Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-679-6 | CAS number: 124-09-4
Boiling point
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
BP = 201 °C at 10E5 Pa (p = 99.99 %)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
One reliable study provides boiling point measurements of pure and anhydrous hexamethylene diamine, using Differential Scanning Calorimetry. The method can be related to OECD103 guidelines, but some aspects of method are unclear (justifying Klimisch score of 2, and not 1). The study was not conducted under GLP, but nevertheless with obvious scientific considerations for quality.
This result is supported by numerous literature data which could not be assigned in most cases, and pressure is not indicated, however all consistent results were within the range 196-205 °C, therefore probably carried out at ambient pressure, and/or conditions of reduced pressure.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
