Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

CJ307 is not classified based on the sensitization result in guinea pigs (OECD TG406).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From January 05, 2016 to November 11, 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
The structure of the read-across substance, EC:300-504-3, is the same as the test substance. Therefore, the human toxicity and environmental toxicity is the same. The only difference is the test substance containing lithium. However, the low level of lithium will not change the classification.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) is already available for the registration outside of EU. Therefore, LLNA is not conducted.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Evercion SR61, Reactive red 3-1, EC: 300-504-3
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Source: WEI XIN HANG
- Weight at study initiation: 330.4-500.0g
- Housing: Every five animals were housed in a stainless steel cage
- Acclimation period: 7 days
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 2 °C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15%
- Photoperiod: 12-hrs dark / 12-hrs light
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
0.1 mL and 0.5 mL of 10% Evercion SR61 for intradermal and epicutaneous, respectively
Day(s)/duration:
Day1 and Day7 for intradermal and epicutaneous, respectively
Adequacy of induction:
non-irritant substance, but skin pre-treated with 10% SDS
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
0.5 mL of 10% Evercion SR61
Day(s)/duration:
Day23
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
For control group: five
For test group: ten
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA)
Positive control results:
The latest results showed that positive control animals had shown skin reactions of 1-2 and the sensitization rate of α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA) was 100%.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.5 mL
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.5 mL
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.5 mL of 10% Evercion SR61
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.5 mL of 10% Evercion SR61
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Table 1. The body weight of the guinea pigs

Group

Sex

Animal ID.

Animal Weight (g)

Weight Change (g)

Day 1

Day 26

Control group

Male

26

379.6

468.0

+88.4

27

388.3

483.2

+94.9

28

404.0

525.0

+121.0

29

330.4

446.0

+115.6

30

415.8

508.6

+92.8

Test group

Male

31

408.2

504.2

+96.0

32

398.2

491.2

+93.0

33

381.0

484.6

+103.6

34

435.6

540.4

+104.8

35

452.0

556.2

+104.2

36

500.0

582.2

+82.2

37

413.8

486.2

+72.4

38

393.0

489.2

+96.2

39

490.6

587.4

+96.8

40

334.6

449.6

+115.0

Table 2. Individual skin reaction of guinea pigs

Group

Sex

Animal ID.

Grade of skin reactiona

Percent of Animals Sensitized

Sensitizing Capacityb

24 ± 1 hrs

48 ± 1 hrs

Control group

Male

26

0

0

0

Weak

27

0

0

28

0

0

29

0

0

30

0

0

Test group

Male

31

0

0

0

Weak

32

0

0

33

0

0

34

0

0

35

0

0

36

0

0

37

0

0

38

0

0

39

0

0

40

0

0

a The skin reaction was grading according to “Magnusson and Kligman scale”.

b The sensitizing capacity of the test article was classified according to the “Scoring system of Kligman”

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
According to OECD 406 test method and “Scoring system of Kligman”, the sensitization rate of Evercion SR61 was 0% and Evercion SR61 caused weak sensitization in guinea pigs. Therefore, Evercion SR61 was not met a category based on GHS criteria.
Executive summary:

This test using the procedures outlined in the SuperLab Study Plan for M62-151100095001EN which is based on the SOP for the OECD 406 (SOPP-339) and OECD 406 (OECD, 1992). The results of this OECD 406 test forEvercion SR61show that test reliability criteria was met.

A 10% Evercion SR61 was used for intradermal injection and occlusively patched, to ten test guinea pigs to induce sensitization.The normal saline was used for similar injection and occlusively patched to five control guinea pigs. Following a recovery period, animals received a challenge patch with 10% Evercion SR61.The skin sensitization reactions were scored at approximately 24 and 48 hours after patch removal. At the end of study, body weight increase was observed in all animals. During 48 hours after challenge exposure, 0% treated animals showed sensitization to the Evercion SR61. Under the conditions of this study, Evercion SR61 did not caused any sensitization in guinea pigs.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

Skin sensitization

CJ307 is not classified as skin sensitizer. The result is read-across from Evercion SR61 due to the similar structure. The test detail of Evercion SR61 is described below.

A 10% Evercion SR61 was used for intradermal injection and occlusively patched, to ten test guinea pigs to induce sensitization. The normal saline was used for similar injection and occlusively patched to five control guinea pigs. Following a recovery period, animals received a challenge patch with 10% Evercion SR61. The skin sensitization reactions were scored at approximately 24 and 48 hours after patch removal. At the end of study, body weight increase was observed in all animals. During 48 hours after challenge exposure, 0% treated animals showed sensitization to the Evercion SR61. Under the conditions of this study, Evercion SR61 did not caused any sensitization in guinea pigs.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification