Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-290-0 | CAS number: 2246580-61-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type fo genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 31 October - 1 December 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- OECD 471
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (1S)-1-cyclopropylethanamine; (2R)-2-hydroxy-2-phenyl-acetic acid
- EC Number:
- 946-290-0
- Cas Number:
- 2246580-61-8
- Molecular formula:
- C8H7O3.C5H12N
- IUPAC Name:
- (1S)-1-cyclopropylethanamine; (2R)-2-hydroxy-2-phenyl-acetic acid
- Test material form:
- solid: bulk
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- IN 79066, batch number KLP04616, was a white solid. It was received on 24 October 2016
and stored at 15-25°C, protected from light. Purity was stated as 99.5% (by HPLC) and the
expiry date was given as 12 October 2017, see Certificate of Analysis.
Method
- Target gene:
- Four strains of Salmonella typhimurium bacteria (TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537) and
one strain of Escherichia coli bacteria (WP2 uvrA pKM101) were used in this study. Strains
TA98, TA1535 and TA1537 were originally obtained from the UK NCTC. Strain TA100 was
derived from cultures originally obtained from Covance Laboratories Inc., USA. Strain WP2
uvrA pKM101 was obtained from MolTox Inc., USA.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 treatments of all the tester strains were performed in the absence and in the
presence of S-9, using final concentrations of IN 79066 at 5, 16, 50, 160, 500, 1600 and
5000 μg/plate, plus vehicle and positive controls. Following these treatments no evidence of
toxicity was observed, as would normally be manifest as a thinning of the background
bacterial lawn and/or a marked reduction in revertant numbers.
Experiment 2 treatments of all the tester strains were performed in the absence and in the
presence of S-9. The maximum test concentration of 5000 μg/plate was retained for all
strains. Narrowed concentration intervals were employed covering the range
160-5000 μg/plate, in order to examine more closely those concentrations of IN 79066
approaching the maximum test concentration and considered therefore most likely to provide
evidence of any mutagenic activity. In addition, all treatments in the presence of S-9 were
further modified by the inclusion of a pre-incubation step. In this way, it was hoped to
increase the range of mutagenic chemicals that could be detected using this assay system.
Following these treatments no evidence of toxicity was observed.
The test article was completely soluble in the aqueous assay system at all concentrations
treated, in each of the experiments performed. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (AAN)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The test system was suitably labelled to clearly identify the study number, bacterial strain,
test article concentration (where appropriate), positive and vehicle controls, absence or
presence of S-9 mix. - Rationale for test conditions:
- The assay was to be considered valid if the following criteria were met:
1. The vehicle control counts fell within the laboratory’s historical control ranges as defined
in Section 6.2
2. The positive control chemicals induced increases in revertant numbers of ≥2-fold (in
strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA pKM101) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 and The assay was to be considered valid if the following criteria were met:
1. The vehicle control counts fell within the laboratory’s historical control ranges as defined
in Section 6.2
2. The positive control chemicals induced increases in revertant numbers of ≥2-fold (in
strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA pKM101) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 and The assay was to be considered valid if the following criteria were met:
1. The vehicle control counts fell within the laboratory’s historical control ranges as defined
in Section 6.2
2. The positive control chemicals induced increases in revertant numbers of ≥2-fold (in
strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA pKM101) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 and TA1537) the concurrent vehicle control confirming discrimination between different strains, and an active S-9 preparation
3. At least five analysable concentrations of the test article are available. - Evaluation criteria:
- For valid data, the test article was considered to be mutagenic if:
1. A concentration related increase in revertant numbers was ≥2-fold (in strains TA98,
TA100 or, WP2 uvrA pKM101) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 or TA1537) the concurrent
vehicle control values
2. Any observed response is reproducible.
The test article was considered positive in this assay if both of the above criteria were met.
The test article was considered negative in this assay if neither of the above criteria were met.
Results which only partially satisfied the above criteria were dealt with on a case-by-case
basis. Biological relevance was taken into account, for example consistency of response
within and between concentrations and (where applicable) between experiments. - Statistics:
- Individual plate counts were recorded separately and the mean and standard deviation of the
plate counts for each treatment were determined. Control counts were compared with the
laboratory’s historical control ranges (Section 6.2 and Section 6.3). Data were considered
acceptable if the vehicle control counts fell within the calculated historical control ranges and
the positive control plate counts were comparable with the historical control ranges.
The presence or otherwise of a concentration response was checked by non-statistical
analysis, up to limiting levels (for example toxicity, precipitation or 5000 μg/plate).
However, adequate interpretation of biological relevance was of critical importance.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded that IN 79066 did not induce mutation in four histidine-requiring strains
(TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537) of Salmonella typhimurium, and one tryptophanrequiring
strain (WP2 uvrA pKM101) of Escherichia coli when tested under the conditions of
this study. These conditions included treatments at concentrations up to 5000 μg/plate (the
maximum recommended concentration according to current regulatory guidelines), in the
absence and in the presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S-9).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.