Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Palmitoyl chloride is sensitizing in a valid pre-guideline LLNA.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
The protocoll used was the basis of the OECD Guideline 429 LLNA. However, it is a probably a non-GLP study with minor deviations to the OECD Guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
minor
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method was according to Kimber and Basketter 1992
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
probably non-GLP
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
no details given
Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
5, 10, 25 %
No. of animals per dose:
not reported
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: no details reported

MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: LLNA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: a stimulation index ≥ 3, together with consideration of dose-response

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Groups of mice are exposed daily, for 3 consecutive days, to various concentrations of the test chemical or to the relevant vehicle alone, on the dorsum of both ears. Subsequently on 5 days following the initiation of exposure, mice are injected intravenously with [3H]thymidine and activity measured as a function of isotope incorporation in draining auricular lymph nodes (Kimber and Basketter, 1992).
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.1
Test group / Remarks:
5%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
3.3
Test group / Remarks:
10%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
4.5
Test group / Remarks:
25%
Executive summary:

Groups of mice are exposed daily, for 3 consecutive days, to various concentrations of the test chemical or to the relevant vehicle alone, on the dorsum of both ears. On day 5 following the initiation of exposure, mice are injected intravenously with [3H]thymidine and activity measured as a function of isotope incorporation in draining auricular lymph nodes (Kimber and Basketter, 1992). A stimulation index ≥ 3, together was observed at the concentrations 10% and 25%, but not at 5%. Therefore, hexadecanoylchloride (palmitoyl chloride) is regarded as sensitizing in the LLNA.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

In a valid pre-guideline LLNA groups of mice are exposed daily, for 3 consecutive days, to various concentrations of the test chemical or to the relevant vehicle alone, on the dorsum of both ears. On day 5 following the initiation of exposure, mice are injected intravenously with [3H]thymidine and activity measured as a function of isotope incorporation in draining auricular lymph nodes (Kimber and Basketter, 1992). A stimulation index ≥ 3 was observed at concentrations >= 10%. Therefore, hexadecanoylchloride (palmitoyl chloride) is regarded as sensitizing in the LLNA (Ashby, 1995).


Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data on skin sensitization the substance is classified as Skin Sens. Cat 1B (H317) according to criteria of Regulation EC/1272/2008 (CLP).

Respiratory sensitization classification is not warranted, as there are no known human case reports.