Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-384-1 | CAS number: 941-98-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- This in vitro assay was performed to assess the potential of Methyl-2-napthyl ether (CAS no. 93-04-9) to induce structural / numerical chromosomal aberrations in one experiment (phase I). The induction of cytogenetic damage in human lymphocytes was assessed with and without metabolic activation. Due to the negative result in phase I, a second experiment (phase II) was performed.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- other: In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Methyl 2-naphthyl ether
- EC Number:
- 202-213-6
- EC Name:
- Methyl 2-naphthyl ether
- Cas Number:
- 93-04-9
- Molecular formula:
- C11H10O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methoxynaphthalene
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): methyl 2-naphthyl ether
- Molecular formula: C11H10O
- Molecular weight: 158.19 g/mol
- Substance type:Organic
- Physical state:Soild
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- No data
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human peripheral blood lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Human blood
- Suitability of cells: No data
- Cell cycle length, doubling time or proliferation index:
- Sex, age and number of blood donors if applicable:Age: 25-30 years age
- Whether whole blood or separated lymphocytes were used if applicable: Separated lymphocytes were used
- Number of passages if applicable: No data
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture if applicable: No data
- Modal number of chromosomes: No data
- Normal (negative control) cell cycle time: No data
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media including CO2 concentration if applicable: Blood cultures were set up in medium containing RPMI-1640, Fetal Bovine Serum, Phytohaemagglutinin, Heparin solution, Whole Blood and Antibiotic Solution
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: No data
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: No data
- Periodically 'cleansed' against high spontaneous background: No data - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 metabolic activation system
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.00 (NC), 0.00025 (T1), 0.0005 (T2) and 0.001 (T3) mg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): A volume of 7.92 mL of proliferating culture was dispensed to individual sterile culture tubes/flasks
DURATION
- Preincubation period: No data
- Exposure duration: Phase 1: 4 hrs (with and without metabolic activation system)
Phase 2: 4 hrs (with metabolic activation system) and 24 hrs (without metabolic activation system)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): Phase 1: 20 hrs (with and without metabolic activation system)
Phase 2: 20 hrs (with metabolic activation system)
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent):No data
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 hrs
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa stain in phosphate buffer
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: No data
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: The cultures were incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for duration (exposure period) as mentioned. For Phase I, after incubation cells were spun down by gentle centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant with the dissolved test item was discarded and the cells were re-suspended in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS). The washing procedure was repeated once again. After washing the cells were re-suspended in complete culture medium (RPMI-1640 with 10 % serum) and cultured at 37 ± 2 °C for 1.5 normal cell cycle lengths (22 - 25 hours). The cultures were harvested at the end of incubation of 24 hours after treatment. Before 3 hours of harvesting, 240 µL of colcemid (10 µg/mL) (final concentration: 0.3 µg/mL) was added to each of the culture tube, and kept under incubation at 37 ± 2 °C. The cultures were harvested 24 hours after beginning of treatment by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were re-suspended in 7 mL of freshly prepared, pre-warmed (37 ± 2 °C) hypotonic solution of potassium chloride (0.075 M KCl). Then the cell suspension was allowed to stand at 37 ± 2 °C for 30 minutes in water bath. After hypotonic treatment, the culture was centrifuged and supernatant was removed. After that 5 mL of freshly prepared, chilled Carnoy’s fixative (3:1 methanol: acetic acid solution) was added and left for 5 min. The cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with Carnoy’s fixative. After the final centrifugation, the supernatant was removed completely, and the cell pellet resuspended in 0.5 mL of Carnoy’s fixative. The slides were prepared by dropping the cell suspension onto a clean ice-chilled microscope slide. The labelled slides were dried over a slide warmer at 50°C and labelled. At least one slide was made from each sample. The cells were stained with 5 % fresh Giemsa stain in phosphate buffer and mounted using DPX mountant.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: A minimum of 1000 cells were counted in different fields of slide per culture and the number of metaphases were recorded for mitotic index (MI) calculation.
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): 300 well spread metaphase plates per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides.
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: No data
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: Mitotic index
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: Cytotoxicity was assessed at the concentrations of 0.00 (NC), 0.00025 (T7), 0.0005 (T8) and 0.001 (T9) mg/mL of culture media.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes
- Determination of endoreplication: Yes
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): No data
- OTHER: No data - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item can be classified as clastogenic if:
At least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent vehicle control
If the increase is dose-related
Any of the results are outside the historical negative control range
A test item can be classified as non – clastogenic if:
None of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control
If there is no dose-related increase
All results are within the historical negative control range
Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the non-parametric Mann Whitney Test. However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together.
If the above mentioned criteria for the test item are not clearly met, the classification with regard to the historical data and the biological relevance is discussed and/or a confirmatory experiment is performed. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance at the p < 0.05 was evaluated by means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Human perpheral blood lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In the cytotoxicity experiment III the highest test concentration 0.001 (T9) mg/ mL of culture media show 41.8 % reduction in absence of metabolic activation and 42.18% in the presence of metabolic activation indicates slight cytotoxicity of test item
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: The pH of test item in culture medium was assessed at 0 h and 4 h after incubation at 37 ± 2 °C. Significant change in pH was not observed at 0 h and 4 h when compared with negative controls.
- Effects of osmolality: No data
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation: There was no precipitation observed at 0.0625 mg/mL concentration
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: To evaluate the toxicity of the test item a cytotoxicity assay was performed both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system. Three test concentrations (0.00025, 0.0005 and 0.001 mg/mL of culture media) based on the solubility, precipitation and pH test of the test item were tested. Cytotoxicity was determined by reduction in the mitotic index in comparison with vehicle control. The procedure for conducting cytotoxicity was the same as main experiment phase I up to the scoring of the mitotic index, except slide coding.
Before conducting the chromosomal aberration study, Methyl-2-napthyl ether (CAS no. 93-04-9) was evaluated for cytotoxicity both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation system (1%). Cytotoxicity was assessed at the concentrations of 0.016 (T1), 0.0312 (T2) and 0.0625 (T3) mg/mL at initial cytotoxicity experiment (cytotxicity experiment I). All the tested concentrations at intial cytotoxicity experiment were cytotoxic. A second cytotoxicity experiment (cytotoxicity experiment II) was conducted with 0.002 (T4), 0.004 (T5) and 0.008 (T6) mg/mL of culture media. In second cytotoxicity experiment all tested concentrations were cytotoxic.
Hence one more cytotoxicity experiment (cytotoxic experiment III) was conducted with further lower concentrations of 0.00025 (T7), 0.0005 (T8) and 0.001 (T9) mg/mL of culture media. In the absence of S9 mix, the mean mitotic index observed was 10.03 (NC), 9.95 (VC), 8.69 (T7), 6.54 (T8), 5.79 (T9) and 8.54 (PC). In the presence of S9 mix, the mean mitotic index observed was 10.05 (NC), 9.94 (VC), 8.84 (T7), 6.55 (T8), 5.74 (T9) and 8.55 (PC).
In the cytotoxicity experiment III the highest test concentration 0.001 (T9) mg/ mL of culture media show 41.8 % reduction in absence of metabolic activation and 42.18% in the presence of metabolic activation indicates slight cytotoxicity of test item. Hence 0.001 was selected as highest concentaration for main study considering the selection of test concentrations upto cytotoxicity. The mitotic index when compared to the respective vehicle control both in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
Hence the concentrations selected for the main study are 0.00025, 0.0005 and 0.001 mg/mL. The main study was performed in two independent phases;
CYTOKINESIS BLOCK (if used)
- Distribution of mono-, bi- and multi-nucleated cells: No data
NUMBER OF CELLS WITH MICRONUCLEI
- Number of cells for each treated and control culture: No data
- Indication whether binucleate or mononucleate where appropriate: No data
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: No data
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: Please refer table remarks section
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: No data
- Other observations when applicable: No data - Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
Any other information on results incl. tables
Cytotoxicity results:
Before conducting the chromosomal aberration study, Methyl-2-napthyl ether (CAS no. 93-04-9) was evaluated for cytotoxicity both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation system (1%). Cytotoxicity was assessed at the concentrations of 0.016 (T1), 0.0312 (T2) and 0.0625 (T3) mg/mL at initial cytotoxicity experiment (cytotxicityexperiment I). All the tested concentrations atintialcytotoxicity experiment were cytotoxic. A second cytotoxicity experiment (cytotoxicity experiment II) was conducted with 0.002 (T4), 0.004 (T5) and 0.008 (T6) mg/mL of culture media. In second cytotoxicity experiment all tested concentrations were cytotoxic.
Hence one more cytotoxicity experiment (cytotoxic experiment III) was conducted with further lower concentrations of 0.00025 (T7), 0.0005 (T8) and 0.001 (T9) mg/mL of culture media. In the absence of S9 mix, the mean mitotic index observed was 10.03 (NC), 9.95 (VC), 8.69 (T7), 6.54 (T8), 5.79 (T9) and 8.54 (PC). In the presence of S9 mix, the mean mitotic index observed was 10.05 (NC), 9.94 (VC), 8.84 (T7), 6.55 (T8), 5.74 (T9) and 8.55 (PC).
In the cytotoxicity experiment III the highest test concentration 0.001 (T9) mg/ mL of culture media show 41.8 % reduction in absence of metabolic activation and 42.18% in the presence of metabolic activation indicates slight cytotoxicity of test item. Hence0.001 mg/mL was selected as highest concentaration for main study considering the selection of test concentrations upto cytotoxicity. The mitotic index when compared to the respective vehicle control both in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
Hence the concentrations selected for the main study are 0.00025, 0.0005 and 0.001 mg/mL. The main study was performed in two independent phases;
Phase 1 results:
In the experiment, the cultures were exposed to Methyl-2-napthyl ether (CAS no. 93-04-9) for a short period of time (4 h) both in the absence and in the presence of metabolic activation system (1%). The mean percentage of aberrant cells was 0.333 (NC), 0.667 (VC), 0.667 (T1), 0.667 (T2), 0.667 (T3) and 10.333 (PC) in the absence of metabolic activation and 0.667 (NC), 0.667 (VC), 0.667 (T1), 0.6676 (T2), 0.667 (T3) and 10.000 (PC) in the presence of metabolic activation at the concentration of 0.00 (NC), 0.00 (VC), 0.00025 (T1), 0.0005 (T2) and 0.001 (T3) mg/mL and positive controls, respectively.
Treatment with Ethyl methanesulfonate at the concentration of 600 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation and Cyclophosphamidemonohydrate at the concentration of30 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation (1%) causedsignificant increase in percent aberrant cells.Even though the analysis did not reveal any statistical significance, the increase was biologically significant.
During thetreatment with test item in the absence and presence of S9 mix, there was noreduction in mitotic index observed at the tested concentrations. The observed mean mitotic indexin the absence of metabolic activation were 10.02, 9.93, 8.58, 6.69, 5.39 and 8.48 andin the presence ofmetabolic activation were 10.02, 10.03, 8.73, 6.33, 5.68 and 8.62 for NC, VC, T1, T2, T3 and PC concentrations respectively.
Phase 2 results:
The phase II experiment was performed to confirm the negative results obtained in the absence and in the presence of metabolic activation in Phase I. In the Phase II, test item concentrations used were 0.00025 (T1), 0.0005 (T2) and 0.001 (T3) mg/mL culture both in presence and in absence of metabolic activation (2%). The duration of exposure to the test item in presence of metabolic activation system was 4 hours and in absence of metabolic activation the duration of exposure was 24 hours. The mean percent aberrant cells were 0.667 (NC), 0.667 (VC), 0.667 (T1), 0.667 (T2), 0.667 (T3) and 9.667 (PC) in the absence of metabolic activation and 0.667 (NC), 0.333 (VC), 0.333 (T1), 0.667 (T2), 0.667 (T3) and 10.000 (PC) in the presence of metabolic activation at the concentration of 0.00 (NC), 0.00 (VC), 0.00025 (T1), 0.0005 (T2) and 0.001 (T3) mg/mL of culture and positive control, respectively.
Treatment with Ethyl methanesulfonate at the concentration of 600 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation and Cyclophosphamidemonohydrate at the concentration of30 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation (2%) causedsignificant increase in percent aberrant cells.Though the analysis did not reveal any statistical significance, the increase was biologically significant.
The increased frequency of aberrations observed in the concurrent positive control groups (Phase I and II) demonstrated the sensitivity of the test system, suitability of the methods and conditions employed in the experiment.
Treatment with test item in the absence and presence of S9 mix, there was no reduction in mitotic index was observed at the tested concentrations. The observed mean mitotic indexin the absence of metabolic activation were 9.99, 10.01, 8.12, 6.78, 5.59 and 8.48 andin the presence ofmetabolic activation were 9.97, 9.94, 8.67, 6.68, 5.54 and 8.62 for NC, VC, T1, T2, T3 and PC concentrations respectively.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Test chemical is non-clastogenic at the highest tested concentration of 0.001mg/ml both in the presence (1% and 2%) and in the absence of metabolic activation under the specified conditions and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
- Executive summary:
This study was conducted to determine the chromosomal aberration induction potential of test chemical in human peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures. The methods followed were as per OECD guideline No. 473, adopted on 29thJuly 2016 “ In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test. The experiment was conducted using human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Blood was drawn from a healthy volunteer, by venous puncture using heparinised syringe. The experiment was performed both in the presence and in the absence of metabolic activation system after 48 h mitogenic stimulation. The test chemical was dissolved in DMSO and used at dose level of 0, 0.00025, 0.0005 and 0.001 mg/mL.in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system in phase 1 and phase 2. Phase I of experiment was performed by short term treatment method both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system(1%). Phase II of experiment was performed by short term treatment as well as long term treatment method. Long term treatment was performed in absence of metabolic activation to confirm the negative results obtained in the absence of metabolic activation in Phase I. Short term treatment method was performed with increased metabolic activation (2%) condition to confirm the negative results obtained in the presence of metabolic activation in Phase I. The doses for the main study were based on the cytotoxicity study conducted both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system. 3 test concentrations (0.5, 1 and 2mg/mL of culture media) based on the solubility, precipitation and pH test of the test item were tested. Cytotoxicity was determined by reduction in the mitotic index in comparison with negative control. The medium of the proliferatingblood culture was removed by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes. The cells were suspended in plain medium (medium without serum) mixed with S9 mix (Phase I - 1 % and Phase II - 2 % v/v) and in complete media mixed with phosphate buffer for the treatment in presence and in absence of metabolic activation system respectively. A volume of 7.92 mL of proliferating culture was dispensed to individual sterile culture tubes/flasks. Each tube/flask according to treatment groups was identified. Negative control tubes were treated with 80 µL of RPMI media and treatment group were treated with 80 µL of respective test item stock solution. The cultures were incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for duration (exposure period). For Phase I, after incubation cells were spun down by gentle centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant with the dissolved test item was discarded and the cells were re-suspended in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS). The washing procedure was repeated once again. After washing the cells were re-suspended in complete culture medium (RPMI-1640 with 10 % serum) and cultured at 37 ± 2 °C for 1.5 normal cell cycle lengths (22 - 25 hours). The cultures were harvested at the end of incubation of 24 hours after treatment. Before 3 hours of harvesting, 240 µL of colcemid (10 µg/mL) (final concentration: 0.3 µg/mL) was added to each of the culture tube, and kept under incubation at 37 ± 2 °C. The cultures were harvested 24 hours after beginning of treatment by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were re-suspended in 7 mL of freshly prepared, pre-warmed (37 ± 2 °C) hypotonic solution of potassium chloride (0.075 M KCl). Then the cell suspension was allowed to stand at 37 ± 2 °C for 30 minutes in water bath. After hypotonic treatment, the culture was centrifuged and supernatant was removed. After that 5 mL of freshly prepared, chilled Carnoy’s fixative (3:1 methanol: acetic acid solution) was added and left for 5 min. The cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with Carnoy’s fixative. After the final centrifugation, the supernatant was removed completely, and the cell pellet resuspended in 0.5 mL of Carnoy’s fixative. The slides were prepared by dropping the cell suspension onto a clean ice-chilled microscope slide. The slides were dried over a slide warmer and labelled. At least two slide was made from each sample. The cells were stained with 5 % fresh Giemsa stain in phosphate buffer and mounted using DPX mountant. Evaluation of the slides was performed using microscopes with 100 x oil immersion objectives. A minimum of 1000 cells were counted in different fields of slide per culture and the number of metaphases were recorded for mitotic index (MI) calculation.300 well spread metaphase plates per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. Evaluation of the slides was performed using microscopes with 100 x oil immersion objectives. Chromosomal and chromatid breaks, acentric fragments, deletions, exchanges, pluverization, polyploidy (including endoreduplication) and disintegrations were recorded as structural chromosomal aberrations. Gaps were recorded as well, but they were not included in the calculation of the aberration rates. Only metaphases with 46± 2 centromere regions were included in the analysis. Test chemical is non-clastogenic at the highest tested concentration of 0.001mg/ml both in the presence (1% and 2%) and in the absence of metabolic activation under the specified conditions and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.