Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 941-224-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1969
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to internationally accepted test guidelines and is considered relevant, adequate and reliable. There were some deviations from the study guidelines, however these did not affect the conclusions and the validity of the study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 969
- Report date:
- 1969
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only one dose per test substance
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- trisodium 1,4-dioxo-1,4-bis(pentyloxy)butane-2-sulfonate pentane-1-sulfonate pentane-2-sulfonate
- EC Number:
- 941-224-7
- Molecular formula:
- C14H25O7S.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- trisodium 1,4-dioxo-1,4-bis(pentyloxy)butane-2-sulfonate pentane-1-sulfonate pentane-2-sulfonate
- Test material form:
- other: solid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report):AEROSOL ® AY; Sodium Diamylsulfosuccinate
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: > 97%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): See confidential details
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: See confidential details
- Isomers composition: Not provided
- Purity test date: Not provided
- Lot/batch No.: Lot#W-90214, SPS#8137
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: Not provided
- Stability under test conditions: Not provided
- Storage condition of test material: Not provided
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Charles River strain albino
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, North Wilmington, Mass.
- Age at study initiation: Not provided
- Weight at study initiation: 101 g (female rats), 122 g (male rats)
- Housing: individually in standard wire-bottomed steel rat cages
- Diet : standard rat ration blended with the appropriate amount of test material in a Hobart Mixer. Fresh diets were prepared each week. Each rat was offered an amount of diet sufficient for one week ‘ad libitum’ feeding. However, checks were made periodically to ensure that the food jars were
not empty.
- Water: No data provided
- Acclimation period: Not provided
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Not provided
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: 1.0% in the feed
Taking into account a mean body weight of 250 g and a mean food consumption of 20g/rat/day (Derelanko M.J., 2008, The Toxicologist's Pocket Handbook, Informa).
1% in the diet = 10000 mg/kg diet corresponds with 10 mg/g diet
20 g feed/rat (250g bw)/day = 80 g feed/kg bw/day = 0.8 g active ingredient/kg bw/day = 800 mg/kg bw/day.
A higher feed intake is possible, e.g. 1000 mg/kg at higher body weight and feed intake, but from a conservative viewpoint 750 mg/kg bw is taken.
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):Fresh diets were prepared each week
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): standard rat ration - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 90 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1.0%
Basis:
nominal in diet
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- For Aerosol AY: 20 male and 20 female at 1.0% dietary level + 20 male and 20 female as control
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Details on study design:
- Experimental Animals
The animals employed in the study were Charles River strain (Charles River Breeding Laboratories, North Wilmington, Mass.) albino rats. Two hundred and eighty rats (140 males and 140 females) were selected for the experiment, ear-punched with the animal number assigned and housed individually in standard wire-bottomed steel rat cages. Each cage bore a color-coded card identifying the animal with respect to project number, test material assignment, individual animal number and sex.
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily during the investigation
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: day 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE:
- Food consumption for each animal determined : Yes
and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: after 84 days
- Animals fasted: Yes (fasted serum glucose concentration)
- How many animals: 5 rats of each sex (=10) and 10 control
- Parameters checked in table [No.IV and V] were examined.
Hematocrit Value
Erythrocyte Count
Hemoglobin Concentration
Total Leukocyte Count
Differential Leukocyte Count
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: after 84 days
- Animals fasted: Yes (fasted serum glucose concentration)
- How many animals: 5 rats of each sex (=10) and 10 control
- Parameters checked in table [No.VI and VII] were examined.
Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Concentration
Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (SAP) Activity
Serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) Activity
Fasted Serum Glucose Concentration
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: after 84 days
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: No data
- Animals fasted: Yes
- Parameters checked in table [No.VIII] were examined.
Glucose Concentration
Albumin Concentration
Microscopic Elements Examination
pH
Specific Gravity
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes , but in general, not specific
- Time schedule for examinations: abnormal reactions and death were recorded daily during the investigation
- Dose groups that were examined: control and 1.0% dose
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / other:No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
ORGAN WEIGHTS: Yes - Statistics:
- Statistical analyses were conducted upon the absolute organ weights and their corresponding ratios to the weight of the body. An Analysis of Variance was conducted first and any significant effects disclosed by that treatment were further studied by “t” –tests.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 other: % in the diet
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No toxicological findings
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 750 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no toxicological findings
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The comparisons of final body weights and total weight gains revealed no statistically significant differences between test and control animals.
No outstanding differences in food consumption were noted between test rats and control rats.
No deaths or abnormal behavioral reactions were noted among any of the animals employed in the study.
No outstanding differences between test and control rats were noted with respect to any of the blood parameters studied.
No significant differences between the urine of test rats and control rats were observed.
No outstanding differences between test and control rats were noted at the time of gross pathological examination.
There were no significant differences between the tissues of test and control rats observed upon histopathological examination. - Executive summary:
Six groups of 40 albino rats (20 male, 20 female Charles River Strain) plus 1 control group (20 male, 20 female) were fed with 1% of various test items mixed into the diet. The various test items were category members ofthe Sulfosuccinates Diester Group, including Butanedioic acid, sulfo-, 1,4 -diamyl ester, sodium salt. After 84 days 5 hematological values, 4 blood chemical values, 5 urinalysis values were measured for all animals. 40 tissues have been examined pathologically at the conclusion of the 90-days test period. Organ to body weight and organ to brain weight ratios were calculated. Body weights organ to body weight ratios, hematologic studies and urinalysis were not different between test and control animals. No deaths or abnormal behavioral reactions occurred; no gross pathological findings were noted. Administration of category members at 1% in the diet (10000 ppm equivalent to 750 mg/kg body weight/day) for 90 days in rats did not result in any relevant changes in the subchronic toxicity study. The NOAEL was therefore considered to be ca.750 mg/kg bw/day.
The IBT Report, supplemented by the Intox report and the Validation Report of October 15, 1983, may be considered a valid study and the data and conclusions relied upon.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.