Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 406-940-1 | CAS number: 126019-82-7 DP 211
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
The substance and its constituents do not accumulate in organisms.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The bioaccumulative potential of the substance was assessed in a weight of evidence approach including experimental data, several QSAR estimations and data on the molecular size and log Kow. The substance is an UVCB, therefore 5 probable structures were assessd by QSAR. The single results are summarized in the table below.
Overview on BCF Results
Model |
Structure 1 |
Within AD
|
Structure 2 |
Within AD |
Structure 3 |
Within AD |
Structure 4 |
Within AD |
Structure 5 |
Within AD |
Catalogic |
7.41 |
yes |
7.41 |
yes |
7.41 |
yes |
7.41 |
yes |
7.41 |
yes |
BCFBAF (EpiSuite) |
3.2 |
no |
3.2 |
no |
3.2 |
no |
3.2 |
no |
3.2 |
no |
Caesar (Vega) |
7.0 |
no |
5.0 |
no |
5.0 |
no |
8.0 |
no |
2.0 |
|
Meylan (Vega) |
3.0 |
no |
3.0 |
no |
3.0 |
no |
3.0 |
no |
3.0 |
no |
KNN/Read-Across (Vega) |
102.3 |
could be outside |
102.3 |
could be outside |
102.3 |
could be outside |
89.1 |
could be outside |
102.3 |
could be outside |
T.E.S.T |
586.5 |
yes |
757.6 |
yes |
761.2 |
yes |
2322.5 |
yes |
66.9 |
yes |
|
||||||||||
Bioaccumulation study with carp, Mitsubishi, 3B567G, 1994 |
BCF: 48 Remarks: 0.5 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L, vehicle |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Overall conclusion |
BCF < 500 |
BCF < 500 |
BCF < 500 |
BCF < 500 |
BCF < 500 |
In a guideline study conducted according to OECD 305 C carp were exposed to the substance in a flow-through system. Two substance concentrations were tested (0.5 mg/L and 0.05 mg/L). The solubility of the test substance was enhanced by addition of a solubiliser.
Based on whole body weight of fish a BCF of 48 was determined (Ciba-Geigy, 1994), demonstrating that the substance is not bioaccumulative.
QSAR model calculation for the 5 probable structures support the findings in the BCF study.
The BCF base-line model integrated in Catalogic is a sophisticated model which takes into account different mitigating factors, i.e. acids, metabolism, phenols, size and water solubility. The five structures were inside the parametric and the mechanistic domains of the compound with 82% of the fragments of the target chemical being present in correctly predicted training chemicals. Nevertheless, the result is regarded as reliable and suitable to be used in a weight of evidence approach together with the in vivo results. With mitigating factors applied the BCF is determined as 7.41 for all five structures. The only influence on the bioaccumulative potential has the water solubility. Furthermore, even without considering any mitigating factors the BCFmax is only at 9.14 L/kg.
US EPA’s Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (T.E.S.T.) uses five submodels to estimate the BCF of the target chemical. These results are than averaged in the consensus approach to provide a higher reliability. With the exception of the Single Model, the target compound is inside of the applicability domain of the single submodels. However, the confidence in the estimated BCF values of the Single submodels is not optimal. The consensus model predicts the BCF by calculating the average of the predicted BCF values from the other QSAR methodologies while taking the applicability domain of the models into account. This method typically provides the highest prediction accuracy since errant predictions are dampened by the predictions from the other methods. In addition this method provides the highest prediction coverage because several methods with slightly different applicability domains are used to make a prediction. The averaged result of the consensus method was a BCF in the range of 66.9 to 2322.5.
US EPA’s EPISuite includes the regression-based estimation and the Arnot-Gobas model which takes biotransformation processes into account. The five structures of the substance are within the molecular weight range but outside the log Kow range of both the regression-based estimation and the Arnot-Gobas model. The regression-based model predicted a BCF of 3.2 L/kg. The Arnot-Gobas model predicted BCF value of 0.9 L/kg for the upper trophic level including biotransformation rate estimates and biotransformation rates of zero. The EPISuite results were regarded as suitable in the weight of evidence approach.
The VEGA package includes three different estimations tools with each of them providing detailed information on the applicability domain. Although the substance was out of the applicability domain of the models the results fit to the results of the other models and the experimental study. Therefore, the results were taken into account in the weight of evidence approach. The BCF was estimated to be in the range of 2.0 to 102.3 L/kg.
According to ECHA’s Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment chapter R.11 – PBT Assessment, compounds with an average maximum diameter of >1.7 nm together with molecular weight of greater than 1100 are unlikely to have a BCF of >2000. Although the five probable structures of the UVCB substance has a molecular weight of only 721 the DiamMax-average ranges between 21.448 and 26.875 Angstrom and even the DiamMax-Min ranges between 17.799 and 20.716 Angstrom for all five structures.
Furthermore, the aquatic BCF of a substance is probably lower than 2000 if the calculated logKow is higher than 10. The present compound has a calculated logKow of > 19.
In conclusion, using all available data in a weight of evidence approach, the compound has only a low bioaccumulative potential (BCF < 500).
Evaluation of minor constituents:
It can be concluded that also the minor constituents do not fullfil the B or vB criteria. Catalogic calculations with structure 6 are partially out of the domain of the model but the molecular size the molecular size is in the same range as structures 1 to 5 and therefore unlikely to cross biological membranes. Both constituents are therefore not relevant for the PBT assessment and not further assessed.
The substance and its constituents do not fullfill the criteria for bioaccumulative or very bioaccumulative according to REACH.
Model | Structure 6 | Within AD | Structure 7 | Within AD |
Catalogic | 7.41 | no | 446.7 | yes |
DiamMax-Average | 24.730 | yes | 13.897 | yes |
Overall conclusion | BCF < 500 | BCF < 500 |
QSAR-disclaimer
In Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, it is laid down that information on intrinsic properties of substances may be generated by means other than tests, provided that the conditions set out in Annex XI (of the same Regulation) are met. Furthermore according to Article 25 of the same Regulation testing on vertebrate animals shall be undertaken only as a last resort.
According to Annex XI of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (Q)SAR results can be used if (1) the scientific validity of the (Q)SAR model has been established, (2) the substance falls within the applicability domain of the (Q)SAR model, (3) the results are adequate for the purpose of classification and labeling and/or risk assessment and (4) adequate and reliable documentation of the applied method is provided.
For the assessment of the substance (Q)SAR results were used for aquatic bioaccumulation.The criteria listed in Annex XI of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 are considered to be adequately fulfilled and therefore the endpoint(s) sufficiently covered and suitable for risk assessment.
Therefore, and for reasons of animal welfare, further experimental studies on aquatic bioaccumulation are not provided.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.