Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of lithium sodium hydrogen 4-amino-6-({5-[(5-chloro-2,6-difluoropyrimidin-4-yl)amino]-2-sulfonatophenyl}diazenyl)-5-hydroxy-3-[(4-{[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl}phenyl)diazenyl]naphthalene-2,7-disulfonate and lithium sodium hydrogen 4-amino-6-({5-[(5-chloro-2,6-difluoropyrimidin-4-yl)amino]-2-sulfonatophenyl}diazenyl)-5-hydroxy-3-{[4-(vinylsulfonyl)phenyl]diazenyl}naphthalene-2,7-disulfonate
EC number: 941-533-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_ecotoxicological-information.png)
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From August 14, 2001 to August 17, 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Remarks:
- to show absence of growth inhibitory effect of the test substance in plants
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- 0 and 72 h
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION OF STOCK SOLUTION
- Method: A stock solution was prepared by dissolving 250.3 mg of the test substance in 2 L of dilution water and treating for 1 h on a magnetic stirrer. - Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
- Details on test organisms:
- - Strain: CHODAT (non-axenic strain)
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Obtained from the 'Collection of Algal Cultures' of the Institute of Plant Physiology at the University of Gottingen (Germany)
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Pre-cultures were set up three days before the start of the test.
- Method of cultivation: The algal cultures for the test were taken from an exponentially-growing pre-culture and were mixed with the nutrient medium to make up to a final cell density of about 10E4 cells/mL in the test medium.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 3 d
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): Same as test - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 21-25°C
- pH:
- Control (Part III) - 7.6 at 0 h, to 9.1 at 72 h
Part I - 7.7 at 0 h, to 8.9 at 72 h
Part II - 7.6 at 0 h, to 9.0 at 72 h - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- - Nominal concentrations: 0.4, 1.0, 2.3, 4.7, 10.3, 22.7 and 50 mg/L
- Measured concentrations ranged from 102-117% of nominal values at 0 h, and from 73-113% of nominal values at 72 h. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 200 mL glass beakers
- Culturing apparatus: Light chamber in which a temperature in the range 21-25°C could be maintained and continuous uniform illumination could be provided in the spectral range 400 to 700 nm.
- Initial cell density: 10E4 cells/mL
- Experimental design:
Part I: 7 test concentrations with the algae (a test flask at the highest test concentration without algae was run in parallel to check whether or not significant amount of the test substance was incorporated into the algal biomass during the test period)
Part II: Glass beakers containing the algae, placed under glass vessels containing the above 7 test concentrations
Part III: Glass beakers containing the algae, placed under glass vessels containing the test medium (control group)
- Test concentrations (nominal): 0.4, 1.0, 2.3, 4.7, 10.3, 22.7 and 50 mg/L
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- Duration of exposure: 72 h
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Culture medium different from test medium: No
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
- Criteria for effects: Adverse effects were monitored at 72 h by determining the test substance induced inhibition of growth [b] and growth rate [r] of the algal population
- Determination of cell density: Microcell counter or microscopic counting chamber
- Observation points: 24, 48 and 72 h - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC10/EC50
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- No algicidal effect observed. The growth inhibition results from algistatic light absorption by the discolouration of the test medium. Therefore, a true algicidal effect of the test substance was not observed in this study, i.e. the true ErC50 was >50 mg/L.
- Details on results:
- No algicidal effect observed. The growth inhibition results from algistatic light absorption by the discolouration of the test medium. Therefore, a true algicidal effect of the test substance was not observed in this study, i.e. the true ErC50 was >50 mg/L.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- - EC10/EC50 determination by Probit analysis
- NOEC/LOEC determination by Dunnett's test - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- A true algicidal effect of the test substance was not observed in this study, i.e. the true ErC50 was >50 mg/L. Hence, under the conditions of the study, EC50 for gowth inhibition could not be determined up to the highest tested concentration (50 mg/L).
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the acute toxicity of the test substance to the algae Desmodesmus subspicatus according to EU Method C.3, in compliance with GLP. Triplicate inocula of the algae were exposed to nominal concentrations of the test substance (0.4, 1.0, 2.3, 4.7, 10.3, 22.7 and 50 mg/L) for 72 h under static conditions (Part I). Analytical validation of the applied concentrations was carried out using HPLC. A second series (Part II) of test vessels treated in the same way as the controls (Part III), but placed below glass vessels containing the same range of concentrations of the test substance as described above, but without algae, was set up to distinguish between algistatic (indirect effect caused by light absorption) and algicidal (phytotoxic) effects. The cell densities were measured at 24, 48 and 72 h. Inhibition of the algal population was measured as reduction in biomass and growth rate, relative to control cultures grown under identical conditions. The measured concentrations of the test substance ranged from 102 -117% of nominal values at 0 h, and from 73 -113% of nominal values at 72 h. The growth inhibition observed in this study results from algistatic light absorption by the discolouration of the test medium. Therefore, a true algicidal effect of the test substance was not observed in this study, i.e. the true ErC50 was >50 mg/L. Hence, under the conditions of the study, ErC50 for gowth inhibition could not be determined up to the highest tested concentration (50 mg/L) (Bruns, 2001b). In the terrestrial plant growth inhibition test, there was no effect up to 500 mg/kg dw soil, clearly showing that the substance has no phytotoxic properties.
Reference
Percentage inhibition of cell growth (integral of biomass) and growth rate:
Part |
Nominal concentration of test substance (mg/L) |
Percentage inhibition of cell growth [b] |
Percentage inhibition of mean growth rate [r] |
III (Control) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
I (Test substance in contact with the algae) |
0.4 |
10.2 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
27.1 |
10.6 |
|
2.3 |
42.3 |
18.0 |
|
4.7 |
64.3 |
32.6 |
|
10.3 |
76.7 |
53.5 |
|
22.7 |
90.8 |
71.7 |
|
50 |
98.5 |
100.0 |
|
II (Test substance not in contact with the algae. It was present in the glass vessel that was placed over the beaker containing the algae) |
0.4 |
5.0 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
24.7 |
5.2 |
|
2.3 |
41.0 |
12.7 |
|
4.7 |
56.1 |
25.5 |
|
10.3 |
77.3 |
50.5 |
|
22.7 |
91.4 |
70.5 |
|
50 |
95.1 |
85.3 |
It can be clearly seen that there is no difference between treatment I and II. Therefore, the substance has no algicidal effect.
Description of key information
A true algicidal effect of the test substance was not observed in this study, i.e. the true ErC50 was >50 mg/L. Hence, under the conditions of the study, ErC50 for growth inhibition could not be determined up to the highest tested concentration (50 mg/L). For this reason, the study cannot be used for the classification and PNEC derivation purposes.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A study was conducted to determine the acute toxicity of the test substance to the algae Desmodesmus subspicatus according to EU Method C.3, in compliance with GLP.Triplicate inocula of the algae were exposed to nominal concentrations of the test substance (0.4, 1.0, 2.3, 4.7, 10.3, 22.7 and 50 mg/L) for 72 h under static conditions (Part I). Analytical validation of the applied concentrations was carried out using HPLC. A second series (Part II) of test vessels treated in the same way as the controls (Part III), but placed below glass vessels containing the same range of concentrations of the test substance as described above, but without algae, was set up to distinguish between algistatic (indirect effect caused by light absorption) and algicidal (phytotoxic) effects. The cell densities were measured at 24, 48 and 72 h. Inhibition of the algal population was measured as reduction in biomass and growth rate, relative to control cultures grown under identical conditions.The measured concentrations of the test substance ranged from 102 -117% of nominal values at 0 h, and from 73 -113% of nominal values at 72 h.The growth inhibition observed in this study results from algistatic light absorption by the discolouration of the test medium. Therefore, a true algicidal effect of the test substance was not observed in this study, i.e. the true ErC50 was >50 mg/L. Hence, under the conditions of the study, ErC50 for gowth inhibition could not be determined up to the highest tested concentration (50 mg/L) (Bruns, 2001b).
In the terrestrial plant growth inhibition test, there was no effect up to 500 mg/kg dw soil, clearly showing that the substance has no phytotoxic properties.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)