Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 950-968-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 January 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study conducted according to OECD test Guideline No. 438 without any deviation.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 438 (Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- 25 June 2018
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- UK GLP Compliance Monitoring Programme (inspected on 21/08/2018 / signed on 19/11/2018)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 5-(2,3-dimethyltricyclo[2.2.1.02,6]hept-3-yl)-2-methylpent-2-en-1-ol, stereoisomer
- EC Number:
- 204-102-8
- EC Name:
- 5-(2,3-dimethyltricyclo[2.2.1.02,6]hept-3-yl)-2-methylpent-2-en-1-ol, stereoisomer
- Cas Number:
- 115-71-9
- Molecular formula:
- C15H24O
- IUPAC Name:
- 5-(2,3-dimethyltricyclo[2.2.1.0~2,6~]hept-3-yl)-2-methylpent-2-en-1-ol
- Reference substance name:
- [1S-[1α,2α(Z),4α]]-2-methyl-5-(2-methyl-3-methylenebicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl)-2-penten-1-ol
- EC Number:
- 201-027-2
- EC Name:
- [1S-[1α,2α(Z),4α]]-2-methyl-5-(2-methyl-3-methylenebicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl)-2-penten-1-ol
- Cas Number:
- 77-42-9
- Molecular formula:
- C15H24O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methyl-5-(2-methyl-3-methylenebicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl)pent-2-en-1-ol
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
- Details on test material:
- - Appearance: Colourless viscous liquid
- Storage conditions: Dry area, protected from light in a refrigerator (temp 2-8°C) stored under nitrogen in a closed container after every opening
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- chicken
- Strain:
- other: Spring chickens (Gallus Gallus e.g. Ross 308 Broiler)
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Spring chickens (Gallus Gallus e.g. Ross 308 Broiler), were supplied by Baileys Turkeys Ltd., Cheshire, UK
- Number of animals: 8
- Characteristics of donor animals (e.g. age, sex, weight): The chickens weighed approximately 3 kg and were approximately 56 days old prior to being humanely killed for human consumption.
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue (e.g. transport time, transport media and temperature, and other conditions): Heads were removed immediately after the chickens had been humanely killed at the source, for use on the same day.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: The time interval between collection of chicken heads and placing the eyes in the superfusion chamber following enucleation was minimized although all eyes had to fall within the acceptance criteria identified in the test guideline.
Date / Time Of Slaughter: 15.01.2020 0710 am
Date / Enucleation End Time: 15.01.2020 0940 am
- indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: none
- Indication of any antibiotics used: none
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.03 mL of test item (undiluted) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test item was applied for 10 seconds and then rinsed from the eye using 20mL of isotonic saline
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- Evaluation of the corneas at 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes (±5 minutes) after the eyes have been decontaminated
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Test item: 3 eyes
Positive control: 3 eyes
Negative control: 2 eyes - Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF ISOLATED EYES
Eyes that had a high baseline fluorescein staining (>0.5) or corneal opacity score (>0.5) after the enucleation process were rejected.
Eyelids were carefully excised whilst taking care not to damage the cornea. The integrity of the cornea was measured with a drop of 2% (w/v) sodium fluorescein to the surface of the cornea and then rinsed with isotonic saline after a few seconds. The treated eyes were examined with the use of the Haag-Streit BQ 900 (Switzerland) microscope, to examine for damage to the cornea. An acceptable eye for the ICE test was one where the fluorescein retention and corneal opacity scores are ≤ 0.5.
Acceptable eyes were dissected from the skull and pulled from the orbit by holding the nictitating membrane firmly with surgical forceps. The tissue behind the eye was carefully removed with bent, blunt tipped scissors. Once the eye was removed from the orbit a portion of the optic nerve remained. Other connective tissue was removed from the eye on an absorbent tray liner.
Enucleated eyes were transferred to an appropriate clamp keeping the cornea vertical. They were then transferred to chambers within the superfusion apparatus ensuring the corneas received sufficient isotonic saline from the saline drip. The mean temperature of the chambers was at 32 ±1.5 °C.
Once all eyes were placed in the superfusion apparatus, the eyes were examined again with the Haag-Streit BQ 900 to ensure the eyes had not been damaged by the dissection procedure. Corneal thickness measurements are taken with a depth measuring device no. 1 on the Haag-Streit BQ 900 slit lamp microscope at the center of each cornea.
Eyes were replaced when: (i) the fluorescein score was > 0.5; (ii) the corneal opacity score was > 0.5; or (iii) there was any additional signs of damage, (iv) the corneal thickness measurements for individual eyes deviated more than 10% from the mean value for all eyes.
EQUILIBRATION AND BASELINE RECORDINGS
After the approval process the eyes were incubated for approximately 45 minutes for equilibrium purposes. Time zero measurements for corneal thickness and opacity were taken to serve as a baseline. The baseline for the fluorescein measurements were taken at dissection.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
The test item and positive control item groups consisted of three eyes and the negative control item consisted of two eyes.
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED
0.03 mL of the negative control item, Sodium chloride 0.9% w/v, was applied to the cornea of each negative control eye.
POSITIVE CONTROL USED
0.03 g of the positive control item, Benzalkonium chloride (5% v/v), was similarly applied to the cornea of each positive control eye.
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
- Immediately following the zero reference measurements, each test eye (including clamp) was removed from the superfusion apparatus and placed horizontally (cornea facing upwards) into a petri dish.
- 0.03 mL of test item was applied to the cornea. The entire surface of the cornea was evenly covered.
OBSERVATION PERIOD
- Treated corneas were evaluated prior to treatment and at 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes (± 5 minutes) after the eyes had been decontaminated with the isotonic saline.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Volume and washing procedure after exposure period: The test item remained in place for 10 seconds and was then rinsed from the eye using 20 mL of isotonic saline. The treated eye (including clamp) was subsequently returned to the superfusion apparatus in the original upright position.
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Yes
- Damage to epithelium based on fluorescein retention: Yes
- Swelling: measured with optical pachymeter on a slit-lamp microscope; slit-width setting: Yes (e.g. pitting, sloughing or roughening of the epithelium).
- Macroscopic morphological damage to the surface: Yes
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Mean corneal swelling (%): Percentage corneal swelling was assessed from corneal thickness measurements. The calculation was expressed in the following formula:
[(corneal thickness at time (t) / corneal thickness at time = 0) / corneal thickness at time =0] x 100
Mean percentage of corneal swelling for all test eyes was calculated for all the time points. The overall category score was determined from the highest mean score for epithelial swelling as observed at any time point.
- Mean maximum opacity score: Corneal opacity was calculated with the most densely opacified areas for scoring. The mean value for all test eyes was calculated for all time points. The highest mean score, as observed at any time point was given an overall category for each test item.
0: No opacity
0.5: Very faint opacity
1: Scattered or diffuse areas; details of the iris clearly visible
2: Easily discernible translucent area; details of the iris are slightly obscured
3: Severe corneal opacity; no specific details of the iris are visible; size of the pupil is barely discernible
4: Complete corneal opacity; iris invisible
- Mean fluorescein retention score at 30 minutes post-treatment: The mean fluorescein retention scores for all test eyes are calculated at the 30 minute time interval only. These measurements are used for the overall classification for each test item.
0: No fluorescein retention
0.5: Very minor single cell staining
1: Single cell staining scattered throughout the treated area of the cornea
2: Focal or confluent dense single cell staining
3: Confluent large areas of the cornea retaining fluorescein
DECISION CRITERIA:
Results from corneal opacity, swelling, and fluorescein retention should be evaluated separately to generate an ICE class for each endpoint. The ICE classes for each endpoint are then combined to generate an Irritancy Classification for each test item.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- maximal mean score
- Run / experiment:
- 10 seconds exposure
- Value:
- 0.8
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 0.8 (ICE Class II)
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 4.0 (ICE Class IV)
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- ICE Class II
- Irritation parameter:
- fluorescein retention score
- Run / experiment:
- 10 seconds exposure
- Value:
- 0.8
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 0.5 (ICE Class I)
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 3.0 (ICE Class IV)
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- ICE Class II
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Remarks:
- Maximal mean
- Run / experiment:
- 10 seconds exposure
- Value:
- 1.61
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 4.92 (ICE Class I)
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 44.63 (ICE Class IV)
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- ICE Class II
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system:
1/ Corneal Opacity Scores
Very faint opacity was noted in one negative control treated eye.
Scattered or diffused areas of opacity were noted in one negative control treated eye.
Complete corneal opacity was noted in all positive control treated eyes.
Very faint opacity was noted in one test item treated eye.
Scattered or diffused areas of opacity were noted in two test item treated eyes.
No morphological effects were noted in the test item, positive or negative control item treated eyes apart from a sunken cornea noted in one test item treated eye.
2/ Fluorescein Retention Scores
Very minor single cell staining was noted in the negative control treated eyes.
Confluent large areas of the cornea retaining fluorescein was noted in all positive control treated eyes.
Very minor single cell staining was noted in one test item treated eye.
Single cell staining scattered throughout the treated area of the cornea was noted in two test item treated eyes.
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: yes
In order to confirm the acceptability of the test, a comparison was made with historical control data for negative and positive controls obtained by the laboratory (Annex 2). The test was considered acceptable as the concurrent negative and positive controls were identified as GHS Non-Classified and GHS Category 1 respectively.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes, the negative control is identified as GHS-Non Classified
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes, the positive control is identified as GHS Category 1
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline: In order to confirm the acceptability of the test, a comparison was made with historical control data for negative and positive controls obtained by the laboratory. The test was considered acceptable as the concurrent negative and positive controls were identified as GHS Non-Classified and GHS Category 1 respectively.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 7.3.2/3: Individual Scores and Mean Scores for Corneal Effects – Test Item
End Point |
Eye Number |
Time |
||||||
0 |
30 minutes |
75 minutes |
120 minutes |
180 minutes |
240 minutes |
|||
Corneal Opacity |
3A |
0.5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
6A |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
||
8A |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
||
Mean |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
||
ICE Class |
II |
|||||||
Fluorescein Retention |
3A |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
6A |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
||
8A |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
||
Mean |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
||
ICE Class |
II |
|||||||
Corneal Thickness |
3A |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
|
6A |
0.65 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.61 |
||
8A |
0.61 |
0.60 |
0.62 |
0.63 |
0.63 |
0.64 |
||
Mean |
0.62 |
0.61 |
0.61 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.63 |
||
Mean Corneal Swelling (%) |
|
-2.15 |
-1.08 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
1.61 |
||
ICE Class |
I |
|||||||
Epithelium Condition |
3A |
|
N |
N |
N |
N |
SC |
|
6A |
|
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
||
8A |
|
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
||
ICE Classes Combined: |
1 x I, 2 x II |
|||||||
Classification: |
No Category |
N= Normal
SC= Sunken Cornea
N= Normal
TA = Test item adherance
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, the test item is not classified according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro eye irritation study was performed according to the OECD Guideline 438 and in compliance with GLP to evaluate the possible corrosivity or severe irritancy potential of the test item as measured by its ability to induce toxicity in an enucleated chicken eye.
0.03 mL of the test item was applied onto the cornea of each of three enucleated eyes. A further three enucleated eyes were treated with positive control item. A further two enucleated eyes were treated with negative control item
The ocular reactions observed in eyes treated with the test item were:
- maximal mean score of corneal opacity: 0.8, corresponding to the ICE class II;
- mean score of fluorescein retention: 0.8, corresponding to the ICE class II;
- maximal mean corneal swelling: 1.61 % at 120 min after treatment corresponding to the ICE class I.
The combination of the three endpoints for the negative control, physiological saline solution, was 2 x I, 1 x II. Therefore, the negative control is classified as "No Category", as expected. The combination of the three endpoints for the positive control, was 3 x IV. Therefore, the positive control is classified as "Corrosive/Severe irritant", as expected.
Under the test conditions, the test item is not classified according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)