Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation and corrosion was tested in two individual in-vitro tests with negative findings. The substance is not irritant to skin and eyes. Respiratory irritation is not applicable, as exposure via inhalation is not expected  to this transported intermediate under normal operating conditions and acute inhalation toxicity data are not required under Regulation (EC) 1907/2006.
. Therefore, the additional labeling is not required.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Skin irritation

Anin vitroskin irritation study (EpiSkinTM) was performed with the substance (Heppenheimer, 2010), and results indicate that it is not irritant to skin.

Eye irritation

An acute eye irritation / corrosion test according to OECD 405 (Leuschner, 2010) was performed with the substance, and results indicate that it is not irritant to eyes.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Skin irritation:

The study by Heppenheimer (2010) is an in vitro skin irritation study, is considered the key study for skin irritation, and will be used for classification.

After treatment with the test item slags, steelmaking, vanadium, the relative absorbance values did not decrease (106.6 %). Therefore, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential. The substance was not tested irritant to skin, and does not need to be classified or labelled for skin irritation.  

Eye irritation:

The study by Leuschner (2010) is an in vivo eye irritation study (OECD 405), is considered the key study for eye irritation, and will be used for classification. The overall irritation results are as follows:

Opacity (cornea and iris), 1h after application: mean score=0.0

Conjunctival chemosis, 1h after application: mean score=0.33

Conjunctival chemosis, 24, 48 and 72h after application: mean score=0.0

Conjunctival redness, 1h after application: mean score=1.33

Conjunctival redness, 24, 48 and 72h after application: mean score=0.66

Conjunctival redness, 6d after application: mean score=0.0

Accordingly, the substance was not tested irritant to eyes, and does not need to be classified or labelled for eye irritation. 

Respiratory irritation:

Respiratory irritation is not applicable, as exposure via inhalation is not expected to this transported intermediate under normal operating conditions and acute inhalation toxicity data are not required under Regulation (EC) 1907/2006.