Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-761-9 | CAS number: 6711-48-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Data generated with the related substances DMAPA and DEAPA is used for endpoint coverage.
In a key, reliable study, DMAPA was administered to rats for a period of up to 56 consecutive days at dose levels up to 200 mg/kg bw/day, in a screening test for reproduction/developmental toxicity performed according to OECD guideline 421 (BASF, 1999). The NOAEL for systemic toxicity was established at 50 mg/kg bw/day, for reproductive toxicity at 200 mg/kg bw/day.
An extended one-generation reproductive toxicity sutdy with DEAPA is currently ongoing. Data will be considered when available.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- extended one-generation reproductive toxicity – with F2 generation and both developmental neuro- and immunotoxicity (Cohorts 1A, 1B with extension, 2A, 2B, and 3)
- Type of information:
- experimental study planned (based on read-across)
- Justification for type of information:
- An extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study with the related substance DEAPA is currently ongoing (ECHA decision number CCH-D-2114457570-49-01/F). The data of this study will be included in the test substance dossier when available.
Read-across hypothesis:
The rationale for the read-across is based on the “analogue approach” described in described in ECHA’s (2017) Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF). This read-across is based on the hypothesis that the source and the target substances have similar toxicological and ecotoxicological properties because they are structurally closely related and have similar general mechanistic properties. This prediction is supported by the existing experimental data available on the substances themselves which confirm their similar physicochemical and (eco)toxicological characteristics. In this case, an ‘analogue approach’ has been chosen as the data from the analogue DEAPA will be used to fulfill the information requirement. Scenario 2 of the RAAF guidance is selected.
The full read-across justification document for this endpoint will be included when the study becomes available. - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 443 (Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study)
- Justification for study design:
- SPECIFICATION OF STUDY DESIGN FOR EXTENDED ONE-GENERATION REPRODUCTION TOXICITY STUDY WITH JUSTIFICATIONS:
Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study OECD TG 443 in rats, oral route with the read across source substance as specified in the decision number CCH-D-2 1 1 4457 57 O-49-OU F:
At least two weeks premating exposure duration for the parental (PO)
generation;
- Dose level setting shall aim to induce systemic toxicity at the highest
dose level;
- Cohort 1A (Reproductive toxicity);
- Cohort 18 (Reproductive toxicity) with extension to mate the Cohort 18
animals to produce the F2 generation;
- Cohorts 2A and 28 (Developmental neurotoxicity); and
- Cohort 3 (Developmental immunotoxicity).
The rationale for the study design are included in the above mentioned decision and further details on the study design will be included at a later date with the full study summary - Species:
- rat
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- read-across from related substance
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from the related substance DMAPA is used to cover this endpoint. Justification for the read-across approach is included in section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- reproductive toxicity
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
- other: fertility
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic toxicity
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- No reliable screening for reproductive/developmental toxicity study with the test substance is available. Data generated with the related substance DMAPA is used for endpoint coverage.
Under the conditions of the study, the oral administration of DMAPA by gavage to rats had no adverse effects on reproductive performance or fertility of the F0 parental animals of all substance-treated groups. Signs of general, systemic toxicity in the F0 parental animals were confined to the male rats of the 200 mg/kg bw/day group.
NOAEL reproductive performance and fertility = 200 mg/kg bw/day (male/female),
NOAEL developmental toxicity = 200 mg/kg bw/day (male/female),
NOAEL systemic toxicity = 50 mg/kg bw/day (male).
The same is assumed to be correct for the test substance.
Referenceopen allclose all
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- GLP-compliant, according to OECD guideline
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Data generated with the related substances DMAPA and DEAPA is used for endpoint coverage. Justification of the read-across approach is included in section 13.
Screening study (OECD421)
A Reproduction/Development Toxicity Screening Test of the related substance DMAPA by oral administration to Sprague-Dawley Rats according OECD method 421 was carried out with four groups of 10 male and 10 female rats each. The rats received 0 (control), 10, 50 or 200 mg/kg bw/day; males: 14 days prior to mating and during the 14-day mating period, females: 14 days prior to mating and during the mating period, pregnancy and lactation period. Examinations were carried out on mortality, clinical signs, body weight, food consumption, reproduction, macroscopic post mortem findings/organ weights of parent animals and histopathology.
Under the conditions of the above-mentioned study, the oral administration of DMAPA by gavage to rats had no adverse effects on reproductive performance or fertility of the F0 parenteral animals of all substance-treated groups. Mating behavior, conception, gestation, parturition and lactation as well as the sexual organ weights, gross and histopathological findings of these organs were similar between the treated animals and the controls. With the exception of one male F0 and one female F0 in the control group and in the mid-dose group, all F0 rats proved to be fertile. Thus, the observable difference was regarded to be incidental in nature and not of toxicological or biological relevance.
Signs of general, systemic toxicity in the F0 animals were confined to the male rats of the 200 mg/kg bw/day group. Toxicity was characterized by decreased food consumption. No compound-related adverse effects were observed in female rats up to the highest dose level of 200 mg/kg bw/day. There were no signs of developmental toxicity in the progeny of the F0 parents up to and including the high dose group (200 mg/kg bw/day). Observed differences did not show any biological relevance between the substance-treated groups and the control group. Thus, the NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) for reproductive performance and fertility was 200 mg/kg bw/day for the F0 parental rats. The NOAEL for general, systemic toxicity of the test substance was 200 mg/kg bw/day for the F0 parental females, while it was 50 mg/kg bw/day for the F0 parental males. The NOAEL for developmental toxicity could be fixed at 200 mg/kg bw/day for the F1 progeny. The same is assumed to be correct for the test substance.
Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (OECD 443)
An EOGRTS according to guideline 443 is currently ongoing with DEAPA. Data will be considered when available.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Data generated with the related substance DEAPA is used for endpoint coverage.
In a key PNDT study in rat, the NOAEL for maternal parameters was considered to be 50 mg/kg bw/day based on clinical signs, food consumption, body weight, net body weight change and/or gravid uterus weight from 250 mg/kg bw/day and mortality at 750 mg/kg bw/day. THe NOAEL for embryo-fetal toxicity and teratogenicity was considered to be 50 and 250 mg/kg bw/day, respectively (in a context of marked to severe maternal toxicity).
In a key PNDT study in rabbit, the NOEL for maternal parameters was considered to be 15 mg/kg bw/day, based on the absence of any test item-related findings at this dose level. The NOAEL was considered to be 130 mg/kg bw/day, based on the transient and statistically significant but non adverse lower mean body weight gain and food consumption at this dose level. The NOAEL for embryo-fetal development was considered to be 130 mg/kg bw/day, based on the absence of adverse effects at this dose level.
The same is assumed to be correct for the test substance.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from the related substance DEAPA is used to cover this endpoint. Justification for the read-across approach is included in section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- General toxicity
- Effect level:
- 130 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Based on absence of adverse effects
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 130 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Based on absence of adverse effects
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- No reliable developmental toxicity study was performed with the test substance. Data generated with the related substance DEAPA is used for endpoint coverage.
In a preliminary study in rabbits, it was established that the high dose level in the main study (study 47474 RSL) should be between 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day.
In the key prenatal developmental toxicity study in rabbits (OECD guideline 414), the NOEL for maternal parameters was considered to be 15 mg/kg bw/day, based on the absence of any test item-related findings at this dose level. The NOAEL was considered to be 130 mg/kg bw/day, based on the transient and statistically significant but non adverse lower mean body weight gain and food consumption at this dose level. The NOAEL for embryo-fetal development was considered to be 130 mg/kg bw/day, based on the absence of adverse effects at this dose level.
The same is assumed to be correct for the test substance. - Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- read-across from related substance
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from the related substance DEAPA is used to cover this endpoint. Justification for the read-across approach is included in section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical signs
- early or late resorptions
- food consumption and compound intake
- mortality
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- pre and post implantation loss
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Localisation:
- uterus
- Description (incidence and severity):
- lower mean gravid uterus - weight
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reduction in number of live offspring
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- changes in litter size and weights
- other: post-implantation losses
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- external malformations
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Localisation:
- other: not specified
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- developmental effects as a secondary non-specific consequence of maternal toxicity effects
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- No reliable developmental toxicity study was performed with the test substance. Data generated with the related substance DEAPA is used for endpoint coverage.
In a preliminary study in rats, 750 mg/kg bw/day was established as suitable high dose-level for the main study phase.
In the key prenatal developmental toxicity study in rats (OECD guideline 414), the NOAEL for maternal parameters was considered to be 50 mg/kg bw/day based on clinical signs, food consumption, body weight, net body weight change and/or gravid uterus weight from 250 mg/kg bw/day and mortality at 750 mg/kg bw/day. The NOAEL for embryo-fetal toxicity and teratogenicity was considered to be 50 and 250 mg/kg bw/day, respectively (in a context of marked (250 mg/kg bw/day) to severe (750 mg/kg bw/day) maternal toxicity).
Referenceopen allclose all
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- GLP-compliant, according to OECD guideline
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
- the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for maternal parameters was considered to be
15 mg/kg bw/day, based on the absence of any test item-related findings at this dose level and the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 130 mg/kg bw/day, based on the transient and statistically significant but non adverse lower mean body weight gain and food consumption at this dose level, - the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for embryo-fetal development was considered to be 130 mg/kg bw/day, based on the absence of adverse effects at this dose level.
No developmental toxicity/teratogenicity study with the test substance was performed. Data generated with the related substance DEAPA is used for endpoint coverage. Justification of the read-across approach is included in section 13.
Prenatal developmental toxicity study in rat
Preliminary study: The potential toxic effects of the test item, DEAPA, on the pregnant female and on embryonic and fetal development was evaluated in a range-finding study following daily oral administration (gavage) to pregnant female rats from implantation to the day prior to the scheduled hysterectomy (Day 6 to Day 20 post-coitum inclusive), in order to select dose-levels for a further main study. Three groups of eight time-mated female Sprague-Dawley rats were given the test item at 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day by oral gavage once daily from Days 6 to 20 p.c.. Another group of eight time-mated rats received the vehicle,drinking water treated by reverse osmosis,under the same experimental conditions and acted as a control. All animals were checked daily for mortality and clinical signs. Body weight and food consumption were recorded regularly. After sacrifice, a macroscopic post-mortem examination was performed on the females on Day 21 p.c.. Hysterectomy was performed and the numbers and distribution of corpora lutea, implantation sites, early and late resorptions, uterine scars, and live and dead fetuses were recorded. The fetuses were sexed, weighed and examined for oral cavity and external abnormalities.
On Day 21 p.c., all control females and females given 100 or 300 mg/kg/day and 6/8 females given 1000 mg/kg/day were pregnant with live concepti. Unscheduled mortality occurred in 1/8 females at 1000 mg/kg/day. At final sacrifice, transient ptyalism was observed in all females given 1000 mg/kg/day associated with piloerection in 1/7 females. Reflux at dosing was noted on rare occasions in 2/8 and 1/7 females given the test item at 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively.
A body weight loss was observed in females given 1000 mg/kg/day at the beginning of the treatment period (-13 g) whereas slight lower body weight gain was recorded in females given 300 mg/kg/day (+9 g vs. +13 g in controls); this was followed with lower body weight gain until Day 15p.c.at 1000 mg/kg/day leading to a statistically significantly lower body weight gain throughout the whole study period (+105 g vs. +140 g in controls). Body weight gain of females given 300 mg/kg/day returned to control values from Day 9 p.c..
These differences were accompanied with reduced food consumption (-11% at 300 mg/kg/day over the first 3 days of the treatment period and -13 to -52% at 1000 mg/kg/day between Days 6 and 15 p.c., compared to controls).
There were no effects of treatment with the test item at 100 mg/kg/day.
At necropsy on terminal sacrifice,there were no test item-related gross findings.
When compared with the control group, dams given 1000 mg/kg/day had a lower gravid uterus weight observed in high-dose dams (-9% compared to controls). Lower net weight change (+16 g vs. +41 g in controls) was considered to be a consequence of the lower body weight gain in these females.
Gestation parameters were not impacted by the test item treatment at any dose-levels.
There was no effect on the fetal body weight and on the percentage of male fetuses (sex ratio).
There were no treatment-related fetal external malformations or variations in any groups.
The test item was administered by gavage once daily from Days 6 to 20 p.c., inclusive, to pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats at the dose-levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day. The control group received the vehicle, drinking water treated by reverse osmosis, under the same experimental conditions.
The dose-level of 1000 mg/kg/day was associated with one death and therefore considered to exceed the Maximum Tolerated Dose. Treatment-related effects were also observed (i.e. ptyalism, piloerection and reflux at dosing, marked body weight loss followed by slight body weight gain associated with reduced food consumption resulted in lower net weight change).
The dose-level of 300 mg/kg/day was associated with isolated reflux at dosing and moderate effects at initiation of the study (i.e. moderate body weight gain associated with reduced food consumption). The dose-level of 100 mg/kg/day was not associated with any test item effects.
Based on these findings, 750 mg/kg/day could be considered as a suitable high dose-level for the main embryo-fetal developmental study with the test item.
Main study:
The potential toxic effects of the test item, DEAPA, on the pregnant female and on embryonic and fetal development was evaluated following daily oral administration (gavage) to pregnant female rats from implantation until the day before scheduled hysterectomy [Day 6 to Day 20 post-coitum (p.c.) inclusive]. This GLP study was carried out according to OECD test guideline No. 414 (22 January 2001). Three groups of 24 time-mated female Sprague-Dawley rats received the test item, DEAPA (as pH-neutralized dose formulations), by the oral route (gavage), at dose-levels of 50, 250 or 750 mg/kg/day, once daily from Day 6 until Day 20 p.c.. Another group of 24 time-mated rats received the vehicle only,drinking water treated by reverse osmosis, under the same experimental conditions and acted as a control group. A constant dosage volume of 5 mL/kg/day was used. The test item concentrations in the dose formulations were determined. The animals were checked daily for mortality and clinical signs. Body weight and food consumption were recorded at designated intervals. On Day 21 p.c., the females were sacrificed and submitted to a macroscopic post-mortem examination. Hysterectomy was performed and the numbers of corpora lutea, implantation sites, uterine scars, early and late resorptions, and live and dead fetuses were recorded. The fetuses were weighed, sexed and examined for external, soft tissue and skeletal abnormalities (including cartilage). The stomach of all dams was sampled andpreserved in 10% buffered formalin.
The concentrations of the test item in the dose formulations (-1% to +4%) remained within the acceptable range of variations (± 10%) when compared to the nominal concentrations. At study termination on Day 21p.c., there were 24, 21, 23 and 18 females with live fetuses in the groups given 0, 50, 250 or 750 mg/kg/day, respectively. On Day 20p.c., one pregnant female at 750 mg/kg/day was found dead. From 250 mg/kg/day, ptyalism, sneezing, chromorhinorrhea and/or dacryhorrheawere considered to be test item treatment-related but of minor toxicological importance. At 250 and 750 mg/kg/day, 4/24 and 19/23 dams, respectively, showed clinical signs (round back, emaciated appearance, piloerection, loud breathing and/or reddish vaginal discharge) which were considered to be test item treatment-related and adverse at 750 mg/kg/day. An adverse body weight loss was observed in females given 750 mg/kg/day at the beginning of the treatment period (-16 g on Day 6- 9 p.c., p<0.001), which resulted in a lower body weight gain until the end of the treatment period (+97 g vs.+149 g in controls, during the period of Days 6 to 21 p.c. p<0.001). Body weight gain was slightly lower in females given 250 mg/kg/day (+5 g vs. +15 g in controls, on Days 6 to 9 p.c., p<0.01), but returned towards control values from Day 9 p.c.. Therefore, toxicologically significant effects were observed on terminal body weight in females given 750 mg/kg/day (-12% versus controls on Day 21 p.c., p<0.001). Body weight changes correlated with lower mean food consumption (21% vs. controls between Days 6 and 9 p.c. at 250 mg/kg/day, and -9 to -63% vs. controls between Days 6 and 18 p.c. at 750 mg/kg/day). These findings were considered to be adverse at 750 mg/kg/day. Spleen enlargement, raised focus on the spleen and colored focus on the stomach wall were observed only in females given the high dose-level. Therefore, a relationship to the test item treatment cannot be excluded. At 750 mg/kg/day, statistically significantly lower mean net weight change (+8.5 g vs. +42.0 in controls, p<0.001) and lower carcass weight (-10% vs. controls, p<0.001) were noted. At 250 and 750 mg/kg/day, mean gravid uterus weights were 9% and 18% lower than controls, respectively. This correlated with a lower mean number of live fetuses at both dose levels (11.4 and 11.2 vs. 13.2 in Historical Control Data (HCD), respectively) and with a lower mean fetal body weight at 750 mg/kg/day. At 250 and 750 mg/kg/day, total resorption in one female at each dose level and higher mean post-implantation loss (15.5 and 20.0 vs. 3.8 in HCD, respectively) were also observed. At 750 mg/kg/day, higher mean number of early resorptions (2.1 vs. 0.6 in controls, p<0.001) was noted, as along with lower mean net weight change and lower carcass weight.
All these findings were considered to represent embryo toxicity from 250 mg/kg/day.
At 750 mg/kg/day and when compared with controls, the lower mean fetal body weights were statistically significant (p<0.05). This finding, which was considered to be of minor toxicological importance, was not of a similar amplitude in both sexes as differences were mainly due to the lower body weight of male fetuses (p<0.05). The sex ratio was unaffected by the test item treatment at any dose-level. There were no test item treatment-related variations at external/oral cavity examination of the fetuses. At 750 mg/kg/day, two fetuses, from two different litters had anasarca, cleft palate, short trunk, short tail and/or anal atresia together with acaudia, for which a relationship to the test item treatment could not be ruled out. There were no test item-related variations and malformations at soft tissue examination. At 750 mg/kg/day and when compared with controls, there were higher litter and fetal incidences of fetuses with incomplete ossification of cervical vertebra(e) centrum). From 250 mg/kg/day and taking into account the percentage of litter with fetuses of abnormalities of the axial skeleton, a test-item treatment related effect cannot be excluded.
On the basis of the results obtained in this study:
. the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for maternal parameters was considered to be 50 mg/kg/day (based on clinical signs, food consumption, body weight, net body weight change and/or gravid uterus weight from 250 mg/kg/day and mortality at 750 mg/kg/day),
. the NOAEL for embryo-fetal toxicity and teratogenicity was considered to be 50 and 250 mg/kg/day, respectively (in a context of marked (250 mg/kg/day) to severe (750 mg/kg/day) maternal toxicity).
Prenatal developmental toxicity study in rabbit
preliminary study: The objective of this preliminary study was to evaluate the potential toxic effects of the test item, DEAPA (as pH-neutralized dose formulations), on the pregnant female and on embryonic and fetal developments, following daily oral administration (gavage) to pregnant female rabbits from implantation to the day before scheduled hysterectomy [Day 6 to Day 28 post-coitum (p.c.) inclusive], in order to select dose levels for a further main study (study plan No. 47474 RSL).Three groups of eight timed-mated female New-Zealand White rabbits received the test item, DEAPA, as pH-neutralized dose formulations), by the oral route (gavage), once daily from Day 6 until Day 28 p.c., at dose levels of 100, 300 or 750 mg/kg/day. Another group of eight time-mated rabbits received the vehicle only, drinking water treated by reverse osmosis, under the same experimental conditions and acted as a control group. A constant dosage volume of 4 mL/kg/day was used. All animals were checked daily for mortality and clinical signs. Body weight and food consumption were recorded at designated intervals. On Day 29 p.c., the surviving females were euthanized and a macroscopic post-mortem examination was performed. Hysterectomies were performed and the numbers of corpora lutea, implantation sites, early and late resorptions, and live and dead fetuses were recorded. The fetuses were weighed and examined for external abnormalities. All fetuses were then discarded.
At hysterectomy, on Day 29 p.c., all surviving females were pregnant with live fetuses at termination.
At 300 and 750 mg/kg/day, 4/8 and 8/8 females were prematurely euthanized for ethical reasons between Days 15 and 23 p.c. and between Days 10 and 12 p.c., respectively. Prior to euthanasia, signs of poor clinical condition were observed (i.e. soft feces or absence of feces, soiled urogenital area, emaciated appearance, coldness to the touch, ventral decubitus, hypotonia, body weight loss and/or almost no food intake). The cause of these signs was probably related to gastrointestinal changes. No mortality was observed at 100 mg/kg/day. No test item-related clinical signs were reported in the 4/8 surviving females at 300 mg/kg/day or in females at 100 mg/kg/day. At 300 mg/kg/day, severe reduction in food intake (down to -82% vs. controls) was noted between Days 6 and 15 p.c. (p<0.01 or p<0.001) followed with a low food consumption in surviving females until the end of the treatment period (down to -54%). This correlated with body weight loss (-193 g in cumulative; p<0.05 or p<0.001) and low body weight gain the same intervals, leading to a low body weight gain over the treatment period (+70 g vs. +405 g in controls; p<0.01). Body weight was slightly affected from Day 12 p.c. (down to -10% vs. controls). At 100 mg/kg/day, no effects on body weight or food consumption were noted although a low body weight gain was observed over the whole treatment period (+298 g vs. +405 g in controls).
Test item-related macroscopic observations were noted at ≥ 100 mg/kg/day in the stomach, at ≥ 300 mg/kg/day in the kidneys and at 750 mg/kg/day in the intestines and liver.
At 300 and 100 mg/kg/day, low net body weight changes (-393.3 and -269.2 g vs. -187.2 g in controls, respectively) was noted. At 300 mg/kg/day, low gravid uterus weight (-22% vs. controls) and fetal weight (-11% vs. controls) were observed.
There were no effects on hysterectomy data at 100 or 300 mg/kg/day and no effects on fetal body weight at 100 mg/kg/day. At 300 mg/kg/day, when compared with controls and/or Historical Control Data, mean fetal body weight was lower (-11% vs. controls). This finding was attributed to the test item treatment
and correlated with the lower mean gravid uterus weight recorded at this dose level.
There were no external variations or malformations at fetal examination in the 100 and 300 mg/kg/day groups.
The test item, DEAPA (as pH-neutralized dose formulations), was administered from gestation Day 6 to Day 28 p.c. inclusive, at dose levels of 100, 300 or 750 mg/kg/day, by the oral route (gavage), to time-mated female New-Zealand White rabbits.
At 300 and 750 mg/kg/day, there was overt maternal toxicity, with excessively reduced food consumption leading to body weight loss and poor clinical condition. All females at 750 mg/kg/day and half of the females at 300 mg/kg/day, were prematurely euthanized between Days 10 and 23 p.c. Macroscopic post-mortem lesions were observed in the stomach, intestines, liver and kidneys. At 300 mg/kg/day, the other findings observed in surviving females consisted of low net body weight change, gravid uterus and fetal weight.
At 100 mg/kg/day, no clinical signs were noted. Findings consisted of low body weight gain over the treatment period and macroscopic post-mortem lesions in the stomach of two females.
There were no effects on hysterectomy data at 100 or 300 mg/kg/day and no effects on fetal body weight at 100 mg/kg/day. At 300 mg/kg/day, when compared with controls and/or Historical Control Data, mean fetal body weight was lower (-11% vs. controls). This finding was attributed to the test item treatment
and correlated with the lower mean gravid uterus weight recorded at this dose level.
There were no external variations or malformations at fetal examination in the 100 and 300 mg/kg/day groups.
Based on the results of this study, the high dose level in the main study (study plan No. 47474 RSL) should be between 100 and 300 mg/kg/day.
Main study: A prenatal developmental toxicity study via oral gavage was performed in rabbits with test substance diethylaminopropylamine. The study was carried out according to GLP and to OECD test guideline No. 414 (25 June 2018). Three groups of 24 time-mated female New-Zealand White rabbits received the test item Diethylaminopropylamine (as pH-neutralized dose formulations, once daily by the oral route (gavage) at dose levels of 15, 50 or 130 mg/kg bw/day from Day 6 to Day 28 p.c. inclusive. A control group of 24 time-mated females received the vehicle (drinking water treated by reverse osmosis) under the same experimental conditions. A constant dosage volume of 2 mL/kg bw/day was used.
Actual concentrations of the test item in the dose formulations analyzed during the study were within an acceptable range of variations (-4.5% to +5.2%) when compared with the nominal concentrations.
The relevant endpoints are summarised in Table 12 of section "Any other information on results incl. tables". At hysterectomy on Day 29 p.c., 23/24, 21/24, 22/24 and 23/24 females were pregnant with live fetuses in the groups treated at 0, 15, 50 and 130 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. No test item-related deaths or clinical signs were recorded. Lower body weight gain was recorded between Days 6 and 29 p.c. at 50 and 130 mg/kg bw/day (-12% and -19% vs. controls, respectively; not statistically significant). These differences, which were especially due to continuous (at 50 mg/kg bw/day) or transient (at 130 mg/kg bw/day with p<0.05 on 2 interval days) lower body weight gain, did not impact the body weight on Day 29 p.c. and were considered to be non-adverse. This finding was associated with transient, non-adverse, slightly lower food consumption between Days 6 and 9 p.c. (-19%; p<0.05) at 130 mg/kg bw/day when compared with controls. No effects were observed at 15 mg/kg bw/day on body weight and food consumption. No effects were noted on gravid uterus weight, carcass weight or net body weight changes at any dose level. There were no test item-related macroscopic or microscopic findings at any dose level.
A slight increased mean post-implantation loss was noted from 50 mg/kg bw/day (up to 9.3% at 130 mg/kg bw/day vs. 2.6% in controls). As these variations were not statistically significant and were within the range of the HCD (min: 7.3 - max: 13.2%), they were not considered to be adverse. No other effects on the hysterectomy parameters were noted at any dose level. A minimally, not statistically significant and non-adverse lower mean fetal body weight was recorded at 130 mg/kg bw/day (-7% vs. controls) that correlated with minor findings of delayed ossification. No effects were noted on sex ratio at any dose level. No test item-related variations or malformations were observed at external examination at any dose level. Although a minor visceral abnormality (i.e. absence of brachiocephalic trunk) was noted from 50 mg/kg bw/day and minor findings of delayed ossification were noted in fetuses with higher litter and/or fetal incidences from 50 mg/kg bw/day (i.e. incomplete ossification of the 1st metacarpal) and at 130 mg/kg bw/day [i.e. unossification or incomplete ossification of the 6th sternebra(e), the 1st metacarpal and the 5th forepaw median phalanx, and/or incomplete ossification of pubis], no test item-related soft tissue or skeletal malformations were observed at any dose level.
Based on the results obtained in this study:
Toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Description of key information
No study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the criteria of the CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, the substance should not be classified as reproductive toxicant.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.