Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction from a well-known and acknowledged tool. See below under ''attached justification' for QPRF containing methodology and domain evaluation details.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: REACH guidance on QSARs: Chapter R.6. QSARs and grouping of chemicals
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The partition coefficient (log Kow) value for the test substance were estimated using the KOWWIN v.1.68. program in EPI SuiteTM v4.11. The log Kow values were predicted for the main constituent and the impurity (present at >0.1%) using SMILES codes as the input parameter.
Type of method:
other: Fragment constant method
Partition coefficient type:
other: QSAR prediction
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
2.61
Remarks on result:
other: predicted value of the main constituent
Remarks:
KOWWIN v.1.69. EPI SuiteTM v4.11
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
3.15
Remarks on result:
other: predicted value for the impurity
Remarks:
using KOWWIN v.169 of EPI Suite TM v.4.11

Table 1: Log Kow predictions: Fragment constant method

Constituents

Mean/adjusted conc

Log KOW

Domain evaluation

2,4-xylenol

99.50 %

2.61

MW (ID), Structural fragments (ID)

 

2,4,6-trimethylphenol

0.50 %

3.15

MW (ID), Structural fragments (ID)

Details on results:

 2,4-xylenol

                 Log Kow(version 1.69 estimate): 2.61
Experimental Database Structure Match:
 Name    : 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
 CAS Num : 000105-67-9
 Exp Log P: 2.30 
 Exp Ref : HANSCH,C ET AL. (1995) 
 
SMILES : Cc1ccc(O)c(C)c1
CHEM  : 
MOL FOR: C8 H10 O1 
MOL WT : 122.17 ID 720
-------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------
 TYPE | NUM |       LOGKOW FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 
-------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------
 Frag | 2 | -CH3   [aliphatic carbon]               | 0.5473 | 1.0946 ID 13
 Frag | 6 | Aromatic Carbon                          | 0.2940 | 1.7640 ID 24
 Frag | 1 | -OH    [hydroxy, aromatic attach]       |-0.4802 | -0.4802 ID 3
 Const |    | Equation Constant                        |        | 0.2290
-------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------
                                                        Log Kow  =  2.6074

 2,4,6-trimethylphenol

                 Log Kow(version 1.69 estimate): 3.15
Experimental Database Structure Match:
 Name    : 2,4,6-TRIMETHYLPHENOL
 CAS Num : 000527-60-6
 Exp Log P: 2.73 
 Exp Ref : SANGSTER (1993) 
 
SMILES : Cc1cc(C)c(O)c(C)c1
CHEM  : 
MOL FOR: C9 H12 O1  ID 720
MOL WT : 136.20
-------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------
 TYPE | NUM |       LOGKOW FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        | COEFF | VALUE 
-------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------
 Frag | 3 | -CH3   [aliphatic carbon]               | 0.5473 | 1.6419 ID 13
 Frag | 6 | Aromatic Carbon                          | 0.2940 | 1.7640 ID 24
 Frag | 1 | -OH    [hydroxy, aromatic attach]       |-0.4802 | -0.4802 ID 3
 Const |    | Equation Constant                        |        | 0.2290
-------+-----+--------------------------------------------+---------+--------
                                                        Log Kow  =  3.1547
Conclusions:
Using the fragment constant method, of KOWWIN V.1.68 program of EPI SuiteTM, the partition coefficient (log Kow) value fof the main constituent and the impurity were predicted to bee of 2.61 and 3.15 respectively.
Executive summary:

The partition coefficient (log Kow) value for the test substance was predicted using the fragment constant method, of KOWWIN v.1.68 program. The log Kow values of the main constituent as well as the impurity (present above 0.1%) were predicted using SMILES codes as the input parameter. Using the fragment constant method, the log Kow values for the main constituent and the impurity were predicted to be 2.61 and 3.15 respectively (US EPA, 2021), suggesting moderate lipophilicity. The predictions were assessed to be within the molecular and structural domains. Further, considering the similarity between predicted and the experimental values for the three nearest structural analogues the overall predictions for the constituents can be considered to be accurate with low uncertainty.

Description of key information

The partition coefficient of the test substance was predicted using the KOWWIN v.1.68 module of EPI SuiteTM V.4.11 (US EPA, 2021)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
2.61

Additional information

The Partition coefficient (log Kow) value for main constituent and the impurity were predicted to be 2.61 and 3.15 respectively, suggesting a moderate lipophilicty potential for the test substance. Further, considering that the predictions for the main constituent and the impurity are in the same range, the value corresponding to the main constituent has been considered further for hazard/risk assessment.