Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The study is practically non-toxic in rats after single ingestion and dermal application. An inhalation study performed with poorly characterized dust did not show acute inhalation toxicity.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1976
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: non GLP, prior to OECD guidelines. Design and reporting details adequate.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Higher doses tested; only 7 day observation period.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
according to BASF-internal standard
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Mean body weight: males 241 g, females 176 g
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
Details on oral exposure:
Suspension in 0.5% aqueous CMC solution
Test concentration used: 35%
Doses:
4640 and 10000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 7 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 10 000 mg/kg bw
Mortality:
None
Clinical signs:
other: Partly feces dark-blue coloured
Gross pathology:
Nothing abnormal detected
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
10 000 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Klimisch 2

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1976
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
significant methodological deficiencies
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Animals are exposed to dust generated by blowing air through a layer of the test material
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
fixed concentration procedure
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Mean body weight: 191 g
Route of administration:
inhalation: dust
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
air
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Remarks:
gravimetrically
Duration of exposure:
8 h
Concentrations:
5.95 mg/l
No. of animals per sex per dose:
12
Control animals:
other: air control
Details on study design:
Particle size distribution not determined. The concentration of the test material in the air was calculated from the volume of blown air and the difference in the weight of the test material layer before and after the study.
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC0
Effect level:
>= 5 mg/L air
Based on:
test mat.
Exp. duration:
8 h
Remarks on result:
other: Particle size distribution unknown
Mortality:
None
Clinical signs:
other: Slight mucosal irritation
Gross pathology:
Nothing abnormal detected
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Value:
> 5 mg/m³ air
Physical form:
inhalation: aerosol

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1976
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: non GLP, prior to OECD guidelines, design and reporting details adequate
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
higher dose; body weight not reported.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
according to D.N. Noakes and D.M. Sanderson: A Method for Determining the Dermal Toxicity of Pesticides; Brit. J. Ind. Med. 26, 59 (1969)
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Mean body weight: males 148 g, females 131 g
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Details on dermal exposure:
A 50% test substance concentration was used.
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
2500 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Application area: 50 cm2
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 500 mg/kg bw
Mortality:
None
Clinical signs:
other: During and after application as well as after the 14-day observation period, the animals were brisk. Local findings after 24 hours: all animals blue test substance residues, reddening not visible. Local findings after 8 days: light-blue substance residues
Gross pathology:
Nothing abnormal detected
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
2 500 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Klimisch 2

Additional information

The experimental data on acute toxicity were generated prior to the introduction of GLP and OECD testing guidelines. Study reports containing adequate description of the experimental procedure and results and with adequate identification of the test substance are available.

The protocol for acute oral toxicity differs from the OECD testing guideline by the shorter observation period (7 instead of 14 days) and by a five-fold higher dose (10000 instead of 2000 mg/kg bw) (BASF 1976). Considering the lack of toxicity observed under these testing conditions, the study is considered to provide sufficient information despite the shorter oberservation period. Blue discoloration of the feces indicated passage of the blue colorant through the gastrointestinal tract.

The protocol for acute dermal toxicity differs from OECD testing guideline 402 by a higher dose of 2500 mg/kg bw. No systemic toxicity was observed during the 14 -day observation period. As the test item coloured the application site, local effects could not be completely during the first part of the study. Then later no local effects were noted.

An acute inhalation study with poorly characterized dusty material in rats was performed (BASF 1976). The test atmosphere was generated by blowing air through a layer of the test material and the concentration was calculated from the weight difference of the layer of the test material. During the 8h exposure, an average concentration of ca. 5mg/L was applied. No particle size characterization and no online concentrations are available, therefore the study is only indicative. No rat died as a consequence of treatment.

For additional information, an acute inhalation study with phthalocyanine (OECD 403, GLP, BASF 2021) was taken into account. Particle characterization confirmed that the material was a nanomaterial. At the limit dose of 2 mg/L of dust, one of ten rats died during the 4h exposure period. No indication of systemic toxicity was observed at necropsy at the end of the observation period.

In addition, a study with intraperitoneal application of 2000 mg/kg bw is available (BASF 1976). No animal died during the 8 -day observation period.


Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008

The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result, the substance is not considered to be classified for acute toxicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the thirteenth time in Regulation (EC) No. 2018/1480.