Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 225-266-7 | CAS number: 4747-21-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
The skin sensitizing potential of N-Methylisopropylamine-HCl (MIPA-HCl) was assessed in the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) according to the OECD TG 429 (2002). For this purpose groups of 5 female CBA mice each were treated with 3%, 10% and undiluted test item in vehicle (Pluronic®). The negative control group received 1% vehicle only. Three days after the last of 3 consecutive applications of test preparation onto the ear of the animal, the mice were injected intravenously with 20 μCi of 3H-thymidine in 250 μl of sterile saline into a tail vein. After 5 hours the animals were sacrificed (cervical dislocation). Ear weight was determined and the left and right auricular lymph nodes were collected and the weight of the pooled lymph nodes from both sides was determined for each animal.Mean stimulation indices (SI; test group versus control ratio) for lymph node weight, cell count, ear weight and 3H-thymidine incorporation were assessed (BASFSE58H0413/082114, 2008).
Referring to the respective indices, the mean lymph node weight SI was 0.94, 1.23 and 1.39 at 10%, 30% and undiluted test item, respectively, versus 1.00 for control. The mean cell count SI was 0.89, 1.15 and 1.49 at 10%, 30% and undiluted test item, respectively, versus 1.00 for control. The mean ear weight SI was 1.00, 1.04 and 1.14 at 10%, 30% and undiluted test item, respectively, versus 1.00 for control. the mean 3H-thymidine incorporation SI was 0.63, 1.92 and 3.05 at 10%, 30% and undiluted test item, respectively, versus 1.00 for control.
Thus, the undiluted test item (with Pluronic®) caused some increase in cellularity and 3H-thymidine incorporation into the lymph node cells at the border of biological relevance (cut off stimulation index of 1.5 respectively 3). There was a minimal increase in lymph node weights as well. Additionally slight increase in ear weight as indication of ear skin irritation was observed at this concentration. No relevant increases in cell counts, 3H-thymidine incorporation, lymph node weight and ear weight were observed at the concentrations of 10 and 30% test item. Since the SI for cell count and 3H-thymidine incorporation was at the border of biological relevance the lymph node response was not attributed to a skin sensitization reaction. The minimal increase in ear weight of the mice treated with the undiluted test item (with Pluronic®) was seen as an indication of ear skin irritation, which is considered to have effected the borderline lymph node response. Based on the results described above, it is concluded that MIPA-HCl is not a sensitizer in the LLNA under the test conditions chosen.
Migrated from Short description of key information:
No study on the sensitizing potential of N-Methylisopropylamine (MIPA) is available. Nevertheless, since MIPA has be shown to be corrosive, no testing for sensitization is needed according to column 2 of REACH Annex VII.
Moreover, a skin sensitization is available for N-Methylisopropylamine-HCl (MIPA-HCl), which was considered for read-across. In this study, MIPA-HCl was examined in the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) according to the OECD TG 429 (BASFSE58H0413/082114, 2008). MIPA-HCl was not a sensitizer in the LLNA under the test conditions chosen.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Additional information:
Whereas no data on skin sensitization are available for N-Methylisopropylamine (MIPA), which was shown to be corrosive, the skin sensitizing potential of N-Methylisopropylamine-HCl (MIPA-HCl) was assessed in the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) according to the OECD TG 429 (2002). For this purpose groups of 5 female CBA mice each were treated with 3%, 10% and undiluted test item in vehicle (Pluronic®). The negative control group received 1% vehicle only. Three days after the last of 3 consecutive applications of test preparation onto the ear of the animal, the mice were injected intravenously with 20 μCi of 3H-thymidine in 250 μl of sterile saline into a tail vein. After 5 hours the animals were sacrificed (cervical dislocation). Ear weight was determined and the left and right auricular lymph nodes were collected and the weight of the pooled lymph nodes from both sides was determined for each animal.Mean stimulation indices (SI; test group versus control ratio) for lymph node weight, cell count, ear weight and 3H-thymidine incorporation were assessed (BASFSE58H0413/082114, 2008).
Referring to the respective indices, the mean lymph node weight SI was 0.94, 1.23 and 1.39 at 10%, 30% and undiluted test item, respectively, versus 1.00 for control. The mean cell count SI was 0.89, 1.15 and 1.49 at 10%, 30% and undiluted test item, respectively, versus 1.00 for control. The mean ear weight SI was 1.00, 1.04 and 1.14 at 10%, 30% and undiluted test item, respectively, versus 1.00 for control. the mean 3H-thymidine incorporation SI was 0.63, 1.92 and 3.05 at 10%, 30% and undiluted test item, respectively, versus 1.00 for control.
Thus, the undiluted test item (with Pluronic®) caused some increase in cellularity and 3H-thymidine incorporation into the lymph node cells at the border of biological relevance (cut off stimulation index of 1.5 respectively 3). There was a minimal increase in lymph node weights as well. Additionally slight increase in ear weight as indication of ear skin irritation was observed at this concentration. No relevant increases in cell counts, 3H-thymidine incorporation, lymph node weight and ear weight were observed at the concentrations of 10 and 30% test item. Since the SI for cell count and 3H-thymidine incorporation was at the border of biological relevance the lymph node response was not attributed to a skin sensitization reaction. The minimal increase in ear weight of the mice treated with the undiluted test item (with Pluronic®) was seen as an indication of ear skin irritation, which is considered to have effected the borderline lymph node response. Based on the results described above, it is concluded that MIPA-HCl is not a sensitizer in the LLNA under the test conditions chosen.
Migrated from Short description of key information:
No data available, nevertheless, since MIPA is corrosive, no testing is needed according to column 2 of REACH Annex VII.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Whereas no data on skin sensitization are available for N-Methylisopropylamine (MIPA), which is corrosive, the skin sensitizing potential of N-Methylisopropylamine-HCl (MIPA-HCl) was assessed in the LLNA as non sensitizing. Thus no classification is needed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.