Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 945-910-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1985
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study following a method equivalent to a recognised guideline with acceptable deviations.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 985
- Report date:
- 1985
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Only 10 animals used within the study, guideline recommends 20.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method employed in this study for the detection of delayed contact hypersensitivity was the guinea-pig test described by Buehler, E.V., Arch. Dermatol. 91, 171, (1965) and updated by Buehler, E.V. and Ritz, H.L., Current Concepts in Cutaneous Toxicity, pp. 215-40, (1980). Applicant accessment indicates that the scoring appears consistent with: Buehler, E.V. and Griffin F. Animal Models Dermatol., 55, (1975)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The test was conducted prior to 11 October 2016 as stated under Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1688 and is used by read-across and as part of a Weight of Evidence adaptation under Regulation (EC) 1907/2006: Annex XI: section 1.5 read-across and Annex XI: section 1.2 weight of evidence.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Methyl 2-[[(2,4-dimethyl-3-cyclohexen-1-yl)methylene]amino]benzoate
- EC Number:
- 272-449-2
- EC Name:
- Methyl 2-[[(2,4-dimethyl-3-cyclohexen-1-yl)methylene]amino]benzoate
- Cas Number:
- 68845-02-3
- Molecular formula:
- C17H21NO2
- IUPAC Name:
- methyl 2-[[(2,4-dimethylcyclohex-3-en-1-yl)methylidene]amino]benzoate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Liquid
- Other: clear yellow
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Recognised supplier
- Weight at study initiation: 417 - 460g (test group); 392-480g (control)
- Housing: In groups of five in grid bottomed polypropylene cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): vitamin-C enriched pelleted diet ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 17 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17- 25°C
- Humidity (%): Not reported.
- Air changes (per hr): Air conditioned room (air changes not reported).
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light / 12 hours dark
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: ethanol
- Concentration / amount:
- Preliminary irritation testing: topical (occlusive): 12.5, 25, 50%v/v (ethanol) and 100% (undiluted)
Induction: - Topical: 100% (undiluted)
Challenge: - Topical: 100% (undiluted) and 50%v/v (ethanol) - Adequacy of induction:
- highest technically applicable concentration used
Challenge
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: ethanol
- Concentration / amount:
- Preliminary irritation testing: topical (occlusive): 12.5, 25, 50%v/v (ethanol) and 100% (undiluted)
Induction: - Topical: 100% (undiluted)
Challenge: - Topical: 100% (undiluted) and 50%v/v (ethanol) - Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- Test group: 10
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Preliminary Investigations: The intradermal and topical irritancy of a range of dilutions of the test substance was investigated.Four concentrations of the test material (100%, 50%, 25% and 12.5%) were used. The dilutions were prepared using ethanol. Each concentration was applied to one of four sites. The results of this dose ranging study indicated that the undiluted material was unlikely to act as a primary irritant at up to 100% (undiluted) concentration.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
Topical induction: A 0.5ml aliquot of neat test substance dorsal area was applied to the clipped left shoulder for 6 hours under occlusion (a 20mm square of surgical lint covered with surgical tape and elastic adhesive). Induction applications were made on days 1, 8 and 15. Controls were treated with ethanol vehicle only. This dosing procedure was repeated at weekly intervals on days eight and fifteen.
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: On day 28 of the study, 6-hour occluded challenge applications were made to the right flank with 50%v/v and 100% (undiluted) test item using (a 20mm square of surgical lint covered with surgical tape and elastic adhesive).
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 100% and 50%v/v
- Control group: 0% (vehicle only)
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours. - Challenge controls:
- Previously naive test group (treated only with vehicle) was treated with the test item as a challenge control at 50%v/v (in ethanol) and 100% (undiluted).
- Positive control substance(s):
- no
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No significant clinical signs, all gained bodyweight
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: No significant clinical signs, all gained bodyweight.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No significant clinical signs, all gained bodyweight
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: No significant clinical signs, all gained bodyweight.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No significant clinical signs, all gained bodyweight
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: No significant clinical signs, all gained bodyweight.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No significant clinical signs, all gained bodyweight
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: No significant clinical signs, all gained bodyweight.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Dermal reactions elicited in challenge application
Group |
|
100% |
|
50% |
|
|
No. +ve reactions |
|
|
24 hour |
48 hour |
24 hour |
48 hour |
|
|
Test |
1* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
Control |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
18 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
* Due to a technical error number 1 - occlusive dressing remained in position for 24 hours rather than 6 hours.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study used, the test material is not considered to be a contact sensitizer.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed according to a method equivalent to guideline OECD TG 406 consistent with Buehler method under GLP to assess the skin sensitisation potential of the test substance. The study was conducted using a preliminary irritation screen, an induction phase and a challenge phase. Preliminary irritation testing was for use in the induction phases of the study and the challenge phase of the study. Two groups, each of ten animals, were used for the study which was divided into an induction stage and a challenge stage. The induction stage consisted of three topical applications of the test material to the left shoulder of each of the ten test animals. These applications were made on Days one, eight and fifteen and each application lasted for six hours. Fourteen days after completion of the induction stage, all animals were challenged with two concentrations of the test material that had shown no evidence of irritation during the dose ranging study. No visible response was exhibited by any animal of the test or control group when challenged with the undiluted material and a 50% concentration of the material in ethanol. Under the conditions of this study, the test substance is not considered to be a contact sensitizer.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.