Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From April 19 to May 03, 1994
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
1987
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
1992
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OTS 798.4500 (Acute Eye Irritation)
Version / remarks:
1993
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Chromate(2-), [2,4-dihydro-4-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-5-methyl-2-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-onato(2-)][4-[(4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)azo]-3-hydroxy-1-naphthalenesulfonato(3-)]-, disodium
EC Number:
281-013-0
EC Name:
Chromate(2-), [2,4-dihydro-4-[(2-hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-5-methyl-2-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-onato(2-)][4-[(4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)azo]-3-hydroxy-1-naphthalenesulfonato(3-)]-, disodium
Cas Number:
83833-37-8
Molecular formula:
C36H24CrN9Na2O9S
IUPAC Name:
hydroxylamine
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Dr. Karl Thomae GmbH, Postfach 1755, D-88397 Biberach a.d. Riss
- Age at study initiation: 14 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: male - 3.0 kg, females - 2.7 to 3.1 kg
- Identification: by unique cage number and corresponding ear tags.
- Housing: individually in stainless steel cages (size: 120 x 52 x 60 cm) equipped with
feed hoppers, drinking water bottles and wood for gnawing.
- Diet: Pelleted standard Kliba 341, Batch nos. 82/94 (at delivery of the animals to the
euthanasis of the animals) rabbit maintenance diet ("Kliba", Klingentalmuehle AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst), ad libitum
- Water: community tap water from Füllinsdorf, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: four days under laboratory conditions after health examination.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24 °C
- Humidity (%): between 40-76 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours artificial fluorescent light (approx. 100 Lux)/12 hours dark

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 g of test item
Observation period (in vivo):
14 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 (1 male and 2 females)
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: eyes not rinsed

SCORING SYSTEM: The scores of each animal at the following reading times (24, 48 and 72 hours) were used in calculating the respective mean values for each type of lesion (Commission Directive 93/21/EEC, April 27, 1993).

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal: 25, 26, 27
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: no signs of irritation
Remarks on result:
other: Eyes not rinsed
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal: 25, 26, 27
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: no signs of irritation
Remarks on result:
other: Eyes not rinsed
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
Redness
Basis:
animal: 25, 26, 27
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: Eyes not rinsed
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
Chemosis
Basis:
animal: 25, 26, 27
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: no signs of irritation
Remarks on result:
other: Eyes not rinsed

Any other information on results incl. tables

VIABILITY / MORTALITY AND CLINICAL SIGNS

No clinical signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the test and observation period, and no mortality occurred.

COLORATION

In the area of application no staining of the cornea and conjunctivae by the test article was observed.

IRRITATION

The test item showed a primary irritation score of: 1.0, when applied to the conjunctival sac of the rabbit eye.

CORROSION

No corrosion of the cornea was observed at any of the reading times.

BODY WEIGHTS

The body weight of the animals was within the normal range of variability.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP criteria not met
Conclusions:
Non irritant
Executive summary:

Method

The primary irritation potential of the test substance was investigated according to the OECD guideline 405.

0.1 g of the test item was istilled into one eye of each of three young adult New Zealand rabbits. The treated eyes were not rinsed after substance application. Scoring of irritation effects were performed 1, 24, 48, 72 hours 7 and 14 days after test article application. The scores of each animal at the following reading times (24, 48 and 72 hours) were used in calculating the respective mean values for -each type of lesion. The primary irritation score was calculated by totalling the individual cumulative scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours and then dividing the resulting total by the number of figures.

Observations

No staining of the cornea and conjunctivae of the treated eyes by the test article was observed. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals.

Conclusion

Non irritant.