Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-918-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 14 - 22 June 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 04 February 2015
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 25 June 2018
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Rathausgasse 4, 91126 Schwabach, Germany
- Type of study:
- activation of keratinocytes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reaction product of C16-18 (even numbered) alcohols with reaction products of 1,3,5-Triazine, 2,4,6,-triamine, polymer with formaldehyde, methylated
- EC Number:
- 947-918-6
- Molecular formula:
- not applicable, UVCB substance.
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction product of C16-18 (even numbered) alcohols with reaction products of 1,3,5-Triazine, 2,4,6,-triamine, polymer with formaldehyde, methylated
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
In vitro test system
- Details on the study design:
- TEST SYSTEM:
- KeratinoSens™: immortalised adherent cell line derived from HaCaT human keratinocytes transfected with a stable insertion of the Luciferase construct
TEST SAMPLE PREPARATION:
The test item was dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF) (purity ≥ 99%). A stock solution of 200 mM was prepared by pre-weighing the test material into a glass vial. A stable suspension was formed when diluted 1:100 in cell culture medium. Vortex mixing was used to aid solubilisation.
Based on the stock solution a set of 12 master solutions in 100% solvent was prepared. The stock solution of the test item was diluted 11x using a constant dilution factor of 1:2. Then the 100x concentrated master solutions were further diluted 1:25 in cell culture medium resulting in a 4% share of the solvent. Since the test item was dissolved in THF, DMSO was added at a final concentration of 4% (v/v). These 4x concentrated test item solutions were finally diluted 1:4 when incubated with the cells. Based on this procedure the final concentration of the solvent was 1% (v/v) in all test item concentrations and controls.
CONTROLS:
- Blank: A blank well with no seeded cells was included in every plate to determine the background.
- Negative Control: DMSO at a final concentration of 1% (v/v) in test item exposure medium
- Solvent Control: THF at a final concentration of 1% (v/v) in test item exposure medium
- Positive Control: Cinnamic aldehyde (CA, (2E)-3-phenylprop-2-enal; CAS 104-55-2; > 98%). CA was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 6.4 mM and was further diluted four times with a constant dilution factor of 1:2 resulting in a concentration range of 0.4 mM – 6.4 mM. The final concentration of the solvent DMSO was 1% (v/v) for all wells.
CELL LINE:
Cells from frozen stock cultures, tested routinely for mycoplasma, were seeded in culture medium at an appropriate density and were used for routine testing. Only cells at a low passage number < 25 (P 2 in experiment 1; P 10 in experiment 2) were used. Cells were cultured in 75 cm2 culture flasks in maintenance medium at 37 ± 1°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.
MEDIA:
- Maintenance Medium: Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (GlutaMAX™) with 1.0 g/L D-glucose and 1 mM Na-Pyruvate, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine calf serum (FBCS) and 1% geneticin.
- Assay Mediuim: Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (GlutaMAX™) with 1.0 g/L D-glucose and 1 mM Na-Pyruvate, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine calf serum (FBCS)
- Test Item Exposure Medium: Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (GlutaMAX™) with 1.0 g/L D-glucose and 1 mM Na-Pyruvate, supplemented with 1% fetal bovine calf serum (FBCS)
DOSE GROUPS:
- Negative Control: 1% (v/v) DMSO in test item exposure medium and 1% (v/v) THF
- Positive Control: CA: 4 μM, 8 μM, 16 μM; 32 μM; 64 μM
- Test Item: 2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.63, 7.81, 3.91, 1.95, 0.98 μM
Each concentration step of the test item and the positive control was assessed in three replicates in every independent run. The negative control was assessed using six replicates per 96-well plate in every independent run.
EXPERIMENTAL PRODECURE:
For the test item two independent experiments using separately prepared test item solutions and independently harvested cells were conducted. Each independent run consisted of three replicates for every concentration step of the test item and the positive control.
A cell suspension of 8 × 10E4 cells/mL in assay medium was prepared. 125 μL of the cell suspension corresponding to 1 × 10E4 cells were dispensed in each well, except for the blank. To determine the luciferase activity cells were seeded in white 96-well plates (flat bottom). In parallel, cells were seeded in a transparent 96-well plate (flat bottom) for the determination of the cell viability.
After seeding cells were grown for 24 h ± 1 h in assay medium at 37 °C ± 1 °C and 5% CO2. Thereafter, the assay medium was discarded and replaced by 150 μL test item exposure medium. 50 μL of the shortly before prepared 4x master concentrations were transferred to the luciferase and cell viability plates, resulting in an additional 1:4 dilution of the test item.
All plates were sealed using a sealing tape to avoid evaporation of volatile compounds and cross-contamination between wells by the test items. Treated plates were incubated for 48 h ± 1 h at 37 °C ± 1 °C and 5% CO2.
Luciferase activity:
After 48 h ± 1 h of exposure, the supernatant was aspirated from the white assay plates and discarded. Cells were washed once with Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS). Subsequently 20 μL of passive lysis buffer were added into each well and the plate was incubated for 20 min at room temperature in the absence of light.
Plates with the cell lysate were placed in the plate reader for luminescence measurement. 50 μL of the luciferase substrate per well were injected by the injector of the plate reader. The plate reader waited for 1 s before assessing the luciferase activity for 2 s. This procedure was repeated for each individual well.
Cell viability:
For the cell viability plate the medium was replaced with 200 μL test item exposure medium. 27 μL MTT solution were added directly to each individual well. The plate was covered with a sealing tape and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C ± 1 °C and 5% CO2. Afterwards the medium was removed and replaced by 200 μL 10% Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) solution per well. The plate was covered with sealing tape and incubated in the incubator at 37 °C ± 1 °C and 5% CO2 overnight (experiment 1) and over the weekend (experiment 2). After the incubation period the plate was shaken for 10 min and the Optical Density (OD) was measured at λ = 600 nm.
Results and discussion
In vitro / in chemico
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: Experiment 1
- Parameter:
- other: Fold Induction of luciferase activity
- Value:
- 0.83
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: Experiment 2
- Parameter:
- other: Fold Induction of luciferase activity
- Value:
- 0.91
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Outcome of the prediction model:
- negative [in vitro/in chemico]
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
Refer to section "Any other information on results incl. tables" below.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results of the Cytotoxicity Measurement
|
Concentration [µM] |
Cell viability [%] |
|||
Experiment 1 |
Experiment 2 |
Mean |
SD |
||
Solvent control |
- |
100 |
100 |
100 |
0.0 |
Positive control |
4.00 |
102.3 |
105.8 |
104.0 |
2.4 |
8.00 |
108.3 |
99.1 |
103.7 |
6.5 |
|
16.00 |
114.1 |
112.3 |
113.2 |
1.3 |
|
32.00 |
116.8 |
118.6 |
117.7 |
1.3 |
|
64.00 |
112.1 |
122.5 |
117.3 |
7.3 |
|
Test item |
0.98 |
103.4 |
108.5 |
105.9 |
3.5 |
1.95 |
105.8 |
103.7 |
104.7 |
1.5 |
|
3.91 |
104.9 |
97.8 |
101.3 |
5.0 |
|
7.81 |
96.5 |
92.8 |
94.7 |
2.6 |
|
15.63 |
101.1 |
96.4 |
98.8 |
3.3 |
|
31.25 |
107.6 |
99.9 |
103.7 |
5.4 |
|
62.50 |
105.8 |
102.5 |
104.1 |
2.3 |
|
125.00 |
114.3 |
113.5 |
113.9 |
0.6 |
|
250.00 |
122.0 |
119.1 |
120.6 |
2.1 |
|
500.00 |
131.3 |
117.4 |
124.3 |
9.8 |
|
1000.00 |
119.2 |
116.6 |
117.9 |
1.8 |
|
2000.00 |
110.2 |
110.5 |
110.3 |
0.2 |
Table 2: Induction of Luciferase Activity Experiment 1
Experiment 1 |
Concentration [µM] |
Fold induction |
Significance |
||||
Rep. 1 |
Rep. 2 |
Rep. 3 |
Mean |
SD |
|||
Solvent control |
- |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
Positive control |
4.00 |
0.95 |
0.99 |
1.22 |
1.05 |
0.15 |
|
8.00 |
1.13 |
1.30 |
1.30 |
1.24 |
0.10 |
|
|
16.00 |
1.43 |
1.68 |
1.79 |
1.64 |
0.18 |
YES |
|
32.00 |
2.25 |
2.59 |
2.85 |
2.56 |
0.30 |
YES |
|
64.00 |
5.65 |
7.51. |
7.99 |
7.05 |
1.24 |
YES |
|
Test item |
0.98 |
1.36 |
1.34 |
1.51 |
1.41 |
0.09 |
|
1.95 |
1.10 |
0.81 |
0.87 |
0.93 |
0.16 |
|
|
3.91 |
0.98 |
0.96 |
0.84 |
0.93 |
0.08 |
|
|
7.81 |
1.07 |
1.06 |
0.98 |
1.04 |
0.05 |
|
|
15.63 |
0.86 |
0.81 |
0.82 |
0.83 |
0.03 |
|
|
31.25 |
1.04 |
0.94 |
0.95 |
0.98 |
0.05 |
|
|
62.50 |
0.98 |
0.94 |
0.95 |
0.96 |
0.02 |
|
|
125.00 |
1.17 |
0.85 |
1.02 |
1.01 |
0.16 |
|
|
250.00 |
1.36 |
1.07 |
1.10 |
1.18 |
0.16 |
|
|
500.00 |
1.27 |
1.05 |
1.36 |
1.22 |
0.16 |
|
|
1000.00 |
1.32 |
1.06 |
1.15 |
1.18 |
0.13 |
|
|
2000.00 |
1.48 |
1.25 |
1.15 |
1.30 |
0.17 |
|
Table 3: Induction of Luciferase Activity Experiment 2
Experiment 1 |
Concentration [µM] |
Fold induction |
Significance |
||||
Rep. 1 |
Rep. 2 |
Rep. 3 |
Mean |
SD |
|||
Solvent control |
- |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
Positive control |
4.00 |
1.21 |
1.28 |
1.49 |
1.32 |
0.15 |
|
8.00 |
1.11 |
1.37 |
1.29 |
1.26 |
0.13 |
|
|
16.00 |
1.15 |
1.44 |
1.35 |
1.32 |
0.15 |
|
|
32.00 |
1.83 |
1.70 |
2.13 |
1.88 |
0.22 |
YES |
|
64.00 |
3.77 |
3.63 |
3.97 |
3.79 |
0.17 |
YES |
|
Test item |
0.98 |
1.080 |
1.17 |
0.99 |
1.08 |
0.09 |
|
1.95 |
0.84 |
1.02 |
0.88 |
0.91 |
0.09 |
|
|
3.91 |
0.89 |
0.92 |
1.00 |
0.94 |
0.05 |
|
|
7.81 |
0.96 |
1.09 |
0.92 |
0.99 |
0.09 |
|
|
15.63 |
0.87 |
0.97 |
0.95 |
0.93 |
0.06 |
|
|
31.25 |
0.90 |
0.99 |
1.01 |
0.97 |
0.06 |
|
|
62.50 |
0.92 |
0.99 |
0.97 |
0.96 |
0.03 |
|
|
125.00 |
1.03 |
1.15 |
1.22 |
1.13 |
0.09 |
|
|
250.00 |
1.02 |
1.26 |
1.28 |
1.19 |
0.14 |
|
|
500.00 |
1.08 |
1.55 |
1.21 |
1.28 |
0.24 |
|
|
1000.00 |
1.08 |
1.10 |
1.11 |
1.10 |
0.01 |
|
|
2000.00 |
0.85 |
1.13 |
1.12 |
1.04 |
0.16 |
|
Table 4: Acceptance Criteria
Criterion |
Range |
Experiment 1 |
pass/fail |
Experiment 2 |
pass/fail |
CV Solvent Control PC (1% DMSO) |
< 20% |
14.6 |
pass |
9.3 |
pass |
CV Solvent Control TI (1% THF) |
< 20% |
20.0 |
pass |
9.6 |
pass |
No. of positive control concentration steps with significant luciferase activity induction > 1.5 |
≥ 1 |
3.0 |
pass |
2.0 |
pass |
EC1.5 positive control |
7 < x < 34 µM |
13.22 |
pass |
21.19 |
pass |
Induction positive control at 64 μM |
2.00 < x < 8.00 |
7.05 |
pass |
3.79 |
pass |
Table 5: Historical Data
Criterion |
Range |
Mean |
SD |
N |
CV Solvent Control |
< 20% |
11.6 |
3.5 |
96 |
No. of positive control concentration steps with significant luciferase activity induction > 1.5 |
≥ 1 |
2.4 |
0.6 |
96 |
EC1.5 positive control |
7 < x < 34 µM |
18.5 |
6.0 |
96 |
Induction positive control at 64 μM |
2.00 < x < 8.00 |
3.8 |
1.5 |
96 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: negative for keratinocyte activation
- Conclusions:
- After 48 h of exposure to the test substance luciferase activity in KeratinoSens™ cells was not induced in at least two consecutive concentrations with statistical significance affording at least 70% viability in at least two independent experiments. In the first and second experiment, no significant luciferase induction > 1.5 was found in the tested concentration range. Therefore, no EC1.5 value could be calculated. From this it has to be concluded that the test substance has no keratinocyte activating potential.
- Executive summary:
negative for keratinocyte activation
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.