidy and endoreduplicated cells.
Statistics:
The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher's Exact test. (Richardson et al. 1989).
A toxicologically significant response is recorded when the p value calculated from the statistical analysis of the frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps is less than 0.05 when compared to its concurrent control and there is a dose-related increase in the frequency of cells with aberrations which is reproducible. Incidences where marked statistically significant increases are observed only with gap-type aberrations will be assessed on a case by case basis.

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
other: Human lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

    Dose level (µg/mL)     24 Hour without S9
 Mean  % Control Group
0 5.65  100
2  -
4 -  -
 8  7.50  133
 16  8.33  147
 32  8.65  153
 64  -  -
 128  -  -
 MMC 0.1  2.9  51

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test item was non-toxic and did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, using a dose range that included a dose level that was the lowest precipitating dose level.

The test item,was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
Executive summary:

Introduction

This report describes the results of an in vitro study for the detection of structural chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells. It supplements microbial systems insofar as it identifies potential mutagens that produce chromosomal aberrations rather than gene mutations (Scott et al., 1991).

Methods

Duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes, treated with the test item, were evaluated for chromosome aberrations at three dose levels, together with vehicle and positive controls. In this study, three exposure conditions were investigated; 4 hours exposure in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (S9), at a 2% final concentration with cell harvest after a 20-hour expression period, 4 hours exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20-hour expression period and a 24-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation.

The dose levels used in the Main Experiment were selected using data from the preliminary toxicity test where the results indicated that the maximum concentration should be limited on precipitate. The dose levels selected for the Main Test were as follows:

 Group  Final concentration of test item H-32 (μg/mL)
 4(20)-hour without S9  0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128
 4(20)-hour with S9 (2%)  0, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256
 24-hour without S9  0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128

Results

All vehicle (acetone) controls had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes.

All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.

The test item was non-toxic and did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, using a dose range that included a dose level that was the lowest precipitating dose level.

Conclusion

The test item, H-32 was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.