Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6-naphthyl ether
EC Number:
217-049-0
EC Name:
Methyl 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6-naphthyl ether
Cas Number:
1730-48-9
Molecular formula:
C11H14O
IUPAC Name:
6-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
Test item: Methoxy-tetraline
CAS number: 1730-48-9
Batch number: S41214K
Physical state: Liquid
Coluor: Brown
Storage: At a temperature of 15 to 30 °C

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Source: TOXI-COOP ZRT.
Hygienic level at arrival: SPF
Hygienic level during the test: Good conventional
Number of animals: 28 animals/main test (4 animals/treatment group)
Sex: Female, nulliparous, non-pregnant
Age of animals: Young adult mice; 10-11 weeks old (at start of the main test)
Body weight range at starting: 18.2-22.4 g
Acclimatization time: 7 days

Housing during acclimatization period: Grouped caging in small groups
Housing during the test: Grouped caging (4 animals/cage)
Light: 12 hours daily, from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.
Temperature: 22 ± 3 °C
Relative humidity: 30 – 70 %

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Remarks:
AOO (acetone:olive oil, 4:1) for positive control groups
Concentration:
The test item was administered at four different concentrations (100; 50; 25; 10 w/v%) according to the results of the dose range finding test.
Details on study design:
Selection of test item concentrations was based on the results of a formulation evaluation and also results of preliminary irritation/toxicity tests to find an appropriate vehicle and the maximum applicable concentration according to the relevant guidelines. Based on the preliminary test results Methoxy-tetraline (CAS No. 1730-48-9) was tested in the LLNA at concentration of 100 % as the undiluted test item and at 50 %, 25 % and 10 % (w/v) concentrations as formulations in Acetone: Olive oil 4:1 (v/v) mixture (AOO). Appropriate positive control (α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde [HCA] in 25 % (w/v) concentration), furthermore two negative control groups dosed with physiological saline (as naive control group), or with the vehicle of the test and positive control groups, respectively, were employed.
The positive control item (25 % (w/v) HCA in AOO) induced the appropriate stimulation over the control, thus confirming the validity of the assay.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The positive control group animals were treated with 25 % (w/v) HCA solution (dissolved in AOO) concurrent to the test item groups. No mortality, cutaneous reactions or signs of toxicity were observed in the positive control group.
Significant lymphoproliferative response (SI ≥ 3) was noted for HCA (SI = 15.3). The results of the positive control item demonstrated appropriate performance of the test in accordance with the relevant guidelines and confirmed validity of the assay.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Value:
13.4
Remarks on result:
other: Methoxy-tetraline 100% (undiluted)
Parameter:
SI
Value:
3.1
Remarks on result:
other: Methoxy-tetraline 50 % in DMF
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.5
Remarks on result:
other: Methoxy-tetraline  25 % in DMF
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1
Remarks on result:
other: Methoxy-tetraline 10 % in DMF
Parameter:
EC3
Value:
32
Remarks on result:
other: based on regression curve
Parameter:
EC3
Value:
46
Remarks on result:
other: based on dose-response curve

Any other information on results incl. tables

Test Group Name

Measured

DPM/group

Group*

DPM

DPN

(DPM/Node)

Stimulation

Index Values

Naive control: physiological saline

2337

2314.0

289.3

1.0

Vehicle control for the positive control: AOO

12954

12931.1

1616.4

1.0

Positive control:
25 % HCA
in AOO

197314

197291.0

24661.4

15.3

Methoxy-tetraline
100% (
undiluted)

31146

31123.0

3890.4

13.4

Methoxy-tetraline
50 %
in DMF

39761

39738.0

4967.3

3.1

Methoxy-tetraline
 
25 % in DMF

32924

32901.0

4112.6

2.5

Methoxy-tetraline
10 % in DMF

12844

12821.0

1602.6

1.0

*Group DPM = measured DPMgroup- average DPMbackground

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
In conclusion, under the conditions of the present Local Lymph Node Assay, Methoxy-tetraline (CAS No. 1730-48-9) tested at the maximum applicable concentration of 100 % (as the undiluted test item) and at concentrations of 50 %, 25 % and 10 % (w/v) as formulations in an appropriate vehicle (AOO) was shown to have skin sensitization potential. The calculated EC3 values (based on dose-response and regression curve analysis) were 46 % and 32 % (w/v), in this LLNA, respectively. Based on the EC3 values calculated using dose-response and regression curve analysis the test item was considered a weak sensitizer according to the published data.
Using both EC3 values, according to the published data for classification of contact allergens, Methoxy-tetraline (CAS No. 1730-48-9) is ranked among weak sensitizers (10 ≤ EC3 ≤ 100) in this LLNA
According to GHS classification criteria the substance is classified as skin senzitization 1B sub-category.