Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
10.07.2006-17.08.2006
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study, GLP conform.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2006
Report date:
2006

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Groupe interministeriel des produits chimiques
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Silicic acid, titanium salt
EC Number:
255-911-8
EC Name:
Silicic acid, titanium salt
Cas Number:
42613-21-8
IUPAC Name:
titanium(2+) oxosilanediolate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Magnapore 963 (Silicic acid, titanium salt)
- Substance type: black powder
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: 98 %
- Lot/batch No.: lot 405; produced 01.03.2006
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 01.09.2007
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- Additive: chromium (III) hydroxide, CAS No. 1308-14-1

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Centre de production Animale (F-45160)
- Weight at study initiation: 366-554 g
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-25
- Humidity (%): 43-70

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: olive oil and paraffin oil
Concentration / amount:
The induction phase was performed by intradermal injection at day 0 with the test item at 0.78 % and by topical application at day 8 with test item at 12.5 % 24 hours after brushing with a solution of sodium lauryl sulfate.
In the challenge phase the test item has been used diluted at 12.5 % and at 6.25 % in paraffin oil.
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: olive oil and paraffin oil
Concentration / amount:
The induction phase was performed by intradermal injection at day 0 with the test item at 0.78 % and by topical application at day 8 with test item at 12.5 % 24 hours after brushing with a solution of sodium lauryl sulfate.
In the challenge phase the test item has been used diluted at 12.5 % and at 6.25 % in paraffin oil.
No. of animals per dose:
Group 1 (negative control): 3 females, 2 males
Group 2 (treated): 4 males, 6 females
Details on study design:
INDUCTION EXPOSURE (Group 2)
17 July 2006: first induction
- 2 intradermal injections of the test item at 0.78 %
- 2 intradermal injections of Freund´s Complete Adjuvant diluted at 50 % in a physiological saline solution
- 2 intradermal injections of a mixture with equal volumes - Freund´s Complete Adjuvant at 50 % and the test item at 1.56 %
Weighing of animals
25 July 2006: second induction
- topical application, on the same zone, with the test item at 12.5 %, 24 hours after brushing with 0.5 mL of a solution of Sodium lauryl sulfate at 10 %

REST PHASE (Group 2)
28. July -13 August 2006 (17 days)

CHALLENGE EXPOSURE (Groups 1 and 2)
14 August 2006: topical application under occlusive dressing at the following concentrations: 12.5 % and 6.25 %
16 August 2006: 24 hour reading time
17 August 2006: 48 hour reading time and weighing
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
12.5
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
14
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 12.5. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 14.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
6.25
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
14
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 6.25. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 14.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
12.5
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
14
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 12.5. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 14.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
6.25
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
14
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 6.25. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 14.0. Clinical observations: none.

Any other information on results incl. tables

No macroscopic cutaneous reactions attributable to allergy were recorded during the examination following the removal of the occlusive dressing from the animals of the treated group with the test item. No cutaneous intolerance reaction was recorded in animals from the negative control groups.

It was noted one death of an animal in the negative control group.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information