Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In a skin sensitisation Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) according to OECD TG 429 using phenol, mono- & distyrenated (LS 500) as test substance, a SI > 3 was observed for the 3% preparation. SI for the 30% preparation was 27. An EC3 of 1.67% was determined by linear interpolation of the 0.3% and 3% data points. Based on this data, LS 500 is considered to be a strong skin sensitiser.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Novares LS 500; phenol, styrenated
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: RÜTGERS Novares GmbH, batch No. 28324
- Composition of test material: composition is specified in IUCLID Sect. 13 - Assessment reports under Certificate of Analysis_Novares LS 500_phenol, styrenated
- Substance type: organic
- Purity test date: 30.11.2012
- Stability under test conditions: no measured data; based on chemical structure assumed to be stable
Species:
mouse
Strain:
Balb/c
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Breeding farm VELAZ s.r.o., Koleč u Kladna, Czech Republic
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 10 wks
- Weight at study initiation: 17 - 19 g
- Housing: macrolon cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +- 3
- Humidity (%): 30 – 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Vehicle:
other: DAE 433
Concentration:
mixture of 40% dimethylacetamide, 30% acetone and 30% ethanol
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: dispersion
- Irritation: no
- Lymph node proliferation response: not examined


MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
Stimulation index (SI) is ≥ 3
Response increases in dose-related manner
Criteria for irritation potential: individual and mean ear weight


TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Days 1-3: 25 µL test suspension in DAE 433 , 1x on day 1, 2, and 3
Days 4 and 5: no treatment
Day 6: Injection of 250 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 7.5 x105 Bq (c. 21 µCi) of 3H-methyl thymidine
into all test and control mice via the tail vein. Five hours later, the animals were killed.



Positive control substance(s):
other: DNCB (dinitrochlorbenzene, 0.5% (w/v) solution)
Statistics:
Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, and then the non-parametric two-group Mann-Whitney rank test (probability level 0.05) was applied to all two-group comparisons [using software Statgraphic ® Centurion (version XV, USA)].
Parameter:
EC3
Value:
1.67
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.56
Test group / Remarks:
0.3% test substance in vehicle
Parameter:
SI
Value:
3.43
Test group / Remarks:
3% test substance in vehicle
Parameter:
SI
Value:
27.07
Test group / Remarks:
30% test substance in vehicle
Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
CELLULAR PROLIFERATION DATA
Proliferation data were determined as mean (radioactivity counts - DPM) of five test animals per group

DETAILS ON STIMULATION INDEX CALCULATION
SI was calculated using the following equation: SI = mean of test groups (DPM) / mean of control group (DPM)

EC3 CALCULATION
Linear interpolation with EC3 = c + [(3–d)/(b–d)]×(a–c), where the data points lying immediately above and below the SI value of 3 on the LLNA dose–response plot having the coordinates (a,b) and (c,d), respectively.
(a = dose concentration immediately above SI=3, b = SI immediately above 3)
(c = dose concentration immediately below SI=3, d = SI immediately below 3)

Table 1: Individual and mean radioactivity in cell suspensions (Report Table 4)

Animal No.

Activity (DPM)

NC

(1-5)

PC

(6-10)

30%

(11-15)

3%

(16-20)

0.3%

(21-25)

1

550.98

11374.69

13868.92

1764.06

1504.40

2

485.39

10401.94

15745.06

1472.17

1129.52

3

568.93

10347.82

13338.82

1552.57

1218.14

4

526.30

8837.38

15573.65

1811.12

1337.00

5

596.74

9493.34

15327.01

2756.16

1804.05

 Group

mean

545.67

10091.03

14770.69

1873.02

1398.62

SI

1.00

18.49

27.07

3.43

2.56

NC = vehicle control; PC = positive control

Table 2: Individual and average ear weights (Report Table 5)

Animal No.

Weight of ear biopsies (milligrams)

NC

(1-6)

PC

(7-12)

30%

(13-18)

3%

(19-24)

0.3%

(25-30)

1

24.5

27.4

30.6

21.4

22.0

2

25.2

27.5

26.7

21.3

21.2

3

23.8

26.5

35.2

22.4

18.8

 4

23.4

26.7

30.6

22.9

20.2

5

24.7

27.2

30.2

21.8

22.3

 Group mean

24.32

27.06*

30.66*

21.96*

20.90*

SD

0.72

0.44

3.02

0.68

1.43

NC = vehicle control; PC = positive control

* statistically significant with p =< 0.05, Mann-Whitney test

Table 3:  Summary table (Report Table 6)

Group

Radioisotope incorporation

in lymph nodes

Ear weight

Mean DPM

SI

Mean (mg)

NC

545.67

1.0

24.32

PC

10091.03

18.49+

27.06

30%

14770.69

27.07+

30.66

3%

1873.02

3.43+

21.96

0.3%

1398.62

2.56

20.90

Bold figures with + = values >= 3

Interpretation of results:
Category 1A (indication of significant skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In a LLNA according to OECD TG 429, an EC3 of 1.67 was determined. This requires phenol, styrenated (LS 500) to be classified as skin sensitising Cat. 1A.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

One valid study is available to assess the skin sensitising potential of phenol, mono- & distyrenated (LS 500). This study is used as key study. Supporting evidence results from a study with the supporting substance phenol, methylstyrenated (LA 300).


 


Phenol, mono- & distyrenated (LS 500)


In a mouse local lymph node assay according to OECD TG 429 performed under GLP conditions using 0.3, 3, and 30% preparations of the test substance in vehicle (mixture of 40% dimethylacetamide, 30% acetone, and 30% ethanol), an increase of the Stimulation Index (SI) for the test groups over controls was observed (SI = 2.56, 3.43, and 27.07). For the concentrations 3% and 30% the SI was > 3 demonstrating a sensitising response of the test animals following the treatment with test substance. The mean ear weight was below (3% test group = 21.96 mg) and above (30% test group = 30.66 mg) the ear weight of the controls (24.32 mg). The SI > 3 for the 3% test group indicates sensitising potential of phenol, styrenated (Brabnikova/VUOS 2010). An EC3 of 1.67% can be calculated by linear interpolation between the data points 0.3% and 3% indicating a strong skin sensitising potential of phenol, mono- & distyrenated (LS 500).


 


Supporting evidence - Phenol, methylstyrenated (LA 300)


In a similar mouse LLNA with the supporting substance phenol, methylstyrenated, SI for the test groups were 2.26 (0.3%), 2.68 (3%), and 16.35 (30%), indicating a lower sensitising potential compared to phenol, mono- & distyrenated. Ear weight was lower for the 0.3% and 3% group (22.46 and 22.52 mg) and higher for the 30% group (33.18 mg) compared to controls (24.32 mg) (LA 300_Brabnikova/VUOS 2010). EC3 was determined to be 3.63%.


Based on the positive results of the mouse LLNA (Brabnikova/VUOS 2010), phenol, mono- & distyrenated is rated as a potential contact allergen.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

In a LLNA according to OECD TG 429 conducted under GLP conditions, an EC3 of 1.67% was determined. Based on criteria of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (GLP regulation), phenol, mono- & distyrenated (LS 500) is classified as skin sensitising Cat. 1A (EC3 2).