Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Experimental start date - 03 November 2020; Experimental completion date - 05 November 2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification: 4-Hydroxycoumarin
CAS Number: 1076-38-6
Batch: HCN20002
Purity: >99%
Molecular Weight: 162.14
Physical state/Appearance: Beige powder
Expiry Date: 26 September 2022
Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
Distilled
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
Supplier: MatTek In Vitro Life Sciences Laboratories
Date received: 03 November 2020
EpiDermTM Tissues (0.63cm2) lot number: 34102
Assay Medium lot number: 102920LHB
Upon receipt of the EpidermTM tissues, the sealed 24-well plate was stored in a refrigerator until use.

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37 °C.

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1.0 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 60 minutes
- Spectrophotometer: Labtech LT-4500 microplate reader
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter band pass: 10 nm

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: Two

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: One

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
- The test substance is considered to be corrosive to skin if [complete, e.g. the viability after 3 minutes exposure is less than 50%, or if the viability after 3 minutes exposure is greater than or equal to 50 % and the viability after 1 hour exposure is less than 15%.]
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 25 mg

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied: 25 μL Distilled water

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 50 μL Distilled water

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 50 μL of 8.0 N Potassium Hydroxide
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 minutes and 60 minutes.
Number of replicates:
Two
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Experiment I
Value:
100.3
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: None
- Direct-MTT reduction: No
- Colour interference with MTT: The solution containing the test item was a white color. This color was attributed to the intrinsic color of the test item itself. It was therefore unnecessary to run color correction tissues.

DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: The mean OD570 for the negative control treated tissues was 2.029 for the 3-Minute exposure period and 1.911 for the 60-Minute exposure period. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 0.070% relative to the negative control following the 60-Minute exposure period. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
In the range 20 to 100% viability the Coefficient of Variation between the two tissue replicates of each treatment group did not exceed 30%. The acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item was considered to be non-corrosive to the skin.
Executive summary:

Introduction

The purpose of this test was to evaluate the corrosivity potential of the test item using the EpiDerm™ Human Skin Model after treatment periods of 3 and 60 minutes. This test was conducted in accordance with OECD test guideline 431 and Method B.40 in a GLP certified laboratory.

Methods

Duplicate tissues were treated with the negative control, positive control and test item for exposure periods of 3 and 60 minutes. At the end of the exposure period the control items and test item were rinsed from the tissues before each tissue was taken for MTT-loading.

After MTT-loading the tissues were placed into 2 mL of isopropanol for formazan extraction. At the end of the formazan extraction period each well was mixed thoroughly and triplicate 200 µL samples were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labeled 96-well plate. The optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm (OD570).

Data are presented in the form of percentage viability (MTT reduction in the test item treated tissues relative to negative control tissues).

Results

The relative mean viabilities for each treatment group were as follows:

 

Exposure Period

Percentage Viability

Negative Control

Positive Control

Test Item

3 minute

100*

3.6

100.3

60 minute

100*

3.6

109.3

*The mean viability of the negative control tissues is set at 100%

Acceptance criteria: The criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.

Conclusion: In this study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item was considered to be non-corrosive to the skin.

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Experimental start date - 11 November 2020; Experimental completion date - 16 November 2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification: 4-Hydroxycoumarin
CAS Number: 1076-38-6
Batch: HCN20002
Purity: >99%
Molecular Weight: 162.14
Physical state/Appearance: Beige powder
Expiry Date: 26 September 2022
Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
Sterile distilled
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
Supplier: EpiSkin Laboratories, Lyon, France
Date received: 10 November 2020
EpiSkinTM Tissues (0.38cm2) lot number: 20-EKIN-046
Maintenance Medium lot number: 20-MAIN3-037
Assay Medium lot number: 20-ESSC-036

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37 °C,
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 37 °C.


REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS : At the end of the exposure period, each tissue was removed from the well using forceps and rinsed using a wash bottle containing DPBS with Ca++ and Mg++. Rinsing was achieved by filling and emptying each tissue insert for approximately 40 seconds using a constant soft stream of DPBS to gently remove any residual test item.

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 0.3 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3hours
- Spectrophotometer: Labtech LT-4500 microplate reader
- Wavelength: OD 570
- Filter band pass: 10 nm

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: Triplicate

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: One
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 10 mg

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied: 5 μL Distilled water

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 10 μL DPBS

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 10 μL of SDS (5% w/v).
Duration of treatment / exposure:
15 minutes
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
42 hours
Number of replicates:
Three
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Experiment I
Value:
107.6
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: None
- Direct-MTT reduction: No
- Colour interference with MTT: The solution containing the test item was colorless. It was therefore unnecessary to run color correction tissues.

DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 3.7% relative to the negative control treated tissues and the standard deviation value of the viability was 0.9%. The positive control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
The mean OD570 for the negative control treated tissues was 0.731 and the standard deviation value of the viability was 14.8%. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
The standard deviation calculated from individual tissue viabilities of the three identically test item treated tissues was 2.5%. The test item acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item was considered to be non-irritant to the skin.
Executive summary:

Introduction

The purpose of this test was to evaluate the skin irritation potential of the test item using the EPISKIN reconstructed human epidermis model after a treatment period of 15 minutes followed by a post-exposure incubation period of 42 hours.

This test was conducted in accordance with OECD test guideline 439 and Method B.46 in a GLP certified laboratory.

Methods

Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item for an exposure period of 15 minutes. At the end of the exposure period each tissue was rinsed before incubating for 42 hours. At the end of the post-exposure incubation period each tissue was taken for MTT-loading. The maintenance medium from beneath each tissue was transferred to pre-labeled micro tubes and stored in a freezer for possible inflammatory mediator determination. After MTT-loading a total biopsy of each epidermis was made and placed into micro tubes containing acidified isopropanol for extraction of formazan crystals out of the MTT-loaded tissues.

At the end of the formazan extraction period each tube was mixed thoroughly and duplicate 200 μL samples were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labeled 96-well plate. The optical density was measured at 570 nm.

Data are presented in the form of percentage viability (MTT reduction in the test item treated tissues relative to negative control tissues).

Results

The relative mean viability of the test item treated tissues was 107.6% after the 15-Minute exposure period and 42-Hours post-exposure incubation period.

Acceptance criteria: The criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.

Conclusion: In this study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item was considered to be non-irritant to the skin.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Experiment start and end date - 06 November 2020.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Guidance Document on ‘The Collection of Tissues for Histological Evaluation and Collection of Data’. Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 160. Adopted July 6, 2018 Paris.
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification: 4-Hydroxycoumarin
CAS Number: 1076-38-6
Batch: HCN20002
Molecular Weight: 162.14
Purity: >99%
Physical state/Appearance: Beige powder
Expiry Date: 26 September 2022
Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark
Species:
cattle
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Source of Bovine Eyes
Eyes from adult cattle (typically 12 to 60 months old) were obtained from a local abattoir as a by-product from freshly slaughtered animals. The eyes were excised by an abattoir employee after slaughter, and were placed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 μg/mL). They were transported to the test facility over ice packs on the same day of slaughter. The corneas were prepared immediately on arrival.
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Remarks:
20% w/v test item in physiological saline.
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.75 mL

VEHICLE
- Amount applied: 0.75 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 minutes
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Three corneas were randomly allocated to the negative control. Three corneas were also allocated to the test item and three corneas to the positive control item.
Details on study design:
Preparation of Corneas
All eyes were macroscopically examined before and after dissection. Only corneas free of damage were used. The cornea from each selected eye was removed leaving a 2 to 3 mm rim of sclera to facilitate handling. The iris and lens were peeled away from the cornea. The isolated corneas were immersed in a dish containing HBSS until they were mounted in Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) holders.
The anterior and posterior chambers of each BCOP holder were filled with complete Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) without phenol red and plugged. The holders were incubated at 32 ± 1 ºC for 100 minutes. At the end of the incubation period each cornea was examined for defects. Only corneas free of damage were used.
The medium from both chambers of each holder was replaced with fresh complete EMEM. A pre-treatment opacity reading was taken for each cornea using a calibrated opacitometer

Treatment of Corneas
The EMEM was removed from the anterior chamber of the BCOP holder and 0.75 mL of the test item preparation or control items were applied to the appropriate corneas. The holders were gently tilted back and forth to ensure a uniform application of the item over the entire cornea. Each holder was incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 240 minutes.
At the end of the exposure period the test item and control items were removed from the anterior chamber and the cornea was rinsed 3 times with fresh complete EMEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete EMEM without phenol red. The anterior chamber was refilled with fresh complete EMEM without phenol red. A post-treatment opacity reading was taken and each cornea was visually observed.

NUMBER OF REPLICATES : Three

NEGATIVE CONTROL USED :
Identification: Sodium chloride 0.9% w/v Lot: 19I16BA1B
Purity: 0.9%
Supplier: Baxter Healthcare SA
Expiry Date: 18 September 2022
Storage Conditions: Room temperature

POSITIVE CONTROL USED :
Identification: Imidazole
Batch: SLCD2401
Supplier: Sigma Aldrich
Purity: >99%
Expiry Date: 24 August 2021
Storage Conditions: Room temperature in the dark


POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: yes
Application of Sodium Fluorescein
Following the opacity measurement the permeability of the corneas to sodium fluorescein was evaluated. The medium from the anterior chamber was removed and replaced with 1 mL of sodium fluorescein solution (5 mg/mL). The dosing holes were plugged and the holders incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 90 minutes.

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: The change in opacity for each cornea (including the negative control) was calculated by subtracting the initial opacity reading from the final opacity reading. These values were then corrected by subtracting the average change in opacity observed for the negative control
corneas. The mean opacity value of each treatment group was then calculated by averaging the corrected opacity values of each cornea for that treatment group.
- Corneal permeability: After incubation the medium in the posterior chamber of each holder was decanted and retained.
360 μL of media representing each cornea was dispensed into the appropriate wells of a pre-labeled 96-well plate. The optical density was measured (quantitative viability analysis) at 492 nm (without a reference filter) using the Labtech LT-4500 microplate reader.
The corrected OD492 was calculated by subtracting the mean OD492 of the negative control corneas from the OD492 value of each treated cornea. The OD492 value of each treatment group was calculated by averaging the corrected OD492 values of the treated corneas for the
treatment group.

- Others (histopathology): The corneas were retained after testing for possible conduct of histopathology. Each cornea was placed into a pre-labeled tissue cassette fitted with a histology sponge to protect the endothelial surface. The cassette was immersed in 10% neutral buffered formalin
- Visual Observation: The condition of the cornea was visually assessed post treatment.

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
The following formula was used to determine the In Vitro Irritancy Score:
In Vitro Irritancy Score = mean opacity value + (15 x mean permeability OD492 value).
Additionally, the opacity and permeability values were evaluated independently to determine whether the test item induced a response through only one of the two endpoints


DECISION CRITERIA:
The test item was classified according to the following prediction model:
IVIS UN GHS
≤ 3 No Category
>3; ≤ 55 No prediction can be made
> 55 Category 1

Criteria for an Acceptable Test
For an acceptable test the following positive control criterion should be achieved:
20% w/v Imidazole was used for positive control purposes. The test was acceptable if the positive control produced an In Vitro Irritancy Score which fell within two standard deviations of the historical mean collated during the previous 12 months for this testing
facility.
For an acceptable test the following negative control criteria should be achieved:
Sodium chloride 0.9% w/v was used for negative control purposes. The test was acceptable if the negative control produced an In Vitro Irritancy Score which is less than or equal to the upper limit for background opacity and permeability values calculated from the previous 12 months data for this testing facility.
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Test item
Value:
13.4
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Score: 0.1
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Score: 99
Remarks on result:
not determinable because of methodological limitations
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: The corneas treated with the test item were cloudy post treatment. The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear post treatment. The corneas treated with the positive control item were cloudy post treatment.

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
The positive control In Vitro Irritancy Score was within the acceptance range. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
The negative control gave opacity and permeability values below the established upper limits. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
According to UN GHS Classification for the test item 4-Hydroxycoumarin, No Prediction of eye irritation can be made under the conditions of the test.
Executive summary:

The purpose of this test was to identify test items that can induce serious eye damage and to identify test items not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test method was used for this purpose. The study was conducted in accordance with OECD test guideline 437 and Method B.47 of Comission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008, in a GLP certified laboratory.

The test item was applied at a concentration of 20% w/v in sodium chloride 0.9% w/v for 240 minutes. Negative control (Sodium chloride) and positive control (Imidazole) were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).

The test item is classified according to the prediction model as follows:

IVIS

UN GHS

≤ 3

No Category

>3; ≤ 55

No prediction can be made

> 55

Category 1

Results

The In Vitro irritancy scores are summarized as follows:

Treatment

In Vitro Irritancy Score

Test Item

13.4

Negative Control

0.1

Positive Control

99.0

According to UN GHS Classification for the test item 4-Hydroxycoumarin, no Prediction of eye irritation can be made under the conditions of the test.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification