Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 284-895-5 | CAS number: 84989-06-0 The fraction of tar acids, rich in 2,4- and 2,5-dimethylphenol, recovered by distillation of low-temperature coal tar crude tar acids.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- fish early-life stage toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Benoit et al. 1982. A fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, early life stage toxicity test method evaluation and exposure to four organic chemicals. Environ. Pollute 28: 189-297.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: U.S. EPA. 1982. Wildlife aquatic organism data requirements. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Federal Register 47: 53212.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling: weakly
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Test organisms (species):
- Pimephales promelas
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: fathead minnow embryos and larvae - Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 30 d
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- control, solvent control, 0.75, 1.5, 3.2, 7.4, and 15.0 (mean measured)
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): Mount and Brungs (1967) type proportional diluters
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable): hatching of embryos, survival and growth of larvae - Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 30 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Endpoint:
- fish early-life stage toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 210 (Fish, Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Early life stage test
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- not specified
- Test organisms (species):
- Pimephales promelas
- Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 32 d
- Hardness:
- soft water from lake Superior
- Test temperature:
- 25 ± 0.2 °C
- Dissolved oxygen:
- ≥ 6.1 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- - Fluorescent lights provided 16h light per day
- Water chemistry data was recorded at the Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, MN
- Fish were fed newly hatched brine shrimp ad libitum twice per day so that moderate accumulation occured. - Duration:
- 32 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.35 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- not specified
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- larval development
- Duration:
- 32 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2.57 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- not specified
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- larval development
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
The chronic toxicity of p-cresol to fish was tested with Pimephales promelas in an Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test equivalent to OECD Guideline 210. The 32d NOEC is 1.35 mg/L.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: The effects on the embryos and larvae
Measured Concentration (mg/L)* |
Hatch (%)* |
30 days post hatch |
||
Survival (%)* |
Length (mm)* |
Weight (mg)* |
||
15(1) |
56(31)** |
0(0)** |
- |
- |
7.4(0.9) |
66(20)** |
12(5)** |
14(1)** |
20(2)** |
3.2(0.3) |
84(6) |
69(1) |
19(2)** |
53(3)** |
1.5(0.3) |
68(12) |
62(2) |
21(3) |
78(8) |
0.75(0.2) |
98(1) |
58(25) |
22(2) |
90(22) |
Solvent Control |
96(2) |
86(2) |
21(2) |
80(6) |
Control |
94(6) |
93(10) |
21(2) |
70(1) |
* Mean (standard deviation)
** Significantly (p = 0.05) different from controls
Exposure to 7.4 and 15 mg/L 2,4-xylenol significantly reduced the hatching of fathead minnow embryos. No fathead minnow larvae survived exposure to 15 mg/L and survival of larvae was significantly reduced at 7.4 mg/L. Larvae survival was not affected at concentrations as high as 3.2 mg/L. Larvae growth was significantly reduced at concentrations of 3.2 and 7.4 mg/L , but was not affected at 0.75 and 1.5 mg/L.
NOEC for macromolecular content (nucleic acid, protein) was 2.57 mg/L (LOEC 4.20 mg/L). NOEC for growth was >4.2 mg/L
Description of key information
Based on all available information and following an analogue read-across and worst case approach the freshwater NOEC (32d) of 1.35 mg/L determined for Pimephales promelas (Barron & Adelman, 1984) for p-cresol represent the most sensitive effect value for chronic toxicity to fish for Tar acids, Xylenol fraction (CAS 84989-06-0) and is considered as key value for the chemical safety assessment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water fish
Fresh water fish
- Effect concentration:
- 1.35 mg/L
Additional information
Data on chronic toxicity to fish are available for two constituents of Tar acids, Xylenol fraction (CAS 84989-06-0) (p-cresol and 2,4 -xylenol). These data are used to determine the long-term hazard on fish by applying an analogue read-across approach. The studies were conducted with Pimephales promelas as test species. The resulting NOEC values of the two studies are in the same range with 1.35 mg/L for p-cresol (Barron & Adelman, 1984) and 1.5 mg/L for 2,4-xylenol (Le Blanc, 1984). The lower NOEC value of 1.35 mg/L for p-cresol was considered for PNEC derivation and risk assessment and for deriving environmental classification. For details on the read-across approach please refer to the analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13.
Chronic effect values determined in the available studies are listed in the table below:
Source |
* |
Species |
p-cresol |
m-cresol |
o-cresol |
Barron & Adelman, 1984 |
f |
Pimephales promelas |
NOEC (32d) = 1.35 mg/L |
- |
- |
|
2,3-xylenol |
2,4-xylenol |
2,5-xylenol |
||
Le Blanc, 1984 |
f |
Pimephales promelas |
- |
NOEC (30d) = 1.5 mg/L |
- |
* f = freshwater
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.