Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 404-800-4 | CAS number: 118832-72-7 IRGANOX L 118
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
No fertility study is available. However, in a 28 day repeated dose toxicity study performed in Sprague-Dawley rats, no effects on reproductive organs were evident up and including the highest dose tested (500 mg/kg body weight). No changes in organ weights were noted for ovaries and testes and no deviations from the control were evident in testes and ovaries at gross necropsy. According to a BAuA (German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) research report, effects on fertility and reproduction are not expected when a repeated dose study shows neither relevantly elevated testis or ovary weights nor histopathological alterations in those organs (BAuA Forschungsbericht Fb 984, 2003). Furthermore, Mangelsdorf et al. could show that reproductive organ parameters taken from 90 day studies are in fact more sensitive than fertility parameters that were measured during multi-generation studies (Mangelsdorf, 2003). It could also be shown that exposure for four weeks suffices for an assessment of male fertility, although 90 day studies have been regarded as superior in the past because they cover a complete cycle of spermatogenesis (Mangelsdorf, 2003). Therefore, since no effects on reproductive organs have been observed in the available 28 day oral toxicity studies, administration of the test article is not expected to affect reproductive performance.
References:
BAuA (2003). Extrapolation from results of animal studies to humans for the endpoint male fertility. Forschungsbericht Fb 984.
Mangelsdorf I, Buschmann J, Orthen B (2003). Some aspects relating to the evaluation of the effects of chemicals on male fertility. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 37: 356-369.
Short description of key information:
No effects on fertility are expected.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
In a teratogenicity study (OECD 414) the NOEL of the test substance was 50 mg/kg body weight per day for maternal toxicity and 300 mg/kg body weight per day for developmental toxicity. No embryotoxic or teratogenic effects were observed in any dose group.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1986-08-06 to 1987-09-07
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: OECD guideline study, GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Crl:CD(SD)BR
- Source: Charles River Wiga GmbH, 8741 Sulzfeld, West Germany.
- Age at study initiation: female: 8 - 12 weeks old, male: sexually mature
- Weight at study initiation: female: 180 - 240 g, male: no data
- Housing: Prior to mating and during mating, the female rats were housed in groups of 20 to 25 in communal cages. Mated female rats were individually housed in solid floor Macrolon cages of type II with stainless steel lids
- Diet: ad libitum (Ssniff R 10)
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 1 week prior to the start of mating
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19 - 25 °C
- Humidity: 40 - 70 %
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs light/ 12 hrs dark - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test article was daily prepared as solution In arachis oil. Separate preparations were made for each dose level. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples for analysis were taken from dose formulations prepared for each dose level on 17.11.1986 (first week of treatment), deep-frozen immediately after formulation, and sent to the sponsor for analysis.
- Details on mating procedure:
- The male and female animals were mated at a ratio of 1 : 4 in cages during the night. Vaginal smears were examined in the morning for the presence of sperm and/or a vaginal plug. The day on which sperm and/or a vaginal plug were observed was designated day 0 of gestation.
Since an insufficient number of pregnant rats was obtained in groups 1 and 3, further animals were added to these groups, i.e. three inseminated females (group 1) and eleven inseminated females (group 3). This deviation from the protocol was not considered to have adversely affected the outcome of the study. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The inseminated female rats were treated with the test substance daily from day 6 to 15 post-coitum (inclusive), maintained without treatment until day 20 post-coitum, and were sacrificed and examined on that day.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Duration of test:
- Until day 20 post-coitum
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 50, 150 and 300 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 rats
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: The body weight of each inseminated female rat was determined on days 0, 6 to 15, and 20 post-coitum, and evaluated for days 0, 6, 10, 15, and 20 post-coitum.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
The food consumption of each inseminated female was recorded for days 0 to 6, 6 to 10, 10 to 15, and 15 to 20 post-coitum.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
On day 20 post-coitum the female rats were sacrificed by carbon dioxide gas, dissected, and examined macroscopically for pathological changes. Any abnormalities observed were recorded.
- Organs examined: ovaries and uteri - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uteri were removed and examined and the following data recorded:
Number of corpora lutea in each ovary
Number and position of implantations subdivided into:
a: live foetuses
b: early resorptions
c: late resorptions
d: dead foetuses
Individual foetal weights
Sex of the foetuses - Fetal examinations:
- All foetuses were examined for external malformations.
Half of the foetuses from each litter (taking every second foetus in accordance with the position of the uterine horn, if possible) were eviscerated and preserved in 95 per cent ethanol for determination of skeletal abnormalities (Alizarin staining technique). The remaining half was fixed in Bouin's fixative for determination of visceral abnormalities (Wilson technique). - Statistics:
- For body weight, body weight gain, food consumption, litter weight, and foetal weights (overall, males, females), the analysis of variance was performed with one factor treatment.
In case of suspected significance, the four groups were compared at each time by the Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).
Number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, number of foetuses, preimplantation loss, post-implantation loss, and proportion of male foetuses (sex ratio) were statistically analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
In case of suspected significance (probability > chi square < 0.05), the four groups were compared two by two using the Wilcoxon 2-sample test (normal approximation - with continuity correction of 0.5).
The statistical evaluation was performed with the standard software program SAS release 6.02. - Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
In group 4 (300 mg/kg), group mean body weight on days 0, 10, and 15 of gestation was statistically significantly lower than in the control group and group mean body weight gain was statistically significantly (p < 0.05) reduced during the treatment period, particularly during the early treatment period from day 6 to 10 of gestation when compared to the control group (- 113 per cent). Therefore, body weight gain was also reduced from day 6 to 15 of gestation (- 32 per cent). This finding is considered to be compound-related. A slightly reduced body weight gain during the treatment period from day 6 to 15 of gestation (- 14 per cent) was also observed in group 3 (150 mg/kg), therefore, group mean body weight on day 15 p.c. was lower than in the control group. This finding might be compound-related. Mean daily food consumption of group 4 (300 mg/kg) was statistically significantly (p < 0.05) reduced during the treatment period (- 25 per cent from day 6 to 15 p.c.). In group 3 (150 mg/kg) a slightly statistically significantly reduced mean daily food consumption was also observed during the treatment period (-10 per cent from day 6 to 15 p.c.). These findings are considered to be a toxic or slightly toxic effect of the test article, respectively.
There was no effect of treatment on pregnancy incidence. An unusual high number of non-pregnant animals was observed in group 3 (150 mg/kg). There was no effect of treatment on implantation and on post-implantation loss. Post-implantation loss was highest in the control group. - Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
The mean number of fetuses per dam was similar in all groups. The sex distribution was not affected by treatment. Mean fetal weight was comparable In all groups. External malformations as rudimentarily developed tail and atresia ani were found in one fetus of group 3 (150 mg/kg). One further fetus of the same dose group had a visceral malformation as hydrocephalus. No skeletal malformations were found in any group. The incidence and nature of the external and visceral malformations are not considered to be related to treatment with the test substance. The incidence of skeletal and visceral variations was comparable in all groups and not attributable to treatment. - Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fetotoxicity
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Administration of the test article by oral gavage during the period of organogenesis (day 6 to 15 of gestation) at a dose level of 300 mg/kg elicited
maternal toxicity (reduced body weight gain, reduced food consumption) but no embryotoxicity or teratogenicity. - Executive summary:
In a GLP-compliant teratology study according to OECD guideline 414, groups of 25, 36, and 25 sexually mature and mated female rats received the test article by oral gavage at dosages of 50, 150, or 300 mg/kg daily for ten consecutive days from day 6 to 15 post-coitum. A further group of 28 rats of the same strain which received the vehicle (arachis oil) over the same period of time served as the control group. The animals were sacrificed on day 20 post-coitum. At 300 and at 150 mg/kg bw/day, reduced food consumption leading to reduced body weight gain of the dams was observed. There were no effects of treatment on pregnancy incidence and implantation; post-implantation loss was also not affected by treatment. There was no effect of treatment on the weight or sex of the foetuses. The mean number of foetuses per dam was similar in all groups. There was no effect of treatment on the incidence of foetuses showing external, visceral, or skeletal defects. In conclusion, administration of the test article by oral gavage during the period of organogenesis (day 6 to 15 of gestation) at a dose level of 300 mg/kg elicited maternal toxicity (reduced body weight gain, reduced food consumption) but no embryotoxicity or teratogenicity. At a dose level of 150 mg/kg, slight maternal toxicity (slightly reduced body weight gain and food consumption) was also observed but no embryotoxicity or teratogenicity. Administration of 50 mg/kg did not elicit maternal toxicity, embryotoxicity, or teratogenicity.
Reference
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
To evaluate toxic effects of the test substance on fetal development, a GLP compliant prenatal toxicity study (OECD 414) was performed with female Sprague-Dawley rats (Hazleton, 688-380/89, 1987). Groups of 25, 36, and 25 sexually mature and mated female rats received the test article by oral gavage at dose levels of 50, 150, or 300 mg/kg body weight, respectively. A further group of 28 was treated equally with the vehicle (arachis oil) alone. Treatment occurred daily from day 6 to 15 post-coitum and animals were sacrificed on day 20 post-coitum. There were no changes in behavior or clinical condition attributable to treatment and no treatment-related changes were observed at necropsy. Group mean body weight gain was reduced in group 4 (300 mg/kg) and slightly reduced in group 3 (150 mg/kg). At 150 and 300 mg/kg mean daily food consumption was dose-relatedly reduced. There was no effect of treatment on pregnancy incidence and implantation. Post-implantation loss was not affected by treatment and there was no effect on the weight or sex of the fetuses. The mean number of fetuses per dam was similar in all groups. The incidence of fetuses showing external, visceral, or skeletal defects was not increased when compared to control animals. In conclusion, administration of the test article by oral gavage during the period of organogenesis (day 6 to 15 of gestation) at a dose level of 300 mg/kg caused maternal toxicity (reduced body weight gain, reduced food consumption), which was less pronounced at the mid dose level. Effects on embryotoxicity or teratogenicity were not observed in any dose group. From the findings in this study, the maternal and fetal no observed effect level (NOEL) were 50 mg/kg and 300 mg/kg, respectively.
Similar results were obtained in a range finding study previously conducted (Hazleton, 615-380/43, 1986). In this study, groups of 12, 11, and 8 pregnant female rats were treated with the test article daily by oral gavage from gestation days 6 to 15 at dose levels of 50, 150, or 300 mg/kg, respectively. Treatment with the test substance at a dose level of 300 mg/kg elicited slight maternal toxicity (reduced body weight gain during treatment,) but no embryolethality was evident. At dose levels of 50 and 150 mg/kg, no toxic effects were observed. Therefore, the NOAEL for fetal development was set at 300 mg/kg body weight.
Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route:
GLP-compliant guideline study
Justification for classification or non-classification
Dangerous Substance Directive (67/548/EEC)
The available experimental test data is reliable and suitable for the purpose of classification under Directive 67/548/EEC.
Based on the data, the test substance has not to be classified for reproductive toxicity.
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for the purpose of classification under Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008.
Based on the data, the test substance has not to be classified for reproductive toxicity.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.