Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
other distribution data
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: study documented in sufficient details

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1970

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Acrolein was injected into an irrigation canal for a continuous period and the concentration of the test compound in the air above the water surface was measured using GC/UV.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
volatility
Media:
water - air

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Acrylaldehyde
EC Number:
203-453-4
EC Name:
Acrylaldehyde
Cas Number:
107-02-8
Molecular formula:
C3H4O
IUPAC Name:
acrylaldehyde

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

Acrolein (ca. 0.7 ppm) was injected into an irrigation canal (10 -11°C during the day, 6°C during the night; flow velocity: 1.7 ft/sec) for a continuous period (6 h, 20 min) and the concentration of the test compound in the air above the water surface was measured at four sites (1, 3, 6, and 9.5 miles below point of application) using GC/UV. For this, a small, steady stream of air was drawn for two hours through volatilimeters across an enclosed water surface of known area, and bubbled through a solution containing 2,4 -DNPH-hydrazine.

The following results were obtained:

Acrolein losses by volatilization from canal surfaces

Distance below injection point (mile(s))

Acrolein volatilised per surface mile of canal (mg/h)

Percent of acrolein volatilised per mile

1 mile

27.0 mg/h

0.31%

3 mile

20.7 mg/h

0.35%

6 mile

15.2 mg/h

0.17%

9.5 mile

11.5 mg/h

0.13%

Acrolein residual solution concentrations and calculated losses from point of application

Miles below injection point

Acrolein concentration (ppm)*

Acrolein loss per mile %

Acrolein losses summation %

1

0.710

1.4

1.4

3

0.691

1.3

4.0

6

0.590

4.7

18.1

9.5

0.404

7.4

43.9

12.5

0.361

2.0

49.9

16.0

0.340

0.8

52.8

19.0

0.329

0.5

54.3

22.5

0.319

0.4

55.7

27.0

0.269

1.5

62.6

*average of three samples taken 1, 3, and 5 h after acrolein front reached sampling station

Based on the results of water and air concentration measurements (only small losses due to volatilization), the authors concluded that reaction of acrolein with suspended or sedimented particulates might be of considerable importance.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Acrolein (ca. 0.7 ppm) was injected into an irrigation canal (10 -11°C during the day, 6°C during the night; flow velocity: 1.7 ft/sec) for a continuous period (6 h, 20 min) and the concentration of the test compound in the air above the water surface was measured at four sites (1, 3, 6, and 9.5 miles below point of application) using GC/UV. For this, a small, steady stream of air was drawn for two hours through volatilimeters across an enclosed water surface of known area, and bubbled through a solution containing 2,4 -DNPH-hydrazine. Based on the results of water and air concentration measurements (only small losses due to volatilization: 0.13-0.35% of applied acrolein), the authors concluded that reaction of acrolein with suspended or sedimented particulates might be of considerable importance.
Executive summary:

Acrolein (ca. 0.7 ppm) was injected into an irrigation canal (10 -11°C during the day, 6°C during the night; flow velocity: 1.7 ft/sec) for a continuous period (6 h, 20 min) and the concentration of the test compound in the air above the water surface was measured at four sites (1, 3, 6, and 9.5 miles below point of application) using GC/UV. For this, a small, steady stream of air was drawn for two hours through volatilimeters across an enclosed water surface of known area, and bubbled through a solution containing 2,4 -DNPH-hydrazine.

The following results were obtained:

Acrolein losses by volatilization from canal surfaces

Distance below injection point (mile(s))

Acrolein volatilised per surface mile of canal (mg/h)

Percent of acrolein volatilised per mile

1

27.0

0.31

3

20.7

0.35

6

15.2

0.17

9.5

11.5

0.13

Acrolein residual solution concentrations and calculated losses from point of application

Miles below injection point

Acrolein concentration (ppm)*

Acrolein loss per mile %

Acrolein losses summation %

1

0.710

1.4

1.4

3

0.691

1.3

4.0

6

0.590

4.7

18.1

9.5

0.404

7.4

43.9

12.5

0.361

2.0

49.9

16.0

0.340

0.8

52.8

19.0

0.329

0.5

54.3

22.5

0.319

0.4

55.7

27.0

0.269

1.5

62.6

*average of three samples taken 1, 3, and 5 h after acrolein front reached sampling station

Based on the results of water and air concentration measurements (only small losses due to volatilization), the authors concluded that reaction of acrolein with suspended or sedimented particulates might be of considerable importance