Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: other routes
Remarks:
Cytotoxicity Assay in vitro with BALB/c 3T3 Cells: Neutral Red Test
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Experimental start date: 23 November 2016 Experimental completion date: 16 December 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: • OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals: Guideline: 432; In vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test (Revised and approved by the National Co-ordinators in May 2002, approved by Council April 2004).
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 B 41", dated May 30, 2008.
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) Note for Guidance on Photosafety testing, EMEA, CPMP/SWP/398/01, adopted 27 June 2002, into operation in Dec 2002.
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Chemical Name: N-[2-(2-Hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]acetamide
CAS No.: 118974-46-2
Batch: 27191705
Purity: 82% (dose calculation was adjusted to puriy)
Appearance: Pale to yellow liquid
Expiry Date: 16 June 2017
Storage Conditions: At room temperature
Stability in Solvent: Stable in water (not quantified)
Purpose of Use: Industrial chemical

Test animals

Species:
other: BALB/c 3T3 cell line
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Details on mammalian cell line
The BALB/c 3T3 cell line was isolated from the muscle tissue of the mouse embryo. This fibroblast cell line has a high proliferation rate (doubling time 16 - 20 hours in stock cultures) and a high plating efficiency of untreated cells (as a rule more than 70%) both necessary for the appropriate performance of the study. The cell line BALB/c 3T3 was isolated first by Aaronson and Todaro.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
other: In vitro exposure of cells
Vehicle:
other: EBSS
Details on exposure:
Test concentrations with justification for top dose
The following concentrations were tested (each concentration of the test item was tested in six replicates: with and without irradiation in both experiments 7.81 15.6 31.3 62.5 125 250 500 1000 µg/mL of the test item
Doses:
The following concentrations were tested (each concentration of the test item was tested in six replicates: with and without irradiation in both experiments 7.81 15.6 31.3 62.5 125 250 500 1000 µg/mL of the test item
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
The neutral red (NR) test was developed by Borenfreund & Puerner and is used for the investigation of the cytotoxic potential of a test item. In this study the toxicity of the test item after irradiation with artificial sunlight is determined. The test protocol was developed in 1991 at Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg and validated in an ECVAM, COLIPA, and ZEBET coordinated ring trial. The study was initiated involving 11 laboratories.
The NR assay is based on the uptake of neutral red, a vital dye, and its accumulation in the lysosomes of viable uninjured cells. After storing the neutral red in the lysosomes of the viable uninjured cells, they are lysed with a mixture of deionised water (49% (v/v)), ethanol (50% (v/v)) and glacial acetic acid (1% (v/v)). The extracted neutral red is quantified photometrically at 540 nm.
For the determination of a phototoxic potential the cells were treated with various concentrations of the test item with and without irradiation with artificial sunlight (wave length > 320 nm). The cytotoxic response curves of the test groups were compared. The IC50-values were determined and compared to measure a possible phototoxicity

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Dose descriptor:
other: No cytotoxicity observed
Effect level:
> 1 000 other: µg/mL
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Results AND DISCUSSION

Table2   RFE: Treatment of BALB/c 3T3 withElfaMoist AC

With artificial sunlight

Without artificial sunlight

Conc. [µg/mL]

O.D.540 nmMean Value

Standard Deviation

% of Solv. Control

Conc. [µg/mL]

O.D.540 nmMean Value

Standard Deviation

% of Solv. Control

Solvent Control

0.7028*

0.0311

100.00

Solvent Control

0.7372*

0.0459

100.00

7.81

0.7067

0.0121

100.56

7.81

0.7258

0.0161

98.45

15.6

0.7078

0.0198

100.71

15.6

0.7017

0.0304

95.17

31.3

0.7011

0.0174

99.75

31.3

0.7132

0.0428

96.73

62.5

0.7221

0.0181

102.75

62.5

0.7201

0.0231

97.67

125

0.7058

0.0139

100.43

125

0.7119

0.0439

96.56

250

0.6832

0.0098

97.21

250

0.6820

0.0370

92.51

500

0.7209

0.0274

102.57

500

0.7053

0.0381

95.66

1000

0.6912

0.0191

98.34

1000

0.7015

0.0281

95.15

* mean O.D.540 nmout of 12 wells

IC50values = could not be determined, since the viability of the cells was not reduced with and without irradiation

PIF = could not be determined, since no IC50values could be calculated

MPE = -0.044

Mean OD540 nmsolvent control value (viability) irradiated versus non-irradiated group: 95.3%

 

Table3   RFE:Treatmentof BALB/c 3T3with the Positive Control (chlorpromazine)

With artificial sunlight

Without artificial sunlight

Conc.[µg/mL]

O.D.540 nmMean Value

Standard Deviation

% of Solv.Control

Conc. [µg/mL]

O.D.540 nmMean Value

Standard Deviation

% of Solv. Control

Solvent Control

0.6892*

0.0590

100.00

Solvent Control

0.7584*

0.0768

100.00

0.125

0.6597

0.0627

95.72

6.25

0.7020

0.0177

92.56

0.250

0.4959

0.0534

71.95

12.5

0.3755

0.0226

49.51

0.500

0.3743

0.0403

54.31

25.0

0.0628

0.0050

8.28

0.750

0.3494

0.0429

50.69

37.5

0.0585

0.0029

7.72

1.000

0.2653

0.0669

38.49

50.0

0.0561

0.0011

7.39

1.500

0.0667

0.0106

9.68

75.0

0.0578

0.0025

7.62

2.000

0.0602

0.0032

8.73

100

0.0594

0.0021

7.83

4.000

0.0623

0.0037

9.04

200

0.0601

0.0037

7.93

* mean O.D.540 nmout of 12 wells

IC50value (with artificial sunlight) = 0.60 µg/mL

IC50value (without artificial sunlight) = 11.88 µg/mL

PIF = 20.04

MPE = 0.540

Mean OD540nm solvent control value (viability) irradiated versus non-irradiated group: 90.9%

Table4   ME: Treatment of BALB/c 3T3 withElfaMoist AC

With artificial sunlight

Without artificial sunlight

Conc. [µg/mL]

O.D.540 nmMean Value

Standard Deviation

% of Solv. Control

Conc. [µg/mL]

O.D.540 nmMean Value

Standard Deviation

% of Solv. Control

Solvent Control

0.8461*

0.0291

100.00

Solvent Control

0.8195*

0.0356

100.00

7.81

0.8595

0.0234

101.58

7.81

0.8027

0.0173

97.95

15.6

0.8571

0.0348

101.30

15.6

0.7830

0.0264

95.55

31.3

0.8404

0.0282

99.33

31.3

0.7726

0.0179

94.28

62.5

0.8437

0.0138

99.72

62.5

0.7847

0.0227

95.75

125

0.8310

0.0365

98.22

125

0.8018

0.0214

97.84

250

0.8239

0.0252

97.38

250

0.7753

0.0201

94.60

500

0.8073

0.0223

95.41

500

0.7865

0.0266

95.97

1000

0.8264

0.0186

97.68

1000

0.7695

0.0288

93.89

* mean O.D.540 nmout of 12 wells

IC50values = could not be determined, since the viability of the cells was not reduced with and without irradiation

PIF = could not be determined, since no IC50values could be calculated

MPE = -0.029

Mean OD540 nmsolvent control value (viability) irradiated versus non-irradiated group: 103.2%

 

Table 5   ME:Treatmentof BALB/c 3T3with the Positive Control (chlorpromazine)

With artificial sunlight

Without artificial sunlight

Conc.[µg/mL]

O.D.540 nmMean Value

Standard Deviation

% of Solv.Control

Conc. [µg/mL]

O.D.540 nmMean Value

Standard Deviation

% of Solv. Control

Solvent Control

0.7766*

0.0172

100.00

Solvent Control

0.8160*

0.0193

100.00

0.125

0.7573

0.0271

97.50

6.25

0.8228

0.0171

100.84

0.250

0.7221

0.0339

92.98

12.5

0.1285

0.0103

15.75

0.500

0.5974

0.0373

76.92

25.0

0.0675

0.0056

8.27

0.750

0.4479

0.0609

57.67

37.5

0.0677

0.0096

8.29

1.000

0.1292

0.0133

16.63

50.0

0.0666

0.0069

8.16

1.500

0.0882

0.0070

11.36

75.0

0.0689

0.0107

8.44

2.000

0.0839

0.0083

10.80

100

0.0679

0.0075

8.33

4.000

0.0919

0.0088

11.83

200

0.0720

0.0161

8.83

* mean O.D.540 nmout of 12 wells

IC50value (with artificial sunlight) = 0.77 µg/mL

IC50value (without artificial sunlight) = 10.72 µg/mL

PIF = 13.89

MPE = 0.548

Mean OD540nm solvent control value (viability) irradiated versus non-irradiated group: 95.2%

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Reaction mass of N-[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]acetamide and glycerol did not have any phototoxic effects on BALB/c 3T3 cells, and showed no cytotoxicity up to the highest tested concentration of 1000 µg/mL.
Executive summary:

The study was performed to assess the phototoxic potential of reaction mass of N-[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]acetamide and glycerol. The test was performed using BALB/c 3T3 cells clone 31.

1000 µg/mL of the test item, dissolved in EBSS were applied as the highest concentration.

The experiment was performed twice. The first experiment served as a range finding experiment (RFE), the second experiment was the main experiment (ME).

The following concentrations of the test item were tested with and without irradiation in both experiments:

7.81, 15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000 µg/mL

As solvent control EBSS was used.

Chlorpromazine was used as positive control. The following concentrations were applied:

without irradiation

6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 37.5, 50, 75, 100, 200 µg/mL

with irradiation

0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 4.0 µg/mL

In both experiments one test group of cells treated with the test item was irradiated withartificial sunlight for 50 minutes with 1.65 mW/cm2UVA, resulting in an irradiation dose of~ 5 J/cm2UVA. Another test group of test item treated cells were kept in the dark for 50 minutes.

Table1            Summary of Results

 

Test Item

IC50(+UV) [µg/mL]

IC50(-UV) [µg/mL]

PIF

MPE

% viability of solvent control of irradiated versus non irradiated plate

RFE

ElfaMoist AC

-

-

-

-0.044

95.3

Positive control

0.60

11.88

20.04

0.540

90.9

ME

ElfaMoist AC

-

-

-

-0.029

103.2

Positive control

0.77

10.72

13.89

0.548

95.2

In both experiments no cytotoxic effects were observed after treatment of cells with reaction mass of N-[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]acetamide and glycerol, neither in the presence nor in the absence of irradiation with artificial sunlight. Therefore, IC50-values or PIFs could not be calculated. The resulting MPE was -0.044 or -0.029, respectively,and therefore, the test item is classified as not phototoxic.

The positive control chlorpromazine induced phototoxicity in the expected range after irradiation with artificial sunlight.

In conclusion, it can be stated that in the study described and under the experimental conditions reported Reaction mass of N-[2-(2-hydroxyethoxy)ethyl]acetamide and glycerol did not have any phototoxic effects on BALB/c 3T3 cells.