Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-285-2 | CAS number: 12158-74-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Basic toxicokinetics
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- basic toxicokinetics in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Further studies on various aspects of the use of high-copper supplements for growing pigs.
- Author:
- Allen, M.M., Barber, R.S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K.G.
- Year:
- 1 961
- Bibliographic source:
- Brit. J. Nutr., 15: 507-522
Materials and methods
- Objective of study:
- absorption
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study compared the effects of 250 ppm copper, given in the diet as the sulphate or the carbonate.
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Cu 1+ and Cu 2+ salts
- Molecular formula:
- Cu
- IUPAC Name:
- Cu 1+ and Cu 2+ salts
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test material: Cu2+ as copper sulphate (CuSO4.5H2O). Cu2+as basic copper carbonate (CuCO3.Cu(OH)2.H2O).
- Radiolabelling:
- no
Test animals
- Species:
- pig
- Strain:
- other: Strain: Large White. Source: Shinfield, virus pneumonia-free.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Test Animal Age: weaners.
Number of animals: 8 pigs on each of 6 treatments [48 animals in total of both sexes].
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Details on exposure:
- Oral administration of the test substances in the diet.
- Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
- Duration of treatment: Until bacon weight was reached. Frequency - with feed.
Doses / concentrations
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Cu in feed as sulphate or carbonate salt.
- No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
- 48 animals in total of each sex (8 per treatment)
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- Experimental design: The study consisted of 4 separate experiments; only experiment 2 (consisting of 6 separate treatments) is relevant to the purposes of this summary and is reported herein. Experiment 2 was designed as a 3 x 2 factorial. There were randomised blocks; blocks corresponding to litters, and treatments were allocated at random to the pens. There was no direct communication between pigs on different treatments.
- Details on dosing and sampling:
- Pigs on treatments 4, 5 and 6 were given twice daily as much meal as they would consume within 30 minutes up to a maximum of 61/2 lb/day, water at the rate of 3 lb to every 1 lb meal being added immediately before feeding. This system of feeding was termed semi-ad lib. Pigs on treatments 1, 2 and 3 were also given meal twice daily, 3 lb water per 1 lb of meal again being added immediately before feeding, but the amount of meal given was based on live weight and according to a scale, a daily maximum of 61/2 lb per pig being given to an animal weighing 170 lb. Sampling procedures and Analytical methods: All pigs were weighed once weekly throughout the experiment, the rations of the pigs in treatments 1, 2 and 3, which were fed to scale, being adjusted after each weekly weighing. All the pigs were sent to slaughter individually when their live weight at the weekly weighing exceeded 203 lb. A sample of liver tissue adjacent to the bile duct was taken at slaughter from each pig and stored at -20°C prior to determination of Cu.
- Statistics:
- Statistical analysis: Standard errors were calculated from randomised block analyses of variance, no adjustments being made for variation in either live weight or cold dead weight. The term 'treatment' is confounded with 'pen' but the pen effect was considered to be negligible.
Results and discussion
- Preliminary studies:
- Supplementation of the diet with either copper sulphate or copper carbonate resulted in large increases in the amount of Cu present in the livers at bacon weight, relative to un-supplemented controls. Mean liver copper concentrations of pigs fed diets to scale were 52, 843 and 624 mg/kg dry weight for control group, copper sulphate-treated and copper carbonate-treated animals, respectively. Corresponding Values for animals fed the semi-ad lib diet were 61, 779 and 383 mg Cu/kg dry weight.
Tox. behaviour: Copper derived from basic copper carbonate fed in the diet was somewhat less bioavailable than that from copper sulphate, when assessed in terms of liver copper concentration.
Main ADME results
- Type:
- other: bioavailability
- Results:
- Copper derived from basic copper carbonate fed in the diet was somewhat less bioavailable than that from copper sulphate, when assessed in terms of liver copper concentration.
Toxicokinetic / pharmacokinetic studies
- Details on absorption:
- The mean results for daily weight gain, food conversion efficiency, rate of food consumption and Cu content of the liver are shown in Table 1(attached), together with appropriate standard errors.
Recovery of labelled compound: Not applicable.
Metabolite characterisation studies
- Metabolites identified:
- not measured
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Copper derived from basic copper carbonate fed in the diet was somewhat less bioavailable than that from copper sulphate, when assessed in terms of liver copper concentration.
- Executive summary:
A study was carried out to evaluate the biological availability in pigs of Cu derived from basic copper carbonate, relative to that of Cu from copper sulphate pentahydrate. The study was not designed to follow internationally accepted guidelines, and was not carried out or reported in compliance with GLP.Fourty eight weaners were assigned to a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement in randomised blocks, with 8 animals in each of 6 treatment groups. Pigs in groups 1 and 3 (controls) received no supplementary copper in their diets; those in groups 2 and 5 received diets supplemented with 250 ppm copper sulphate pentahydrate and those in groups 3 and 6 received diets supplemented with 250 ppm basic copper carbonate. The manner of administration of these diets was varied as follows: Pigs on treatments 4, 5 and 6 were given twice daily as much meal as they would consume within 30 minutes up to a maximum of 6½ lb/day, water at the rate of 3 lb to every 1 lb meal being added immediately before feeding. This system of feeding was termed semi-ad lib. Pigs on treatments 1, 2 and 3 were also given meal twice daily, 3 lb water per 1 lb of meal again being added immediately before feeding, but the amount of meal given was based on live weight and according to a scale, a daily maximum of 6½ lb/pig being given to an animal weighing 170 lb. All pigs were weighed once weekly throughout the experiment, the rations of the pigs in treatments 1, 2 and 3, which were fed to scale, being adjusted after each weekly weighing. All the pigs were sent to slaughter individually when their live weight at the weekly weighing exceeded 203 lb. A sample of liver tissue adjacent to the bile duct was taken at slaughter from each pig and stored at –20 °C prior to determination of Cu. Supplementation of the diet with either 250 ppm copper sulphate or 250 ppm copper carbonate resulted in large increases in the amount of Cu present in the livers at bacon weight, relative to unsupplemented controls. Mean liver copper concentrations of pigs fed diets to scale were 52, 843 and 624 mg/kg dry weight for control group, copper sulphate-treated and copper carbonate-treated animals, respectively. Corresponding Values for animals fed the semi-ad lib diet were 61, 779 and 383 mg Cu/kg dry weight. It was therefore considered that there was some indication that the increase in liver copper stores was not so great when copper was given as the carbonate instead of as the sulphate, particularly with semi-ad lib feeding. The mean measured concentration resulting from copper carbonate supplementation for animals fed the diet to scale was 74 % of that resulting from copper sulphate supplementation. The mean measured concentration resulting from copper carbonate supplementation for animals fed the diet semi-ad lib was 49 % of that resulting from copper sulphate supplementation. Copper derived from basic copper carbonate fed in the diet was somewhat less bioavailable than that from copper sulphate, when assessed in terms of liver copper concentration.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)