Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Classification in one of the hazard categories of the hazard class "Specific target organ toxicity — repeated exposure" according to (EU) No. 1272/2008 is not required.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12/2008 to 04/2009
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study according to OECD guideline under GLP conditions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Winkelmann GmbH, Gartenstraße 27, 33178 Borchen, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 5 to 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 160 - 180 g
- Housing: open makrolon cages type 2000P (TechniPlast)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Maintenance diet rat/mouse, pellets, No. 1324 (Altromin GmbH & Co. KG, 32791 Lage), ad lib.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Autoclaved community tap water, ad lib.
- Acclimation period: 8 days (male), 9 days (female)

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°C +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Freshly prepared before application
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
28 days
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
63 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal in water
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
250 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal in water
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal in water
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: In a previously performed dose range finding study with dose escalation, the test item was administered in doses up to 2000 mg/kg body mass over a time period of 19 days and produced no observable toxic effects in the test animals. In accordance with the sponsor,
1000 mg/kg was determined as high dose for the present test.

- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random):
rats were weighed individually and grouped into weight categories, the main group consisting of animals weighing between 100 g and 120 g. These were placed consecutively into prepared cages. Rats weighing more than 120 g, but not more than 140 g, and rats weighing less than 100 g, but more than 80 g, were caged alternately after the main weight group was placed.
Positive control:
No
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once weekly

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once weekly

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once weekly
- Dose groups that were examined: all

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: On day 29
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: all

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: On day 29
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: all

URINALYSIS: No

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once weekly
- Dose groups that were examined: all
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / unusual behaviour
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see table)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see table)
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Details on results:
Detailed clinical signs, food and water consumption, motoric activity, and reactivity to sensory stimuli showed no remarkable abnormalities.
The mean body mass increase of all experimental groups was within normal range for rats of
this strain and age.
Analysis of haematology and serum biochemistry showed normal results in the vast majority
of parameters monitored. The only alteration in comparison to their control group occurred in the male high dose group where the level of glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) was
significantly lowered. GOT acts as an indicator for liver dysfunctions and could indicate
beginning liver stress.

The histomorphological examination of the selected rat organs did not reveal morphological
lesions considered to be related to the test item. No morphological differences were noted
between the groups. All microscopic findings noted in various organs of animals of the high dose group did not distinguish significantly treated rats from control animals or the
differences noted were regarded as random events. All these findings are considered to be spontaneous in nature and within the normal background pathology commonly seen in rats of
this strain and age.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
behaviour (functional findings)
body weight and weight gain
clinical biochemistry
clinical signs
food consumption and compound intake
food efficiency
gross pathology
haematology
histopathology: neoplastic
histopathology: non-neoplastic
mortality
ophthalmological examination
organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
water consumption and compound intake
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Executive summary:

A daily oral administration of the test item Disodium phosphonate to Wistar rats at a dose level of 63, 250 and 1000 mg/kg body mass over a time period of 28 days resulted in very few and only mild systemic and local effects in test animals treated with the high dose (1000 mg /kg) but did not produce any pathological evidence of a local or systemic toxicity of the test item.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
satisfying

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity via oral route - systemic effects endpoint:
Study according to OECD guideline under GLP conditions

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification in one of the hazard categories of the hazard class "Specific target organ toxicity — repeated exposure" according to (EU) No. 1272/2008 is not required. This can be stated since the NOAEL value of 614 mg/kg bw/day obtained from a 90 days study with a similar substance (Monosodium phosphonate) is significantly higher than the upper guidance value in table 3.9.3 of (EU) No. 1272/2008 which is at 100 mg/kg bw/day.

Similarly, the NOAEL value of 1.000 mg/kg bw/day, obtained from a 28 days study is significantly higher than the upper guidance value in table 3.9.3 of (EU) No. 1272/2008, modified with a correction factor of 3 for the shorter exposure time (reference value = 300 mg/kg bw/day).

Beside these values, no observations on adverse effects have been made which would induce a need for classification.