Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Carcinogenicity

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
carcinogenicity
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Carcinogenicity on rat (male, female and composite) was estimated by using two predictors: Leadscope
Model Applier and ACD/Percepta.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)tricyclo[9.4.0.0^{3,8}]pentadeca-1(11),3,5,7,9,12,14-heptaen-2-ol
EC Number:
609-737-8
Cas Number:
3967-32-6
Molecular formula:
C21H23NO
IUPAC Name:
2-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)tricyclo[9.4.0.0^{3,8}]pentadeca-1(11),3,5,7,9,12,14-heptaen-2-ol

Test animals

Species:
rat
Sex:
male/female

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Model  Leadscope  ACD/Percepta  Consensus prediction
 Rat male  NEGATIVELittle reliable  NEGATIVELittle reliable
 Rat female  NEGATIVELittle reliable  -  NEGATIVELittle reliable
 Rat composite  NEGATIVELittle reliable  -  NEGATIVELittle reliable

Leadscope Model Applier

Model  Leadscope  LeadscopePositivePrediction probability  Model FeaturesCount  30% Sim. Training Neighbors Count
 Rat male  NEGATIVELittle reliable 0.49  6  3
 Rat female  NEGATIVELittle reliable  0.19  11  3
 Rat composite  NEGATIVELittle reliable  0.21  8  3

Model Features Count. Parameter used to verify that the target compound, i.e. 5-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-ol, contains a significant number of features that are present in the prediction model. The structural features used to make the prediction provide information on the reliability of the prediction: a prediction provided by a low number of features means that the model is not able to fully describe the test compound, while a prediction supported by a high number of features reveals that the test compound is well described by the model. Since 6, 11 and 8 features were found for carcinogenicity on rat male, female and composite, respectively, it was concluded that 5-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-ol is well represented by the models.

30% Similarity Training Neighbours Count. Number of compounds structurally similar to the target, i.e. 5-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-ol, in the model's training set of compounds. Another way to assess the reliability of the prediction is looking at the analogues, i.e. the compounds structurally similar to the target in the model's training set of compounds. While this information does not take part to the prediction, it provides the user a complementary means to see how similar compounds were predicted and what the experimental values of similar compounds are. Look at analogues is also an initial, less-sophisticated easy way to understand estimate of toxicity.

Three compounds were identified in the training set off the three models as analogues to the test substance characterized by little similarity with respect to the target 5-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-ol. Therefore, the prediction was considered of little reliability.

ACD/Percepta did not provide any prediction for the target 5-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-ol since it resulted to be out of the applicability domain of the models.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Carcinogenicity on rat male, female and composite of the target was estimated by using two predictors:
Leadscope Model Applier and ACD/Percepta. The two predictors were employed in order to apply a
consensus approach to enhance the reliability of the prediction. In the consensus assessment only reliable
predictions are to be taken into account.
In the cases of the carcinogenicity on rat male and female, the target 5-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-ol resulted to be out of the applicability domain of ACD/Percepta.
Leadscope predictor concluded that the target 5-(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)-5Hdibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-ol is NEGATIVE for carcinogenicity on rat male and female, although the predictions are of little reliability.