Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Pentatriacontan-18-one
EC Number:
207-993-1
EC Name:
Pentatriacontan-18-one
Cas Number:
504-53-0
Molecular formula:
C35H70O
IUPAC Name:
pentatriacontan-18-one
Test material form:
solid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
human
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
The EpiOcularTM tissue consists of normal, human-derived keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a stratified squamous epithelium similar to that found in the human cornea. It consists of highly organized basal cells. These cells are not transformed or transfected with genes to induce an extended life span. The EpiOcularTM tissues are cultured in specially prepared cell culture inserts with a porous membrane through which nutrients can pass to the cells. The tissue surface is 0.6 cm2.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
Replicate Amount
Tissue 1 50.0 mg
Tissue 2 50.3 mg

Duration of treatment / exposure:
6 hours
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
18 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
% Viability Mean
Value:
101.3
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

Designation

Positive Control

Stearone

% Viability (Tissue 1)

39.3%

101.7%

% Viability (Tissue 2)

37.9%

100.9%

% Viability Mean

38.6%

101.3%

Criterion

Demanded

Found

Mean OD of negative control

>0.8 and < 2.5

1.6

% mean relative viability of positive control

< 50% of negative control

38.6%

Variation within replicates

< 20%

1.2% (negative control)

1.4% (positive control)

0.8% (test item)

 

Values for negative control and for positive control were within the range of historical data of the test facility .

 

Therefore, the experiment is considered valid.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the test, Stearone is considered non-eye irritant in the EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test.
After treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was 101.3%.
This value is well above the threshold for eye irritation potential (≤ 60%).
All validity criteria were met. The criterion for optical density of the negative control was fulfilled: The OD value was 1.6 (> 0.8 and < 2.5).
The positive control induced a decrease in tissue viability as compared to the negative control to 38.6%. Variation within the replicates of the controls and the test item was acceptable (< 20%).
For these reasons, the result of the test is considered valid
Executive summary:

One valid experiment was performed.

The test item Stearone was applied to a three-dimensional human cornea tissue model in duplicate for an exposure time of 6 hours.

 

After treatment, the respective substance was rinsed from the tissue; then, cell viability of the tissues was evaluated by addition of MTT, which can be reduced to formazan. The formazan production was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) of the resulting solution.

Demineralised water was used as negative control and methyl acetate was used as positive control.

The controls showed the following results: After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD>0.8 and < 2.5, OD was 1.6. The positive control showed clear eye irritating effects, the mean value of the relative tissue viability was 38.6% (< 50%). 

Variation within tissue replicates of the controls and the test item was acceptable (< 20%).

 

After treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was 101.3%. This value is well above the threshold for eye irritation potential (≤ 60%). Test items that induce values above the threshold are considered non-eye irritant.

 

Under the conditions of the test, Stearone is considered non- eye irritant in the EpiOcularTMEye Irritation Test.