Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 450-630-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The substance is not irritant for the skin and eye.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was performed in accordance with validated guidelines and in GLP compliance.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- The age at treatment of the Rabbit was 10 weeks for male and 13-14 weeks for females. The Rabbit was placed under laboratory conditions after healt examinations. Only animals without any visual signs of illness were used for the study.
Air-conditioned with target ranges for room temperature 17-23 °C, relative humidity 30-70% and approximately 10-15 air changes per hour. Room temperature and humidity were monitored continuously and values outside of these ranges may have occasionally occurred, usually following room cleaning. These transient variations are considered not to have any influence on the study and, therefore, these data are not reported but are retained at RCC. The animals were provided with an automatically controlled light cycle of
12 hours light and 12 hours dark. Music was played during the daytime light period.
Individually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers and drinking water bowls. Wood blocks and haysticks 4646 were provided for gnawing. Pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418 rabbit maintenance diet ad libitum. Community tap water, ad libitum. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 500 mg
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours alter the removal of the dressing, gauze patch and test item.
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- Four days before treatment, one flank was clipped with an electric clipper, exposing an area of approximately 100 cm2 (10 cm x 10 cm). The skin of the animals was examined one day before treatment, and regrown fur of all animals was again clipped.
Animals with overt signs of skin injury or marked irritation which may have interfered with the interpretation of the results were not used in the test.
On the day of treatment, 0.5 mL of FEXO-03 was placed on a surgical gauze patch (ca. 4 cm x 4 cm). This gauze patch was applied to the intact skin of the clipped area. The
patch was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing. The dressing was wrapped around the abdomen and anchored with tape.
The duration of treatment was 4 hours. Then the dressing was removed and the skin was flushed with lukewarm tap water to clean the application sile so that any reactions
(erythema) were clearly visible at that time.
The observation has regarded the viability/mortality, the clinical signs and the body weights.
The skin reaction was assessed according to the numerical scoring system listed in the EEC Commission Directive 92/69/EEC, July 31, 1992 approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours alter the removal of the dressing, gauze patch and test item. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- (mean score 1)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- (mean score 2)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- (mean score 3)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- (mean score 1)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- (mean score 2)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- (mean score 3)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal) far each animal for erythema/eschar grades and for oedema grades, separately.
The mean erythema/eschar score and the mean oedema score of the three animals were 0.00.
Very slight erythema was observed in one animai at the 1-hour reading. No swelling (oedema) was noted in any animal at any time.
Neither alterations of the treated skin were observed nor were corrosive effects evident on the skin. - Other effects:
- Coloration : no staining of the treated skin by the test item was observed.
Body weight : within the normal range of variability - Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- FEXO-03 is considered to be "not irritating" to rabbit skin.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was performed in accordance with validated guidelines and in GLP compliance.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The test animals were New Zealand White Rabbit, SPF. The age of the animals at tratment was 12- 13 weeks (male) and 18 - 19 weeks (females).
Air-conditioned with target ranges for room temperature 17-23 °C, relative humidity 30-70% and approximately 10-15 air changes per hour. Room temperature and humidity
were monitored continuously and values outside of these ranges may have occasionally occurred, usually following room cleaning. These transient variations are considered not
to have any influence on the study and, therefore, these data are not reported but are retained at RCC. The animals were provided with an automatically controlled light cycle of 12 hours light and 12 hours dark. Music was played during the daytime light period.
lndividually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers and drinking water bowls. Wood blocks and haysticks 4646 were provided for gnawing.
Pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418 rabbit maintenance diet ad libitum (batch no. 52/03). Results of analysis for contaminants are archived at RCC Ltd.
Community tap water ad libitum. Results of bacteriological, chemical and contaminant analyses are archived at RCC Ltd. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The right eye remained untreated and served as the reference control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 ml (per animal) of FEXO-03 was measured with a syringe and applied undiluted as it was delivered by the sponsor.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- On the day of treatment
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours, as well as 7, 10 and 14 days after instillation.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 (animals of both sexes were used)
- Details on study design:
- 0.1 ml (per animal) of FEXO-03 was measured with a syringe and applied undiluted as it was delivered by the sponsor.
The pH of the test item was measured for a previous study (RCC Study number 851037, skin irritation with FEXO-03 in rabbits) and was found to be 6.
According to Directive 92/69 EEC, B.5. and OECD Guidelines 405, a test item needs not to be tested if the pH-value is less than 2 or greater than 11.5, owing to its predictable corrosive properties.
The eyes of the animals were examined one day prior to test item administration. Animals with overt signs of ocular injury or irritation which may have interfered with the
interpretation of the results were not used in the test.
On the day ol treatment, 0.1 ml of FEXO-03 was placed in the conjunctival sac of the left eye of each animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for about one second to prevent loss ol test item. The right eye remained untreated and served as the reference control. The treated eyes were not rinsed alter instillation.
As the first animal screamed just after the application only this single animal (one male) was treated according to the study plan schedule. As neither a corrosive effect nor a severe irritant effect was observed alter the 1- and 24-hour examinations, the test was completed using the two remaining animals (two females).
OBSERVATIONS
Viability/Mortality - Daily from acclimatization of the animals to the termination of test.
Clinical signs - Daily from acclimatization of the animals to the termination of test.
Body weights - At start of acclimatization, on the day of application and at termination of observation.
The ocular reaction was assessed according to the numerical scoring system listed in the EEC Commission Directive 92/69/EEC, July 31, 1992 at approximately 1, 24, 48 and
72 hours, as well as 7, 10 and 14 days alter instillation.
Eye examinations were made with a Varia Cliptrix diagnostic-lamp. - Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- (mean score 1)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- (mean score 2)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- (mean score 3)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- (mean score 1)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- (mean score 2)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- (mean score 3)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- (mean score 1)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- (mean score 2)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- (mean score 3)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- (mean score 1)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- (mean score 2)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- (mean score 3)
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The mean score was calculated across 3 scoring times (24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation) for each animal for corneal opacity, iris, redness and chemosis of the conjunctivae, separately. The individual mean scores for corneal opacity and iris were 0.00 for all three animals. The individual mean scores for the conjunctivae were 0.67, 1.00 and 1.33 for reddening and 0.00 for chemosis for all three animals.
No abnormal findings were observed in the cornea or iris of any animal at any of the measurement intervals.
Moderate reddening of the conjunctivae was observed in all animals at the 1-hour reading.
Slight to moderate reddening of the conjunctivae was noted in all animals 24 hours after treatment. Slight reddening was present in all animals at the 48-hour reading and persisted in two animals up to 72 hours and in one animal up to 10 days after treatment.
Slight to moderate swelling was present in all animals at the 1-hour reading.
Moderate reddening of the sclerae was observed in all animals at the 1-hour reading and slight reddening was evident in two animals 24 hours after treatment and persisted in one animal up to the 48-hour examination. No ocular discharge was noted in any animal at any time.
No abnormal findings were observed in the treated eye of any animal 14 days after treatment, the end of the observation period for all animals.
No corrosion of the cornea was observed at any of the reading times. - Other effects:
- Coloration : no staining of the treated eyes produced by the test item was observed
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- FEXO-03 is considered to be "not irritating" to the rabbit eye.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
These studies followed procedures indicated by internationally accepted guidelines and recommendations.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
This endpoint is judged as reliable because the test was performed in accordance with validated guidelines.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
This endpoint is judged as reliable because the test was performed in accordance with validated guidelines.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Regulation EC 1272/2008 and to Directive 67/548/EEC, the substance should not be classified for the skin and eye irritation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.